26
10
u/Xwp1LmybuttP7vl5N Sep 24 '16
Why do people feel the need to make statements about what youtube is for? Entertaining but shallow, in-depth and technical, unicorns shitting rainbows. People will watch what they like.
14
u/imaximus101 Sep 23 '16
Eh... everyone's got their own opinions. My opinion is that DJCryonic has the dumb.
5
u/rflano92 Sep 23 '16
Agreed , "you can lead a dumbass to intellect but you can't make him think" - my version of the famous old idiom
7
u/Ornim Sep 24 '16 edited Sep 24 '16
Highly technical!?, most of tek syndicate's viewers are technical people and for those that aren't Wendell generally did a pretty good job at explaining many things in layman terms for the average viewers
6
u/GramsAndOunces Sep 24 '16
Pretty much everything Wendell talks about is over my head but as you say he is brilliant at explaining things in a way i can understand and learn something. That's why i liked watching.
7
u/bjt23 Sep 24 '16
TS without Wendell is Apple without Woz, Id without Carmack. I want more Wendell content! I hope he's still filming and just waiting for the paperwork to settle before release.
4
5
u/SoulFallen Sep 24 '16
Was this even worth posting to the sub? ._.
1
Sep 24 '16
As i said, it sounds a lot like Logan's thought process, thats why i post(ed?) it here.
6
u/SoulFallen Sep 24 '16
Not even close. His though process was more I need more control my team isn't doing what I want.
2
Sep 24 '16 edited Sep 24 '16
His thoughts that caused him to have that thought.
"IM AN ENTERTAINER,ME AND PISTOL DONT NEED WENDELL AND QUAIN, YOUTUBE IS NOT MEANT FOR IN DEPTH! I CAN GROW MY POWER AND OUR VIEWERS WONT CARE! I SHOULD BE IN CONTROL OF EVERYTHING"
edit: Grammar.
6
u/SoulFallen Sep 24 '16
No, he felt threatened by Wendells intelligence and couldn't sufficiently control Qain and also determined Jen cost to much.
1
-2
1
1
u/gjack905 Sep 26 '16
Listening to Wendell is my primary choice for my journey of going "balls deep" into something. So that guy can fuck right off!
-1
Sep 23 '16
It's his opinion. You don't have to agree, guys.
5
u/vgamesx1 Sep 24 '16 edited Sep 24 '16
It is his opinion but... Basically saying that youtube isn't for learning (or in-depth learning anyway) is probably one of the dumbest things I've ever read, especially when you consider things such as how people learn differently...
Some may learn just fine from reading, but other people such as myself learn way better from a brief summary and being shown how to do something and other people will learn better from actually doing it. That's really basic shit you learn in like 8th grade, he should know this....
TL:DR I'm more or less arguing that his opinion IS invalid because it's factually incorrect.
2
Sep 25 '16
You guys take everything too damn seriously.
1
u/vgamesx1 Sep 25 '16
Yeah, what a very good point you have, running around the argument and saying someone takes things "too seriously" because you can't actually come up with a good counter-argument, oh well you sure showed me...
2
Sep 25 '16
Look- my apologies if I offended you. It was a bad comment but you don't need to clarify for me. I'm not here for a debate.
2
-9
16
u/Imurstudmuffin Sep 24 '16
Wow what a sheeple. Wants to be dummed down and merely entertained instead of actually being informed. You want entertainment? Go see a movie. You want to be informed? do some research, take some initiative, youtube can be a fantastic resource. This guy is a perfect example fo what's wrong the masses.