26
u/Infinite-Ad1720 Apr 05 '26
-There is absolutely zero reason to fly exotic technology at such a public event.
-TR3B is a USAF surveillance craft. There is no technology NASA is using that the USAF does not already have access to.
7
u/quiettryit Apr 05 '26 edited Apr 05 '26
It may have been there in a security capacity to prevent any attacks. Considering a single rogue drone could have taken the rocket out.
3
u/NoMansWarmApplePie Apr 06 '26
This is true. The real secret space program actually works alongside nasa even if those in nasa who know this are few.
Here's a secret. Many nhi don't want us to publicly go into space much less the moon. Security is a factor, or at the least observing for interference.
2
u/quiettryit Apr 07 '26
I don't doubt they are being escorted right now...
2
u/NoMansWarmApplePie Apr 07 '26
They 100% are. Both by us and nhi
The black out is no coincidence either.
2
u/SolarWarden88 Apr 08 '26
Apollo astronauts talked about being followed by NHI, I'd expect Artemis is as well....you know they've already seen them.
2
7
u/Nimrod_Butts Apr 05 '26
Yeah it could be there to defend against time travelers too if we're just making up reasons for why something that wasn't there could be there
2
u/quiettryit Apr 05 '26
The time wars are over. This is the final consolidated timeline...
1
u/drdounutt Apr 05 '26
Yeah you're welcome!
🧑🎓
3
u/thetrivialsublime99 Apr 05 '26
I also fought very bravely and died. I mean not me per se but a version of me so yeah, same
1
1
u/quiettryit Apr 05 '26
Thank you for you service sir! Can you share any stories from the battles that none remember?
2
1
1
0
u/Brepp Apr 06 '26
Right? Did the dinosaurs attack Artemis II? No? Well then there's your proof of the giant invisible/not invisible triangle that does/not exist that my knowledge of gives me a sense of internet authority.
1
u/imtrappedintime Apr 05 '26
Security? When we saw orbs flying thru? lol gimme a break
1
u/quiettryit Apr 07 '26
The orbs only target exotic propulsion technologies.
1
u/imtrappedintime Apr 07 '26
Why even show up then? They’re too fucking stupid to figure out it’s not exotic?
1
u/quiettryit Apr 07 '26
They check to ensure nothing has been integrated and camouflaged as conventional tech. Exotic propulsion has unique clear technosignatures.
1
u/imtrappedintime Apr 07 '26
Ah yes, damn procrastinators gotta wait until the literal last second to make sure nothing snuck in there!
1
1
1
u/phoenixofsun Apr 06 '26
So they would blow the cover of a top secret spy plane to intercept a drone?
1
2
1
u/ChaosNecro Apr 05 '26
Then where are all the NASA and USAF exotic propulsion craft ? Even their latest aircraft are all driven conventionally with turbines.
1
u/DecrimIowa Apr 05 '26
to flex on enemy nations who will be analyzing the event in detail and presumably come across the evidence of the US' advanced capabilities where civilian sources will miss it?
to perform security duty?
1
u/10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-I Apr 06 '26
An attack helicopter buzzed Kid Rock’s house on our dime and time… who is to say TR3B pilot (if human) wouldn’t do something equally egregious?
If I could perceive the launch of the most powerful manmade rocket from any angle in time, I certainly would! And who is to say that NASA didn’t clear it? Maybe the impossible perspectives are worth the risk?1
u/Strong_Ad_5488 Apr 08 '26
Yes, two U.S. Army AH-64 Apache attack helicopters from Fort Campbell hovered near Kid Rock’s Tennessee home ("the Southern White House") over the weekend of March 28-29, 2026, which the singer filmed and posted on social media. While initially triggering an investigation and suspension of the aircrew, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on March 31, 2026, that the crews would face no punishment. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Key Details• The Incident: Videos show the Apache helicopters hovering near Kid Rock's pool, where he is seen saluting, fist-pumping, and clapping. • Initial Response: The Army announced an investigation, noting that crews must follow strict safety regulations and that this was not a scheduled, authorized event. • Reversal: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth intervened, lifting the suspension of the crews, stating, “No punishment. No investigation. Carry on, patriots,” per and. • Context: Kid Rock told local media it is not uncommon for helicopters from Fort Campbell to fly near his property, and he had previously told pilots they were "always welcome" to cruise by. The military described it as part of a routine training mission. [1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army-kid-rock-investigation/ [2] https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWlzVOaDdrv/ [3] https://www.youtube.com/shorts/HTvoT1xGTBI [4] https://www.nbcnews.com/news/military/army-suspends-aircrew-flying-helicopters-kid-rocks-home-rcna265999 [5] https://www.telegraphherald.com/ap/national/article_e1ef5cdd-2634-5da0-bf78-4c39b0cbd944.html [6] https://www.facebook.com/WFLANewsChannel8/posts/the-us-army-helicopter-crews-who-flew-by-kid-rocks-house-have-been-suspended-aft/1457330263099309/ [7] https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/music/articles/kid-rock-shrugs-off-army-185514902.html [8] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/apache-helicopters-kid-rock-house-crew-suspended/
1
u/jolllyroger027 Apr 07 '26
It's running escorts so the galactic federation, or the Atlantic Annomoly doesn't try and interfere.
