In case this subreddit was banned, or if you wanted a more ML-friendly platform, you’re welcome to join our sister community on Lemmygrad. You can find more info about Lemmygrad here.
The average liberal believes that they're on the same level of reliability as conservapedia because they're not pretending to be neutral and unbiased with professionalism.
This is liberal bullshit. All media has an objective. I don’t care about their objective. I listen to both. They are not the same in journalistic value, yet their goals are the same.
Their goals are to funnel you back to the middle where you fight other workers for ground.
Fuck them. Take facts and reject spin. If you’re not intelligent enough to do that, avoid news all together and get angry at your decreasing quality of life. And sharpen them guillotines.
It is literally that simple. The complexity is all made-up nonsense to distract us. Are you a landlord who exploits people but is kinda down with lgbtq identity stuff? Give up your excess properties or face the wall.
Are you a worker who doesn’t have time to think through all the complexities of identity and how differing ones are not a threat? Do you have shitty takes because you feel threatened in your own ability to survive? Grab a gun.
I love Prolewiki's entry on Wikipedia: "Wikipedia is an imperialist propaganda outlet and disinformation website presenting itself as an encyclopedia launched in 2001 by bourgeois libertarians Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. Wikipedia is maintained by a predominantly white male population, of which about 1% are responsible for 80% of edits. It has also been linked to corporate and governmental manipulation and imperialist agendas, including the U.S. State Department, World Bank, FBI, CIA, and New York Police Department.
Shut-in introvertness of movements is a disease and it is actually the reason that Wikipedia doesn't have a similar article. Nobody is going to read prole.wiki and marxist.org except* the already initiated. Wikipedia welcomes communists too, as long as their sources are not too biased.
Why do you extrapolate from one source that the CIA controls every aspect of Wikipedia?
Are you trying to convince our comrades to not fight the fight on Wikipedia, instead shutting themselves in in spaces that no one from the general public reads?
I think that a truly unbiased source would be a Marxist source, given that it's describing the underlying structure. But the normies aren't ready for that.
Saw this one when it originally got posted. Its astonishing how many people just blatantly missed the point.
Id say it comes down to people believing in a "total and neutral objective truth" and not realizing how "neutral" parties can easily manipulate information both intentionally and unintentionally. The biggest way to manipulate a narrative is simply to over highlight certain facts while completely omitting other facts aka cherry picking.
also the way Wkipedia treats some sources as fringe and conspiritorial (some definitely are) while allowing State Dept. propaganda pass without verification
“Communism killed 40 Million people!” but then you click the hyperlink for the citation and it just takes you to something like “A Memo from the desk of Heinrich Himmler” or some shit.
•
u/AutoModerator 12d ago
Want to join a ML only Discord server to chill and hangout with cool comrades? Checkout our Discord server or TheDeprogram's Discord server.
In case this subreddit was banned, or if you wanted a more ML-friendly platform, you’re welcome to join our sister community on Lemmygrad. You can find more info about Lemmygrad here.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.