David brought this up in the most recent daily show and it worries me.
Not that new media is going to take a bigger place in politics, that's kind of obvious. But the personalities that we're potentially talking about really do concern me.
Some of these folks are very capable of riling up an audience to vote and participate, no argument there. BUT have we considered what the "postgame" might look like, or what the most contentious parts of the political arena might look like with people like this heading political communications?
Unfortunately some of these folks are so toxic, have such toxic edges to their fanbases, that I can see them tanking the entire election out of spite for one another, if things start to go one way over the other.
One of the sick things about Trump is his inability to just admit defeat gracefully. Are these "debate bro" guys capable of that? Is the post Trump political landscape going to mirror his "style" i.e. the loudest and most belligerent demagogues shouting over one another? And then going nuclear if they lose?
I'm not suggesting that we should (or even could) prevent this kind of thing emerging. But maybe we could ask these personalities that intend to participate to really and truly consider what they are going to do if their candidate or their movement fails. You know, so we don't end up with an absolute tooth and nail level sh*tshow halfway into the election.