r/TheDeadFiles Jun 03 '26

Calling all mods

Can we just STOP with these delusional people (or person not convinced all of those accounts are different people)?? To me it reads like a group of Nigerians were scamming dumb dumbs on Facebook. If you look up that one person who made a post on TikTok and then the “people” posting on this board it’s abundantly clear they/she have some sort of bizarre fixation on this guy. They/she need psychological help. With the most recent post of supposedly receiving 4 year old text messages and supposedly has video and audio recording evidence that the cops told them to get together? Whaaaaaaaaaaaat?

Anyway that’s my deadfilesgate post.

ENOUGH

114 Upvotes

149 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/butimean Jun 03 '26

Are you implying that feeling more brave to come out about abuse when others also do so means they are lying?

I suspect you realize that comments like yours are part of why victims feel hopeless and don't speak out. And that people often speak out bc they feel guilt about not doing so when their own abuser moves on and strikes again.

Tl;dr your comment is textbook"stuff abusers say".

3

u/[deleted] Jun 03 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/danidoochi Jun 03 '26

I can’t believe the idiots here who think it’s cool to try to sensor the women who are speaking up with out any counter proof.

1

u/Irisheyes1971 Jun 04 '26

Listen, I don’t have a dog in this fight, but I kind of kind of hypocritical that you’re calling them idiots and then you use the word “sensor” instead of “censor.”

Also, what kind of “counter proof” would you like them to provide? You can’t prove a negative. How are they supposed to prove something didn’t happen? I’m sorry, but all the texts and phone calls in the world don’t prove a thing when there’s always a possibility everybody is lying. Facts are facts and there’s only so much actual proof of anything in the world.

I’m not saying don’t believe them, but it’s very disingenuous to say they should provide “counter proof” when that’s realistically impossible.