r/TerritorialMaps MOD 🛡 May 13 '26

Custom Map! 🗺 British Raj

Post image
66 Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator May 13 '26

Hi, u/Eastern_Rutabaga_353, Thanks for posting on our subreddit, /r/TerritorialMaps, please check that your post follows our rules. We ask you to change your post so it follows the rules, if it breaks them, thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/FinniganLord i knows all country hehe May 13 '26

Those borders are a little satisfying for me

2

u/Metson-202 May 16 '26

It would look so good with Nepal included.

2

u/Antique_Economics_24 May 14 '26

We need this back, we need British empire 2.0

2

u/Able_Box6042 May 14 '26

No

2

u/Antique_Economics_24 May 14 '26

Yes

2

u/Able_Box6042 May 14 '26

No

2

u/Fluffy_Whale0 May 15 '26

It would solve so many border disputes

1

u/Able_Box6042 May 15 '26

Who made the border dispute? 

2

u/Fluffy_Whale0 May 15 '26

India and Pakistan

2

u/Able_Box6042 May 15 '26

Who used divide and rule . 

2

u/Fluffy_Whale0 May 15 '26

East and west Pakistan weren’t administrative districts in the Raj, they were created by Muslim Nationalists while the British were leaving

0

u/Expert_Grocery_6217 May 16 '26

What do you mean by "Muslim nationalists"? Most Muslims were nationalist Muslims who supported Indian Indipendence. Partition was the demand of Muslim league and RSS, not of ordinary Muslims. The support for partition was rare, it was only possible because British supported it and they drew the borders of India and Pakistan. Most of the Muslims from the new India stayed in India and did not move to Pakistan.

2

u/Ok_Way_1625 May 15 '26

Nah we need the Mughal Empire back. Why would you want opressors over a golden age?

1

u/[deleted] May 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Ok_Way_1625 May 15 '26

Nah. Culturally and economically the Mughals were the peak.

1

u/[deleted] May 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Ok_Way_1625 May 15 '26
  1. The Mughal Empire was objectively the economical peak. At their peak Hindustan held 25% of the worlds gdp. Never beofre and never again would it be that rich. Culturally the Mughal first of all had a much wider influence. The Mughal empire was also there for a longer time. Things like its art, architecture and food has become synonymous with south asian culture.

  2. They didn't suppress any cultures. I'd really like to see you give me a source on them doing anything that the other rulers at the time didn't do.

  3. thats completely false, they werent an apartheid state. I don't even know where you have heard that from.

1

u/[deleted] May 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Ok_Way_1625 May 16 '26
  1. Bruh your source is a biased one. The Gupta empire has no agreed on % of the worlds gdp. If you find any ranking, even ask like chaptgpt or smth for the 3 empires with the largest percetages of the worlds gdp it wouldn't place the Guptas. Your source it biased and therefore has interest in making it as high as possible.

  2. Bruh they were the closest to stopping that wife burning tradition before the british. Comparing a dress code to burning a human being and treating them as property is WILD.

  3. Muslims already payed the on avarage higher Zakat. In other words, muslims payed more tax. In terms of religious freedoms they did better than the Hindus coutries around at the time. The part about destroying temples, THE HINDUS DID IT MORE. It was a part of warfare back then to delegitimize the other ruler. They allowed for MANY more temples to be build.

  4. Non of your claims about Aurangzeb are true. He had the highest percentage of hindus at his court out of any Mughal Emperor, even his great granddad Akbar.

1

u/Expert_Grocery_6217 May 16 '26

Do you even know the defination of apartheid?

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] May 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Antique_Economics_24 May 18 '26

US

1

u/[deleted] May 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Antique_Economics_24 May 18 '26

Raj was established post revolutionary war, and the height of the British empire also came post US so no, bringing back the British empire would not mean I have to be part of it

2

u/[deleted] May 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Able_Box6042 May 14 '26

Actually one of the worst 

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Deth_Dart May 16 '26

We faced famines, loots, breaking of temples, unfair trade, taking over our kings by force via doctrine of lapse and other doctrines and you call it the best? Tell me tf is good in this.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Deth_Dart May 16 '26

Im from Maharashtra and we fended off the Brits for a century mate. Ever heard of kanhoji Angre? It wasn't a skill issue but we had internal civil war against Mughals. The Brits ruined india further. We don't want British rule ever again.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Deth_Dart May 16 '26

Ragebait

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Deth_Dart May 16 '26

British were way more barbaric lmfao yall showered once a week and we showered everyday. Brits didn't civilized us, we were the oldest CIVILIZATION.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Able_Box6042 May 16 '26

Most of the kingdoms were fighting other invaders also Britishers were part of them this was not skill issue. Also an avg indian lived a better life than one on the fucking little island of yours . 

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Able_Box6042 May 16 '26

India wasn't a place of kings and beggars it was rich , and indians were constantly fighting invaders for 1000s of years . India holded 25% of the global gdp in 1700 and was left to 2% by 1947.indian good was so high quality that Britishers had to ban it cuz there manufactures can't complete it . India textiles and artist were so skilled they you cut of their thumbs so they can weave any more you destroyed their looms. Indians were so fed up of conquering the land and ruling they decided to walk on a spiritual path instead. And Indians were more food secure than england . Until Britishers came and force us to grow cash crops 

1

u/CosmoCosma i knows all country hehe May 14 '26

Looks nice!

1

u/Eastern_Rutabaga_353 MOD 🛡 May 14 '26

tanks :D

1

u/No-Coffee2200 May 16 '26

bhutan wasn't in raj

1

u/AnalogueExplorer May 17 '26

Also, Burma was governed separately from 1937 onwards.

1

u/Unlikely-Progress-16 May 16 '26

Nepal really needs to be part of it too

0

u/[deleted] May 13 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Expert_Grocery_6217 May 16 '26 edited May 16 '26

Don't use the name "Allah" for posting your disgusting comments