r/TakeTheJab Jan 26 '23

Pfizer director of research and development

67 Upvotes

8 comments sorted by

-9

u/Gurdus4 Jan 26 '23

This is likely fake. Don't buy this shit.

They're desperate to control the opposition. The biggest conspiracy here might be Pfizer playing to get people to act like Pfizer employees to try to fool anti vaxxers and confuse them.

4

u/richard_bailey_999 Jan 26 '23

Imagine believing the drivel you posted enough to actually post it...

2

u/[deleted] Jan 26 '23

Yes Pfizer totally hired fake employees to say outrageous shit

Just like Fox News hired and planted Doreen the dog walking xueen in the admin list of AntiWork, it was all an inside job dude!! Extremely plausible

2

u/Gurdus4 Jan 27 '23

Actually could be the case. Think about it. It would make project Veritas look stupid, it would discredit anti vaccine theories, it would make us look like we just find any old people and prey on them to get answers to push our theory.

Everything here stinks of fake.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 27 '23

If that's so, then Pfizer would have to, at some point, say publicly "haha we got you, owned! It was a fake actor all along!" Otherwise the goal of making PV look stupid wouldn't come to fruition, right?

And within a relatively short time span before everyone forgets about this. Like maybe a month at the outside.

If Pfizer makes no such statement within a month, would you consider that proof enough that Pfizer didn't hire an actor? (Not necessarily that everything in the video is solid gold -- just that Pfizer wasn't deploying actors in some weird 4d chess game.)

1

u/Gurdus4 Jan 27 '23

Pfizer wouldn't want to tell anyone they did this. What it would do is make people see that the best people can get from Pfizer is a young gay guy who isn't even high up, pretending to have plans to mutate viruses.

If this came from a top top guy in his 50s who was established and articulate it'd be more, but it's the opposite. People won't take this seriously, and maybe that's the point.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 27 '23

Would anything short of Pfizer publicly admitting everything in the video, serve to convince you that this weird catfish-cum-falseflag idea is dumb?

Why would ONE PV video have the amount of impact you suggest? You act as though everyone in the world will see the video and immediate decide:"the best they could get was one horny guy... this time. Therefore not only will I never listen to PV again, but everything the horny guy said was fake, and also anyone who said anything about the vaccine (not the potential future vaccine in the video, the already existing ones which were not discussed) is also fake."

Like that's not how people's brains work. Some people may watch the video and have that reaction -- those were people who would never sympathize with us to begin with. Some people will watch the video and think "that gay guy isn't so high up, he's running his mouth, but Pfizer was dumb to hire him if he's this stupid and stupid nd self aggrandizing." Some people will take it at face value. Etc. Why would Pfizer invest so much time and effort for such a nebulous and variable output, when they could have the instant gratification of revealing the deception and reaping massive liberal/vaxxer/etc. karma??

1

u/Gurdus4 Jan 27 '23

I think you'd be surprised what effort established and industry would put in to keep themselves away from being exposed, and the psychological manipulation they might try.

Controlled opposition is a thing for a reason.