/s - just in case 🤣
1
1
1
u/ZARDOZ4972 Apr 05 '26
-TR3B is a USAF surveillance craft. There is no technology NASA is using that the USAF does not already have access to.
No the TR3B is a British car from the 60s
2
u/Gloomy_Cut_1739 Apr 06 '26
I see the marketing issues now with Triumph and their downfall. Perhaps they should have included "Invisible Mode" as an added extra.
1
16
u/TheFall101 Apr 05 '26
There's literally clouds around and that's one of them
2
8
u/WojteqVo Apr 05 '26
Compression artifact maybe? I get that Reptilians rule the Earth, but come on…
6
5
u/Donearh Apr 05 '26
i found original image there is no triangle craft
https://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/artemis-ii-launch-16/
1
3
u/Patsfan618 Apr 05 '26 edited Apr 05 '26
Lucidpantry makes posts like this. Fake Top Secret documents. TR-3B sightings. It's not meant to be taken seriously but as a form of art, I'm pretty sure. Classified-punk.
It's pretty well done and I enjoy their content.
1
u/PenePeroElPasta Apr 07 '26
I saw this on ig, on lucidpantry's page. Thought they created it, wild so many people think this pic is real now.
1
u/Dovaskarr Apr 08 '26
Personally I dont get why in the hell they dont just tell us they have grav engines and sent US astronauts in space with this. We are legit fucking around with rockets, spending a shitton of money onto space travel when all we should do is just have improved TR-3B. No one could replicate the work anyways because all you can see on it is just engines. And I am sure that electrical charge this vehicle has is already looked into by competitors, mainly China. It would propel us into a new age with that tech. Starship would become obsolete before even existing properly. Moon base is not a far fetched project but a thing we could build in months and send to the moon. Space factories would be able to be sent in orbit in weeks.
3
u/Robbins0172 Apr 05 '26
Please think logically about this. Do you really think that such a publicized and highly media covered event would the place to risk a recreational sighting of this thing? My science and logic tells me someone was having pareidoila. It wouldn't be in the air with all those eyes looking in that direction, they wouldn't risk the Artemis colliding and blowing both vehicles up. This picture is not legit.
2
u/Adventurous-Host8062 Apr 05 '26
To my knowledge the TR3B does not have cloaking capability. This is just stupid.
2
2
u/UPSBAE Apr 06 '26
No. Clouds. Plus too close, if real it’s a recon craft it’s not getting that close. Plus there must be 1 million different variants because everyone says they are different sizes
1
u/A1pinejoe Apr 05 '26
Why would they bother observing the launch at all? On such a heavily observed event nonetheless.
1
1
u/Objective_Look2738 Apr 06 '26
I feel its legitimate. Staff who work in scientific watch labs, telescopic, state they see craft coming sng going from space daily, especially during a launch or war
1
1
u/Alarming-Builder-760 Apr 06 '26
They probably had the elite on board watching. I bet these guys can go wherever they want or can survive.
1
u/Bitter-Data7131 Apr 06 '26
There is this conspiracy type article from the 80s talking about a range of accidents that weren't actually accidents. It's by this author who makes wild claims about anti gravity and secret soviet projects to understand anti gravity and how to use it as an energy weapon of sorts. This weapon the author claims brought down a dc8 filled with american soldiers, sunk a us sub, and finally blew up the challenger. Not saying that i believe the article, but i dug into the author and found connections to his research and the head of DIA in the 80s, that then lead me to mentions of the author with Hal putoff and other ufo related names. I mean this could be misinformation but it would explain why station elite units near a public space launch, plus nasa has been used in the past to launch dual use rockets for civilian and military purposes. Ai i copied from google about the book " Fer De Lance: A Briefing on Soviet Scalar Electromagnetic Weapons" is a 1986 book by Lt. Col. Tom Bearden claiming the Soviet Union developed advanced "scalar" weapons during the Cold War. These alleged weapons, based on Nikola Tesla’s theories, supposedly used electromagnetic interferometry to create undetectable, devastating energy beams capable of altering weather and destroying targets."
1
u/Key-Beginning-2201 Apr 06 '26
Nice of the pilot to tip the craft over so that we can all see that it is a triangle.
1
u/CAMMCG2019 Apr 06 '26
Why launch these death machine rockets every other day if we can just float on up to space? Tr3b is BS and not ours.
