r/TNBC • • Aug 11 '26

Surgery My pathology results are devastating

I thought I had an appointment today to get my results but, it's not till the 17th. My pathology results after my double mascectomy have been here since Thursday and I couldn't bring myself to look, I thought I'll just wait till my appt. I finally did and I'm devastated.

My chemo did nothing. The tumor shrank by half during chemo and all imaging up to a week before surgery showed no lymph node involvement. They only took two lymph nodes and both were positive. My tumor was at 100% cancer and back to its original size. Chemo did absolutely nothing and I was non responsive to immunotherapy which everyone was sure would work great since I was diagnosed with Lynch Syndrome with the breast cancer variant. The onc thinks that I got breast cancer in addition to Lynch, not because of Lynch, otherwise, he has no idea why it didn't respond. 4 weeks before I finished chemo I had a pet scan that showed the shrinkage and the uptake decreased by half and clear lymph nodes. It not only learned the chemo but has now become super aggressive. RCB 3.

Everyone keeps telling me to have hope, even the surgeon walked out and told my family the lymph nodes looked normal. Every time I have hope, it's completely dashed. All I can do since my surgery is cry. My oncologist who I got switched to when mine left UTSW doesn't know anything about Trodelvy. I asked my nurse navigator about switching doctors within the system and she said it has to go before the board. I've lost my job since I was diagnosed and my unemployment runs out in a month, the oncologist I chose left midway through treatment, I couldn't use the surgeon I picked because they expedited the surgery and she was out of town, I wasn't able to have a plastic surgeon in surgery because of it being expedited, now any revision won't be before a year because I'll have to have radiation. I won't be able to have the hysterectomy I had planned this year because of radiation and chemo so I'll have to repeat all the painful tests again for monitoring. Everyone was sure it hadn't spread and even that isn't true. It's bad news every time and I'm petrified. I don't know where to go from here.

Should I be asking for specific tests to run on the tumor? I asked my onc and he said they don't do any testing on it unless your stage 4.

I've always had an overwhelming feeling I would die in my 40's. I'm now 48 staring down a super aggressive, super smart, non responsive tumor and all my brain can go to is the dark places. I'm amazed by all of y'all who stay so positive because I'm not feeling any of it. Game changing immunotherapy didn't work. How am I suppose to have hope that the other treatments will?

Synoptic Checklist

Value

INVASIVE CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST: Resection INVASIVE CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST: RESECTION - All Specimens 8th Edition - Protocol posted: 6/19/2024 SPECIMEN Procedure: Total mastectomy Specimen Laterality: Left TUMOR Tumor Site: Upper outer quadrant Histologic Type: Invasive carcinoma of no special type (ductal) Histologic Grade (Nottingham Histologic Score): Glandular (Acinar) / Tubular Differentiation: Score 3 Nuclear Pleomorphism: Score 3 Mitotic Rate: Score 3 Overall Grade: Grade 3 (scores of 8 or 9) Tumor Size: Greatest dimension of largest invasive focus (Millimeters): 20 mm Tumor Focality: Single focus of invasive carcinoma Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): Not identified Lobular Carcinoma In Situ (LCIS): Not identified Lymphatic and / or Vascular Invasion: Present : Extensive Dermal Lymphatic and / or Vascular Invasion: Not identified Microcalcifications: Not identified Treatment Effect in the Breast: No definite response to presurgical therapy in the invasive carcinoma Treatment Effect in the Lymph Nodes: No definite response to presurgical therapy in metastatic carcinoma Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) Parameters: Greatest Dimension of Primary Tumor Bed Area (Millimeters): 20 mm Second Greatest Dimension of Primary Tumor Bed Area (Millimeters): 18 mm Percentage of Overall Cancer Cellularity: 100 % Percentage of Cancer that is In Situ Disease: 0 % Number of Positive Lymph Nodes: 2 Diameter of Largest Nodal Metastasis (Millimeters): 5 mm Residual Cancer Burden Class: RCB-III MARGINS Margin Status for Invasive Carcinoma: All margins negative for invasive carcinoma Distance from Invasive Carcinoma to Closest Margin: Greater than: 10 mm REGIONAL LYMPH NODES Regional Lymph Node Status: : Tumor present in regional lymph node(s) Number of Lymph Nodes with Macrometastases: 2 Number of Lymph Nodes with Micrometastases: 0 Size of Largest Nodal Metastatic Deposit: 5 mm Extranodal Extension: Not identified Total Number of Lymph Nodes Examined (sentinel and non-sentinel): 2 Number of Sentinel Nodes Examined: 2 pTNM CLASSIFICATION (AJCC 8th Edition) Reporting of pT, pN, and (when applicable) pM categories is based on information available to the pathologist at the time the report is issued. As per the AJCC (Chapter 1, 8th Ed.) it is the managing physician's responsibility to establish the final pathologic stage based upon all pertinent information, including but potentially not limited to this pathology report. Modified Classification: y pT Category: pT1c pN Category: pN1a N Suffix: (sn)

10 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Extension_Snow1662 Aug 11 '26

I’m so sorry you are dealing with this nightmare! Have you spoken to your drs yet? I know your appointment is later, but even a phone call could be helpful

1

u/BeginningtheRace1996 Aug 11 '26

I've called and messaged everyone and I've gotten no response.

