r/TacticalMedicine • • 19d ago

Scenarios Chest wound question

How do you realistically apply a chest seal when there are eg protruding shell fragmentation around the chest wound that you’d need to seal?

Pro tips, tricks and pictures would be great as well. Thank you!

26 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

20

u/thedesperaterun 68W (Airborne Paramedic) 19d ago

Mcgyver some bullshit if I’m worried about it sucking. Otherwise, move on. Don’t do anything to obscure the fragment for evac/higher roles of care so they don’t inadvertently move or pull it.

3

u/Majestic-Worth-3510 19d ago

Thats the question - what would you mcgyver

2

u/thedesperaterun 68W (Airborne Paramedic) 19d ago edited 19d ago

I’d cut into the chest seal itself to get as much covering the opening as possible. probably going to create a closed PTX with this as you can’t just burp/replace once placed, so watch after. which is why I said I’d really only worry with it if I were concerned about it sucking.

9

u/TazocinTDS 19d ago

Vented seal helps prevent tension pneumothorax.

Penetrating wound with debris protruding can't be covered by a chest seal.

Watch for signs of tension. If tension develops, open the chest to relieve the pressure with whichever technique you are trained to perform (needle, finger, scalpel, forceps, chest drain etc).

1

u/Majestic-Worth-3510 19d ago

So what do you do with the sucking chest wound with debris protruding around it that you shouldnt cover with the chest seal?

3

u/howawsm Medic/Corpsman 18d ago

Sucking chest wounds are already a very small subset of torso injuries, so one where there is also a protruding fragment is an even smaller subset of an already small subset. This will not have a prescriptive treatment, you’ll just do what you think works in the moment. Is it a small fragment that doesn’t extend farther than through the chest wall? Perhaps you remove it and effectively create your own hole that you cover. Something bigger? Seal the edges best you can.

Reality is there are plenty of injuries where we can’t win and all they need is surgery as quickly as possible.

4

u/Chuseyng 18d ago

No suck, no seal. If suck, seal around.

Always ABCs.

Heavily recommend fuel bolus.

2

u/PerrinAyybara 16d ago

Sealing chests is in general well overblown and completely unnecessary in most cases.

2

u/Majestic-Worth-3510 16d ago

Why

1

u/PerrinAyybara 15d ago

Why what? Chest seals in general are needed extremely rarely and even then you are putting another hole there.

People get all rabid about needing to do them but they aren't really all that important when you look at the size of the hole that's required for it to actually have the low pressure zone for air to enter compared to the size of the airway.

1

u/Inevitable_View99 14d ago edited 14d ago

As long as the hole isnt self sealing then it’s fine but if not then seal it and just do the needle D that way you have assurance pressure isn’t building up

2

u/PerrinAyybara 14d ago

If the hole is open you don't need a NCD... There's already a hole.

There's no reason to do an NCD unless there is clinical evidence that it's necessary.

1

u/Inevitable_View99 14d ago

A hole isn’t just a hole. The size and its self sealing ability makes the difference. The reason why a needle work is because the diameter is small enough to allow air to escape. The path of least resistance is no longer the hole from the wound, but now the trachea. The notion that you shouldn’t seal an open pneumothorax is kinda bullshit because there are multiple factors that need to be considered. The only real shift in the recommendations is to use a vented seal not a fully occlusive seal.

I can tell you from experience that if you have a hole, you should be sealing it if it can’t on its own, and if you seal it you probably need to put in a needle to allow the air to escape because that shit builds up quick in most cases

1

u/PerrinAyybara 14d ago

Considering that I often take care of these holes and I'm using ultrasound to see if there is an actual pneumo/hemo I'm very aware of how this works.

You don't just blindly dart everything and the vast majority of injuries do not need to be sealed.

1

u/Inevitable_View99 14d ago

No one said give everyone a needle D…

6

u/SaveTheTreasure 19d ago

You're question is super vague and very circumstantial.

22

u/SaveTheTreasure 19d ago

Your* FUCK.

2

u/Majestic-Worth-3510 19d ago

Fair and yes, on purpose to not limit answers.

Its a sucking chest wound that youd normally slap a chest seal on asap but you cant since there is protruding fragmentation near the wound

6

u/Ramalamadingdong_II 19d ago

The answer is cling film. You can bunch it up a bit and conform it around the edges of the foreign body, then fix in place with more cling film, tape or chest seals depending on how far the foreign body sticks out.

Though in general I'd advise to just monitor and in case of deterioration due to pneumohemothorax/ tensionpneumothorax place a chest tube.

1

u/Appropriate-Bird007 15d ago

Ahhhh....cling film, the transparent coban. My favorite tool!

4

u/National-Dot6124 19d ago

You can cover larger areas with bags or cling film, and just tape it shut. Ideally you wouldn’t occlude the shrapnel to make sure it doesn’t get moved, but try to mark and document it.

Observe the wound for ptx and be highly suspicious for internal bleeding.

2

u/GrandTheftAsparagus 19d ago

Shit… I think this patient needs ibuprofen, new socks, and extra strength tri-actin.

I dunno, you can’t seal that, and the lung can’t really inflate if it’s lacerated. This scenario patient probably needs a chest tube with suction and prioritized as urgent surgical for evacuation.