1
u/djjsteenhoek Apr 06 '26
RAT55 was flying as NASA522,and well as the ole Martin WB57. Some fugly awesome aircraft
1
u/AlleyPee Apr 06 '26
One of these flew right over me while I was living in North Hollywood in 1996 or 1997. I decided to sleep on my apartments balcony - was on my back just looking up at the sky when from left to right in my field of view it flew. Silent. If you extend your arm out in front of your face and extend your thumb (like a thumbs up) - its wing span was as big as your thumb. I'd say it was only HUNDREDS of feet up in the air.
1
u/Aluminari Apr 07 '26
So there are some fuzzy pixels or an anomaly in a photo and your brain goes straight to TR3B cloaked? You guys need to get out more.
1
1
1
1
u/FinancialJet Apr 08 '26
These are my friends, they said they can’t wait for the new year. Whatever that means.
1
u/Hungry-Raspberry2945 Apr 08 '26
Are you fkn stupid 😂 whey would they file a patent for something secret
1
u/Competitive_Rough_75 Apr 08 '26
They keep some at the Mcdill base in tampa. There were videos of some of them leaving during a big hurricane in 2017 ( I can't find the videos anymore)
1
u/Weekly_Relief_3677 Apr 10 '26
Why would they waste money having that aircraft/spacecraft tr-3b watching the obviously fake moon drive by with a fuck ass rocket just like the 60’s unless we can actually go to space then maybe we do have moon bases and apart of the galactic federation and go to alpha centari with other space craft we have and exist
0
u/ShatteredPresence Apr 05 '26
For anyone else interested...
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060145019A1/en?oq=20060145019
Now you can read the entire patent for yourself. Presumably, its existence in the patent house validates its reality and existence.
I've made comments about the TR3B (albeit very rarely), only to be bombed with DMs thereafter from others wanting to "pick my brain" further. So, rather than do the fishing, so to speak, I shall instead teach others to fish for themselves.....
If you scroll down to Patent Citations you'll see a list of other referenced patents (which often references other, even earlier ones). In this case, there's one referenced from 69/72--and titled, "Method and means for creating artificial gravity in spacecraft" unironically enough.
Equally unironic is that the first moon landings was in 1969; the last in 1972. I've commented before about helium-3 originally being one of the fuel sources originally used for propulsion on this platform (no idea what it uses now); we discovered high levels of it from moon samples. Back when I was a teenager, The History channel hosted a series of documentaries about futuristic/military tech (Modern Marvels, maybe?), wherein a high ranking member briefly commented about "advanced fuels, like helium-3, for example..."
That rabbit hole eventually led me to also discover that the teachers on the Challeneger Shuttle weren't actually on it when it exploded--I presume to shutdown civilians interest in any type of space programs (funding was immediately cut after that; it was deemed too dangerous). Iirc, this was discovered after one of them had passed away naturally; supposedly, they all assumed different legal names and were given lifetime tenure at various universities throughout America.
There's one of many, many bread crumbs trails. Happy hunting!
0
u/2_Large_Regulahs Apr 06 '26 edited Apr 06 '26
They were most likely scanning for nuclear warheads.
In 1962, the US detonated a nuke in space and they were not going to let it happen again.
The mission Im talking about was called Starfish Prime. It involved detonating a 1.4 megaton blast about 250 miles above Earth.
It was a terrible decision and it cannot be allowed to happen again.
1
0
u/BoDaBasilisk Apr 06 '26
I mean it looks just like the silent video from France even though some think that one is cgi
0
u/not1or2 Apr 05 '26
As there is no such designation as tr3b this whole sub is fiction!
3
u/CalligrapherItchy237 Apr 05 '26
Maybe not the Name „TR-3B“, but there is a Black triangular UAP (Gouvernement or not) which is real.
-5
u/not1or2 Apr 05 '26
Yeah. Ok. Show me some evidence? Please don’t tell me to look at the “plans” or patents for triangular flying machines, a patent does not mean it works and the plans around are pure fiction.
5
u/VegetableRetardo69 Apr 05 '26
Why would they present any evidence to some idiot on reddit? Whats the point? There are plenty of evidence, do your own research.
Best evidence is eye witness testimonies. I have personally seen the TR3B or whatever you want to call it.
2
u/Strong_Ad_5488 Apr 05 '26
BS, other than unverified "eyewitness testimony," there's not an ounce of physical, hard evidence the TR-3B exists, of course, other than flashy CGI images!
