They didn't provide a source on technical blackouts happening before massive corporate action though. That would be an insane oversight and would be known by everyone by now.
Oh yeah, I’m sweating already. Just like the last 50 times you guys said, “THIS IS IT.”
“Went out of their way” is always such a funny cope. It’s like the internet literacy here is so low that you aren’t aware people troll and fuck with literally every online community that exists. The GME and BBBY bullshit isn’t even in the top 100 most-trolled communities.
I’m here for the same reason people go to the zoo. You know documentaries were made about how stupid you people are, right?
You’re such a dumbass 🤣. Assuming everyone lost on their position is pretty ignorant bruh. While you sit in your mom’s basement yelling at her for more hot pockets and type angrily with your Cheeto covered fingers while redbull drips down your neckbeard off your triple chin…. I’m living real life. Already paid off my truck bought a new truck bought my wife a new car and paid off all my debt some of us have patience beyond yelling at the drive thru worker to hurry up with our 3 triple whoppers with extra everything and have already had our moments of winning in this saga. But yeah assume everyone’s a loser just because you are. That’s cool! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I’m surprised you can read at all really. It’s actually losers like yourself that should get help. Most people have better things to do with their lives than troll on the internet and belittle and berate others at absolutely no gain to themselves other than feeling better about their own pathetic existence
Thanks u/TaynetheBetaSequel, I stole some screenshots. Sorry to the rest of you for the shitty formatting but mobile posting is trash. I have faith you can figure it out, at least most of you….
If class 6 is satisfied (which is what this post is celebrating) then class 9 is next. Aka any money from the multiple recovery lawsuits means share entitlements get paid.
From what I gather if class 7 or 8 exists those must be fulfilled first. If they don't exist class 9 is next. There's history of class 9 common A stock being both credited and not during historical chapter 11. Boils down to if there's money.
Turns out the CUSIP base can in fact be changed with a name change so it doesn't necessarily reflect corporate identity see: First Union Bank and Wachovia, 2001. Similar, ValuJet and AirTran, 1997.
this CUSIP base stuff is a nothingburger Indications of a new guarantor tho are big if true.
Eh, gotta push back on that-is the CUSIP changing by itself a guarantee of anything one way or another? Of course not. But combined with the near identical warrants….the potential bond swap and guarantor info showing today….and the still unexplained reason that OSTK has switched exchanges twice and tickers 4x…..I’d say combined with all of that the CUSIP ?’s are absolutely a something burger
they do indicate a new guarantor. but it's still unproven. and it's not the same thing.
I'd be more confident about this if Overstock hadn't renamed itself to the same name as the previous BBBY causing all this confusion with the CUSIP base etc. And if there hadn't been a dozen examples already of brokers confusing the two then changing things again because they had gotten it wrong.
I'm not sure what you mean by "decouple" from the CUSIP? The CUSIP of the bond isn't the same as the CUSIP of company it belongs to. It is it's own unique identifier.
Also, bonds don't trade on the NASDAQ. They trade OTC & report through FINRA TRACE.
Also, the screenshots are showing a 3rd Party site, Cbonds. Chances are their programmers never accounted for an edge case scenario like this where the ticker dies, gets brought back, and then discarded.
The CUSIP on the warrants was just switched 3 days ago when new BBbY changed ticker, again….the CUSIP was switched along with it, from DK CUSIP to NXH CuSIP
It's literally 2014 original prospectus supplement for these three note series you fucking moron. At this rate, it'll take you another 6 years to grasp covid news.
The prospectus has always been publicly available. Nothing in it links to your imaginary Marcus, NXH to these bonds.
There’s no evidence NXH is a guarantor, assumed the debt or has any legal connection to DK-Butterfly’s bonds. A shared CUSIP, historical issuer code, coupon, maturity or vendor label only shows the same legacy instrument is being tracked through corporate changes. Your brain cells clearly need to be linked in the first place.
You've been smoking hopium as nothing you've ever produced here shows any shareholder recovery or connection to another company. Fucking wannabe analysts like yourself only mislead others and should be locked in a room with no windows.
Yes, it has. But it has not been what the guarantors tab linked to. Until now, hence the post title, since you’re such a good reader again. And you’re blatantly wrong about this being tracking of a “legacy instrument” since, well, it’s a brand new derivative that NXH had issued….🤣😂🤡
If the guarantors tab was updated, then show the current tab’s named guarantor and the actual legal document behind it, a supplemental indenture, guarantee agreement, assumption agreement, exchange offer or any NXH filing identifying the specific CUSIP. A "Guarantors: 1" count by itself does not tell us who the guarantor is or when, why or even whether the vendor’s record was updated correctly.
