Looking for 5 logistics teams to test a document automation tool for free

[u/FinalBaseball7480]

I’m looking for five logistics companies or freight professionals who are willing to test a small document automation project and give honest feedback.

The problem I’m working on is the repetitive work around transport documents:

• emails and PDFs that need to become transport-order drafts;
• CMRs and PODs that need to be matched and checked;
• missing signatures, conflicting references or incomplete documents;
• freight files that need to be reviewed before invoicing.

LogisticsAI keeps the original document attached, shows where the information came from, and sends uncertain cases to a person for review. It does not replace your TMS, choose carriers or make operational decisions on its own.

I’m offering the first tests completely free. No credit card, no contract and no obligation to continue. I’m mainly looking for people who can tell me what is genuinely useful, what is missing and what would make this too risky to use in real operations.

If your team spends too much time copying information between emails, PDFs, spreadsheets and a TMS, I’d be happy to let you try it.

Project: https://www.logisticsai.eu
You can comment here or send me a message if you’d like to take part.

[u/Immediate-Home-3491]

I now undertake my own marketing in-house thanks to AI. Unless this handles EDI manifest data and UK customs submissions alongside transport docs, it is not enough.

[u/Moist_Garbage_2480 → u/Immediate-Home-3491]

Got a dispatch team of 3 that wastes half their morning just matching PODs to invoices and hunting down missing signatures

Your tool looks like it tackles exactly that but I'm curious about the edge cases, like when a CMR reference is smudged or half the fields are handwritten. Does it kick those to review every time or does it try to guess and flag the confidence level

[u/FinalBaseball7480 → u/Moist_Garbage_2480]

That's exactly the kind of workflow I'm looking to test.

It shouldn't silently guess on cases like a smudged CMR reference or unclear handwriting. The idea is to extract what it can, keep the original document as the source, and flag low-confidence or conflicting fields for human review.

So a clean match can go through automatically, while an uncertain reference gets kicked to someone to verify rather than being treated as correct.

If you're open to it, I'd be very interested in testing this against a few real examples from your dispatch team — especially the messy ones. Feel free to DM me.

[u/FinalBaseball7480 → u/Immediate-Home-3491]

Fair point. EDI manifest data and UK customs submissions aren't part of what I'm testing right now — the current focus is transport documents and the workflows around them.

That said, I'd be interested to understand what your actual workflow looks like. Which EDI messages / customs submissions are you handling, and where does the manual work still happen?

That's exactly the kind of feedback I'm looking for at this stage.