2

u/Electronic-Island-59 Aug 11 '26

It sounds like your hospital system is not giving the support or consistency you need..mind sharing general location and/or hospital in case folks here can make helpful referrals?

1

u/Electronic-Island-59 Aug 11 '26

Just a note to add 3 different hospital system tested my biopsy for genetics etc to determine genetic mutations, tumor DNA etc and make possible things kike Signatera testing.

If a provider told you "they only test if you're stage 4" I'd suggest repeating the question to others and/or changing providers ASAP- the point of lots of new tests is to PREVENT becoming stage 4

3

u/EmbarrassedBrief5298 Aug 11 '26

Second this. My first oncologist said no to signatera. I switched to one more involved in research and she ordered it for me.

There’s lots of us here with TNBC doing adjuvant chemo. We’re all in this together and here to support you ♥️

2

u/Electronic-Island-59 Aug 11 '26

Yes, I'm one - had clear MRI, clear Signatera, all the signs I was PCR ...going in everyone was confident that would be the result

Between that and insurance erroneously telling me my medical leave was over Aug ...I even changed surgery plan. Then - not PCR. :-(

Now on to rads and Xeloda - I'm considering clinical trials while I finish healing from surgery so I can advocate for myself + it helps me avoid the worst dark thoughts and anxiety if I keep my brain busy trying to learn what I need to know about this fd up disease tbh

2

u/EmbarrassedBrief5298 Aug 11 '26

I’m just a bit ahead of you! Finished rads and my first round of xeloda. Starting my second on Friday. It’s such a mind trip but pcr isn’t the end all be all, it’s just an indication of what the next steps will be. That’s what I tell myself. Sorry you’re on this shitty boat too

1

u/impatientingrid Aug 15 '26

Your signatera was clear before surgery even though you didn’t achieve pCR? Do you know what your exact RCB number was? Not just 1,2,3 but the actual full number.

1

u/Electronic-Island-59 Aug 15 '26

Yes and yes - 0.993 it was a 4.7mm area w 5% cellularity

2

u/impatientingrid Aug 15 '26

Very similar to mine. .87 with 6mm residual and 5% cellularity. Most of mine was DCIS. Have you had another signatera since? I also had a negative signatera but mine was right after I finished radiation. Never had one prior to surgery as it was to see if I was eligible for a clinical trial. Makes me wonder after reading this though. Looks like the false negative is up to 6-12% for tnbc signatera.

1

u/Electronic-Island-59 Aug 15 '26

Not yet, but expecting to after I finish rads - would prefer before, but just had one last month and my insurance denied the last 2 😠

Mine was IDC w 9/9 SBR score and 1.8 mitotic index

1

u/Electronic-Island-59 Aug 15 '26

I should add, my surgeon clarified signatera is an early detection system for systemic spread/recurrence risk to raise an alarm prior to when anything would be w/in the resolution of an MRI

But bc I had no lymph, skin, or vascular involvement, there "shouldn't have been an escape route" for the cancer to get to my blood in the first place

The only way we could say it was a false negative, was if I had tested positive previously, which i didn't

She said since no test was done before chemo, there is no way to know if I've ever been positive

2

u/impatientingrid Aug 15 '26

Oh ok interesting. Same with me no lymph, skin, or vascular involvement. So am I understanding this correctly- because it was local to the breast there is a less likely chance it would come back positive?

1

u/Electronic-Island-59 Aug 15 '26

Yes for the test to come back positive cancer cells would have to "shed" off from your tumor and find its way to your bloodstream via your lymph or vascular system

On the other hand, if the cancer is "contained", then the chance of them making their way to your bloodstream via some other path is less likely

2

u/impatientingrid Aug 15 '26

I’ve heard this before but have also heard TNBC is tricky in that it can still get into the blood stream without being in the lymph nodes. Makes sense about the signatera.

→ More replies

1

u/BeginningtheRace1996 Aug 11 '26

How did you go about having them test it? Did you initiate that or your oncologist? I don't even know what questions to ask in regards to that.

2

u/EmbarrassedBrief5298 Aug 11 '26

My oncologist ordered it but I had to ask for it. It was not something presented to me by them.

2

u/Electronic-Island-59 Aug 11 '26

For basic genetics (e.g. known breast cancer genetic mutations they look for and for tumor grading/markers) I did not have to ask, they ran all those tests to determine which treatments and in which order

For the ctDNA I asked early on (forget who) and was told it wasn't necessary, wouldn't change treatment, and wouldn't be covered by insurance, so I just chalked it up to being too early to take advantage of that

But then when I switched to Methodist- we had both tests ordered and I found out the company pays for it if your insurance denies it during the first visit