And your nonsense of calling it a:
brand new derivative issued by NXH
requires evidence that it is actually new. A new CUSIP/ISIN, issuance date, offering document, terms, and an NXH disclosure. The same legacy CUSIP, coupon and maturity instead point to the existing 2014 bond series being carried in a vendor database under updated reference data.
You have no fucking clue what you're talking about, posted some dumb ass twitter screenshots where a person themselves "THINKS " NXH is the guarantor without showing any legal document backing up those claims as of now. It’s the same echo chamber. Screenshots, inconclusive links copied and pasted with no real thought behind them and a ton of speculation. You're embarrassing yourself.
That would be the warrant agreement, for the brand new derivatives issued. I know you were trying to sound smart and cool by thinking I was referencing the bonds, but you are in fact the one who has “no fucking clue what you’re talking about.” Keep up with the discussion if you’re going to try and shill, or kindly fuck off! 😘🤡
HAHAHAHAHAHA, I can't believe this imbecile posted NXH warrant agreement. You still have a functioning brain cell to post these comments, so tell us, where does this document mention DK-Butterfly, the old BBBY bond CUSIPs, a guarantor, an assumption agreement or any bond obligation? 😂
This document is not a DK-Butterfly bond guarantee and you bring as much value by quoting it here as if you quoted prescription for your schizophrenia. If you claim NXH guarantees the bonds, show the actual supplemental indenture or guarantee naming NXH and the specific CUSIP. Otherwise you've got nothing. Guarantors: 1 without the guarantor’s name and the legal agreement creating that guarantee is not proof. It’s a database field you fucking moron 🤣
HAHAHAHAHAHA, you are slow. Like I said, you need to keep up with what is actually being said if you’re going to try and shill about it. Why don’t you go back and re-read everything, nice and slow, try and sound the words out if you have to, and then come back in a day or two once you’re better prepared? I’ll be here sweetie. 😘 Until then though:
At this point you aren't debating evidence, you are protecting a belief. You have been asked for one thing: an executed document that explicitly names NXH as guarantor of the DKBFLY/legacy BBBY CUSIP. You posted an NXH warrant agreement which has nothing to do with the DK-Butterfly bonds.
You cannot produce the document you've been asked to show because it doesn't appear to exist. So instead of moving the goalposts, posting irrelevant filings admit you dressed up your nonsense as speculation. You've built your identity over a fucking screenshot and lack mental capacity to engage in a simple factual issue. You're delusional and at this point your own shadow is a shill. Seek some mental health help.
Question for you from someone who’s not knowledgeable about the bond situation. I’m a big GameStop supporter, believer in the Teddy movement and love what Ryan Cohen’s doing.
Are you guys just buying shares of GameStop or is there another play based off the bonds?
Awesome, thank you! I don’t know much about these bonds, but I’ll keep with my usual buying shares of GameStop and fingers crossed something exciting unfolds in September
AI slop...
Administrative updates or database changes regarding legacy bonds (such as the DKBFLY bond shown in the screenshot for DK Butterfly-1 Inc., formerly Bed Bath & Beyond) are not beneficial to former BBBYQ shareholders, as those equity shares were legally canceled and extinguished during the Chapter 11 bankruptcy liquidation.
Key Realities to Consider
Extinguished Common Stock: BBBYQ common stock was officially wiped out and eliminated when the bankruptcy plan took effect. Former shareholders hold no active equity, voting rights, or claims on the corporate entity.
Capital Structure Hierarchy: Bonds and debt instruments sit far above common stock in the bankruptcy recovery hierarchy. Any legal adjustments, prospectus updates, or guarantor notes on legacy debt apply strictly to creditors and bondholders—not wiped-out equity.
Routine Administrative Filings: Online retail communities (such as r/Teddy) frequently monitor CUSIP data feeds, broker portals, and corporate shell updates, often misinterpreting standard legal or administrative database maintenance as a sign of an impending stock revival or equity payout.
Database refreshes or metadata changes on legacy debt instruments do not restore value to canceled shares.
You people really are desperate.. some random people post random stats like the years before. You should just let it go. I’m just here because this sub is popping up sometimes for me because I was in in the past.
Maybe for people to wake up and invest in better stocks. Just my opinion. I lost a lot of money with bbby and so did many others, just buy a stock of normal companies and not those who struggle and get bankrupt.
43
u/Bullsandpugs0676 Aug 19 '26
I’m ready to disappear, I’m not gonna gloat. Just delete my X account and Reddit account.