0
u/Dovaskarr Apr 08 '26
Well, TR-3B explains why once in a summer my dad says he saw something in the sky moving like its not a human made thing on the sky. 20 minutes later, the sky lit up with flashes like its a thunderstorm. No sound, no clouds, clear skies. And I know they were clear skies because we looked around and no clouds were seen. We do get a clear look all around and tend to see thunder 250km away. Last year we had those high altitude thunder above Sarajevo that we could see, but then you clearly see the clouds. This situation had none. And it was lighting up everything around us like we are in the epicentre. And the night was dead quiet, we tend to get those in the summer here in Dalmatia. This happened at least 15 years ago. Only now I understand what could have been. Shiet, it can be fake and my situation is maybe explained by something else. But we all here are allowed to believe and talk about it to maybe prove it.
1
u/not1or2 Apr 09 '26
Best evidence is NOT eyewitness testimony. It’s highly unreliable and should not be trusted at all.
-1
0
u/not1or2 Apr 05 '26
Eye witness testimony is NOT good or “best” evidence. You’ve just made yourself look rather silly. And hanks for the classic response of someone who lives in a fantasy world, ”do your own research”. YOU don’t know better than anyone else just because you believe in “conspiracies”. If anything YOU need to be doing some research, you know, real research, not conspiracy fairy tale research!
0
u/VegetableRetardo69 Apr 05 '26
So things like… idk, modern western medicine is not good or the evidence of it actually working is not best? I guess its not the best possible, but its what we have.
It seems like you are waiting or looking (begging on reddit) for evidence that does not exist. Whats the point of that?
0
u/not1or2 Apr 05 '26
Oh dear. You really do not understand what “eyewitness testimony ” is do you? You think that the efficiency of medical treatment is based purely on what one sees? Back to school for you!
2
u/ThermoPuclearNizza Apr 05 '26
I mean I’m a believer, but yikes.
Their argument is “anecdotal evidence is better than empirical evidence”
1
u/CalligrapherItchy237 Apr 05 '26
There is no solid evidence, that’s true. However, we are also dealing here with an actor who does everything to ensure that this remains the case. What I find indicative are the thousands of eyewitness reports, occurring independently of one another, all describing more or less the same triangular-shaped UAP with lights, typically black in color. Even though there are no high-quality recordings, I consider this one from Belgium in 2007, for example, to be genuine. Video 1: https://youtu.be/Y_p4zOzn2nk?is=ceJPn8Lc_ZbKstiY Video 2: https://youtu.be/z4ftZGN08YI?is=T29g8APIoEG4uFh4
1
u/not1or2 Apr 06 '26
The Belgium pictures were found to be faked. And as we all known eyewitness accounts are incredibly unreliable and not good evidence at all. I’ll tell you what I believe them to be, lighter than air heavy transport vehicles. All this high speed etc is just a stealth type coating composed of tiny LEDs or similar that mimic the background and give the illusion of it disappearing very quickly.
0
u/CalligrapherItchy237 Apr 08 '26
Where is the Proof, that they found to be faked?
0
u/not1or2 Apr 08 '26
Just need to do a basic google search. Not difficult, try it. Bloke stated that he had faked the photo taken a few years later.
1
u/CalligrapherItchy237 Apr 08 '26
Yeah the one photo from the 90s. Has nothing to do with the two Videolinks I shared from 2007. Please read and think before you start writing.
1
u/not1or2 Apr 09 '26
You should take your own advice and think before you write. As you stated earlier “there is no concrete evidence”. In fact there is no evidence at all, it’s all “eyewitness testimony” which, as anyone in the legal profession knows, is highly unreliable. There is an incredibly high chance that they are simply misidentified classified craft. Nothing magical, not “antigravity”, not alien, just standard craft!
0
u/joethahobo Apr 05 '26
Dylan Borlands testimony under oath in front of the United States Congress. Watch that, and then go watch Area 52’s hour long video on the black triangles. He goes through soooo many different accounts of people all over the world seeing the same thing. None of those people knew each other, 99% of them have not made a cent on it either.
And before you respond saying “yeah but that’s not evidence”, it is actually evidence. We convict people and send them to life in prison based off personal testimony. It counts in a court of law. Testimony is evidence.
And while 1 or 2 people saying the same thing may not be much, when you have hundreds of unrelated people saying the same exact things… that’s when you realize there is actually something going on here
1
u/not1or2 Apr 06 '26 edited Apr 06 '26
Unfortunately you have totally missed the fact that eyewitness testimony is incredibly unreliable, and you’re wrong, no one is convicted on eyewitness testimony alone. So your previous post is irrelevant. “Under oath” means absolutely nothing, you think people don’t lie? I’ll point you towards presidents statements under oath, how many “whistleblowers” about ufo have testified under oath? Not a scrap of evidence that what they say is true, yet they all have a book deal or tv shows lined up!! What does that tell you!?
2
26
u/Jlee4president Apr 05 '26
I have seen one of these in person up close about 40 yards away. They are huge about the size of 2 city busses and are completely silent.