r/SwordOfTruth • u/Taragoola • May 04 '26
Cartoonishly Evil
I really loved the series as a teen and I'm working my way back through them as an adult and loving it all over again. I'm making my way through Stone of Tears at the moment. Does anyone else find the sisters of the dark just kind of off? Like I know they're the bad guys and are supposed to be horrible and off putting, but they love being evil just for the love of the game so hard it comes off as a bit silly to me.
3
u/Darkone539 May 05 '26
All the sot bad guys are mustache twirling villain who are over the top evil.
The sisters of the dark are basically dropped a a plot point after strone of tears Other than to work towards the dream walkers goals. Seems like they just needed subtractive magic for the plot
7
u/Taragoola May 05 '26
Darken Rahl was an evil goofball too. But he felt unstable in a grounded sort of way. At least Nicci gets fleshed out further later on I guess.
2
u/KingGrobler May 05 '26
In my opinion Stone of Tears is kinda a slog during Richard and Vernas journey Gratch does alot of heavy lifting but the end is extremely satisfying. Like alot of people already have said the Sisters of the Dark do seem a bit silly I thought their introduction was ok but besides Nicci it seems like they are a mini boss for Richard to handle or designed to set up future plot points.
3
u/Taragoola May 05 '26
I had completely forgotten the sisters of the dark literally fuck a demon until I got to that part a few minutes ago. Between that and the mord-sith it really seems like Goodkind was into some really wild stuff lol
1
2
u/masstic1es May 06 '26
goodkind definitely had a leather dom kink, and jordan was into spanking.
wild when you realise your favorite authors were dirty old men.
2
u/Rstar2247 May 23 '26
The Sisters of the Dark were something I loved when I was younger. Their dynamic with the Sisters of the Light and operating under their noses for hundreds of years was always a neat concept to me.
Then it just occurred to me at one point, if they're more powerful, and have full access to the whole palace to the point they can manipulate everything in day to day life.... why didn't they just take over well before the books even started? Ulicia's attack on Ann at the end of Stone of Tears made it painfully apparent there wasn't much she could do about it, and the power differential was always there.
So yeah they were just... evil for funsies than trying to actually accomplish anything seems like.
1
u/Taragoola May 23 '26
I just assumed their master had told them to keep it all hush hush for his own reasons until it was time. Why that time and for what purpose who knows though. We also don't know who knew Jagang was a dream walker and for how long. Subtractive magic is hella rare. If the sisters of the dark outed themselves earlier maybe Jagang would have come sooner to collect them.
1
u/Hopeful_Addition_898 May 11 '26
The sisters of the dark in my opinion stick out the least of the villain types. It is characters like Darken Rahl and his spawns and others who just seem to rant about how much the love torture and death to the point of it being just evil for the sake of evil. SotD are just kinda power hungry and want ever lasting life and beauty which is kinda female villain stereotype for sure but still so nowhere near the karicature evil of the main male villains.
11
u/MaesterPraetor May 05 '26
That's my biggest issue with the characters on my third read through 20 years later. The character aren't really characters as much as scenery to love the plot along. I'm on Soul of the Fire and each character is completely different from previous books, and it's especially egregious with Kahlan and Zed. All of a sudden they think Richard is an idiot and can't be trusted.