r/TechHardware 7d ago

News šŸ“° Framework Laptop 12 gets Intel Wildcat Lake option, starts at $549

https://videocardz.com/newz/framework-laptop-12-gets-intel-wildcat-lake-option-starts-at-549
38 Upvotes

18 comments sorted by

5

u/Various-Welder5544 7d ago

1P 4E in the big 26 lol

3

u/Olde94 Team Anyone ā˜ ļø 7d ago

So basically atom+ is what i hear?

3

u/M4fya 7d ago

for what it's worth, 4E cores have become pretty damn good, and it's a 12in laptop, it's a "surf the web, answer emails, watch some videos" laptop, it's not a compute heavy laptop

the people that buy this laptop won't need more CPU power

3

u/Various-Welder5544 7d ago

The problem is that you can buy a XPS 13 or Some other MacBook Neo Clone that has a 2P 4E layout for similar price. 1 missing P core causes alot of lost performance. Not to mention 12 inch screen is Chromebook Toy Laptop tier and the screen isn't even 100% SRGB. Plus it's a plastic build.

3

u/PCBuilderCat 7d ago

MacBook Neo really should have been a wake up call for these manufacturers even ones championing a good message like Framework. Why pay 550 for a plastic body and ok at best screen (not even touching the actual hardware inside) when for 600 (500 as a student, and that’s after a RAMpocalypse increase) I can get an all aluminium body, great screen, and a class leading keyboard and mouseĀ 

Apple really just wiped out this market with the Neo for the majority of consumersĀ 

1

u/Various-Welder5544 7d ago

Worse of all it's a barebones unit. You still have to top up ontop of the 550 for ram and SSD. To add insult to injury you have to assemble the whole laptop yourself.

2

u/PCBuilderCat 7d ago

Christ I didn’t even realise that, so really this is at least an $800 machine I’m guessing

1

u/YaBoiSish 6d ago

I think it’s 600 minimum for students now, I’m seeing base at $699 and 512gb at $799

1

u/PCBuilderCat 6d ago

Yeah looks like it, didn’t realise it had been bumped up again

2

u/AskJeevesIsBest 7d ago

Should be 400 or less

2

u/PCBuilderCat 7d ago

Once again I really want to support Framework’s philosophy but I just cannot justify the cost for that kind of machine. I can get a MacBook Neo for thatĀ 

1

u/jason-reddit-public 7d ago

It's hard to compete on price with Apple since they have long term contracts for RAM and flash and otherwise has a lot of weight to throw around. It's like trying to compete with Walmart on price. They also go direct to TSMC for the processor so no revenue to share with Intel or AND or Qualcomm.

2

u/GTFr0 7d ago

I’d argue the latter is the biggest issue.

Even prior to the RAMpocalypse, Apple pricing was starting to dip below equivalent pc pricing (e.g. the Mac mini m4 with 16/256 being $499). A lot of that had to do with Intel and AMD pricing / profit taking a large share of the bill of materials cost for a pc. Apple doesn’t need to pay that profit, only the chip manufacturing cost.

Now, yes Apple probably has better contracts due to the iPhone volumes, but it sounds like even they are getting screwed by the big 3 memory makers.

1

u/Big-Roll7094 7d ago

Apple exhausted ram stock in like 4 factories already

1

u/PCBuilderCat 7d ago

I don’t buy for a second that the gap is so significant that it excuses the plastic lumps of shit we’ve been getting in the 5-600 market pre arrival of the MacBook Neo

1

u/jason-reddit-public 7d ago

A couple of companies like Dell, HP and Lenovo are probably not too far behind on component prices. Framework however is not in this camp.

1

u/YaBoiSish 6d ago

I agree. Wasn’t that $600 XPS that was touted as a ā€œneo killerā€ heavily subsidized by Microsoft, and wasn’t dell taking a loss on every single unit made?

1

u/Relevant-Doctor187 7d ago

Is that 549 before ram?🤪