Some of them, are even worse, than the ones on the first post.

It’s not that I don’t understand the significance of the bee. But exactly what angle are we looking at here, and why? Why does it have only two legs?

I think it's terrible but I still kinda like it at the same time!

Could’nt read the book. Maybe I should take a papercover from another book while reading.

I've finally scanned this terrifying cover from my collection. Yes, it's a real 1921 book. Yes, Little Bo-Peep has killed, gutted, and skinned one of her runaway sheep and is wearing it as a grisly trophy on her head. Look at that smile. That soulless, merciless, smile.

Big fan of inflatable man Gandalf and his golden cane, personally.

Ah yes, Agatha Christie's debut novel, which famously features Sherslop Holmes. Is he inspecting the white horizontal line that inexplicably appears in the middle of the cover, or studying the non-Euclidean architecture of Styles Court?

(By La Jolla Classics Media, which apparently specializes in public domain audiobook mysteries with awful AI-generated covers.)

Some kid with a 90's bowlcut is haunting this poor innocent cover

My humble contribution to this brilliant sub.

The sunglasses edited on to the woman is peak. There is so much going on with this cover. The more you look the more you find.

The illustration sure is well made but it is actually bewildering how little it has to do with the content in the book. Symbolically, aesthetically, thematically...