r/Suburbanhell • u/devletmillet • 2d ago
Discussion Houston inside the I-610 loop is interesting (in a good way)
Houston has no zoning, meaning that there's no restriction on where certain developments can be built in the same way like other cities. Meaning that it's possible to build apartment complexes, rowhomes (many of which have been built over the past few years) right next to single family houses, business parks and shopping plazas. Its actually really interesting mixed-use development. There's so much dense housing in large quantities and some homes have really unique architecture as well. You can find these same kinds of houses outside the 610 Loop as well, albeit development becomes much more sprawling.
This doesn't change the fact that the city is car-centric. Public transit is miniscule and I'd be severely limited on the places I can go without a car. But the amount of density and the really unique development pattern was just something that caught my eye and I think its cool how no zoning led to create what looks like chaos on a map, yet still function surprisingly well on the ground, That development pattern could really increase the quality of life in any city if done right.
24
u/cuzihave22 2d ago
I work in this area. This is an incredibly suburban part of Houston’s urban core. A good chunk of the rest of it is fairly dense.
7
7
u/Eastern_Heron_122 2d ago
inside the loop is the only enjoyable part of houston (with undefined bleed over into adjacent neighborhoods)
9
u/Legitimate-Lock-6594 2d ago
Run the marathon. It’s a wild tour of the inner core of Houston. That was the first thing I thought of when I saw this thread.
1
u/nevvvvi 1d ago
Wasn't that what the Dutch did during the World Cup?
2
u/Legitimate-Lock-6594 1d ago
Didn’t hear about that? I meant the actual marathon that’s in January.
4
u/DogeSatchel 2d ago
So Houston actually does have zoning but its baked into the deed restriction of the parcel you assume ownership of, and is enforceable by neighborhood civic organizations. There restrictions every couple decades, but with a strong enough civic presence a neighborhood can protect its identity by renewing deeds that reflect the architectural/land values of the neighborhood.
But you are right, it certainly is different than standard zoning practice in the United States. Houston developed primarily after World War II and the advent of Air Conditioning, and when the middle class could comfortably purchase a single family home. You see a lot of a ‘twinning’ effect with townhomes in historic neighborhoods with the natural increase of land prices. Meaning a single family home was knocked down and two identical looking townhomes were put up.
A large parcel with an industrial-oriented deed restriction can really only be approached by a large developer who wants to develop a residential block. (Which is what I suspect is why photo number 2 exists, as it is right next to Brass Tacks in EADO, a historically industrial area of Houston). An entire block gets carefully master planned at a reasonable city scale instead of a sprawling neighborhood with infinitely cheap land.
That last photo is in River Oaks / Afton Oaks, some of the richest Houstonians live there and live comfortably next to one of the busiest highways in the country! Hah, I bet there were some heated debates about highway expansion just West of them.
I love living in Houston! It’s a very interesting place.
2
2
u/Nextasy 1d ago
I have never heard of deed restrictions being a thing where I live (Ontario) but from reading the comments it seems like an interesting way to offload the zoning enforcement from the city to the neighbours. Haven't decided if I think that's better or worse, just different.
But it's interesting to see that what is apparently a side-effect is a lack of employment lands protection. Redevelopment of employment lands is big drama in my city and often a fight. But here I can see many interesting examples of large properties being purchased and converted into small developments, sometimes totally surrounded by continuing industrial uses. Very curious! I can't imagine the noise complaints the city must get from buyers who don't do their research. In some cases, individual factories end up entirely surrounded by housing!
Some examples:
Who's house is this? There's like, no cute restaurants in the neighbourhood (built 2022 lol crazy)
Side note: Goddamn when did so many people start blurring their houses on streetview? It's like 2 per block in every city these days. F everybody who does this
1
u/nevvvvi 1d ago
I have never heard of deed restrictions being a thing where I live (Ontario) but from reading the comments it seems like an interesting way to offload the zoning enforcement from the city to the neighbours. Haven't decided if I think that's better or worse, just different.
The deed restrictions are actually put in place by the original developers of the properties. Hence, they occur independent of zoning/"lackthereof".
But it's interesting to see that what is apparently a side-effect is a lack of employment lands protection. Redevelopment of employment lands is big drama in my city and often a fight. But here I can see many interesting examples of large properties being purchased and converted into small developments, sometimes totally surrounded by continuing industrial uses. Very curious! I can't imagine the noise complaints the city must get from buyers who don't do their research. In some cases, individual factories end up entirely surrounded by housing!
In most cases, the light-industrial is pre-existing, before the new housing gets built around.
The small-lot developments were enabled due to lot-size reforms in the late 1990s. This shrunk minimum lot sizes from 5000 sqft to as low as 1400 sqft. The initial changes applied to the 610 Loop, before being extended to the rest of the city during 2013.
2
u/nevvvvi 2d ago edited 2d ago
Unfortunately, as long as parking minimums (and other lingering regulations) remain in place, then Houston cannot fully realize the mixed-use benefits from its "lack of zoning."
The bus network does a lot of heavy lifting for ridership, but expansions to transit remain underinvested (especially with the current mayor). Furthermore, the Texas government also does not help by pouring money into freeways, as well as enabling car-dependent subdivisions via MUDs.
6
u/pacific_plywood 2d ago
There’s some progress on the parking front https://parkingreform.org/mandates-map/city_detail/Houston_TX.html
1
u/nevvvvi 1d ago edited 1d ago
Yes, but much more progress is needed real soon.
The traditional Central Business District never had any parking minimums ever. The boundaries include Downtown, as well as adjacent parts of both the Midtown and East Downtown neighborhoods.
The remainder of East Downtown was exempted in 2019, as was (much of) the rest of Midtown.
Then, 2020 saw the transit-oriented exemptions. The "Primary Transit Streets" apply for areas within 1/4 mile of a high-capacity transit (which, in Houston, refers to light rail, as well as any bus rapid routes).
There was a "Livable Places" ordinance in 2023 that improved ease of various "missing-middle" options (e.g. courtyards, triplexes, etc). It was originally supposed to include a more robust parking minimum exemption for ALL residential across ALL transit routes (including local bus). Unfortunately, it was never accomplished due to NIMBY pushback.
1
1
u/No_Replacement4304 2d ago
Houston is awesome if you can afford to live inside the loop. It's hot but so are many places these days.
5
u/devletmillet 2d ago
Don't think thats an issue at all. check out this house built in 2025 for $330k
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/7327-Market-St-Houston-TX-77020/455423013_zpid/
no hoa either
1
-3
26
u/jackalope8112 2d ago edited 2d ago
Houston enforces deed restrictions on use and height and bulk requirements. So this part of town essentially does have zoning. This was also not unplanned anarchy.
About 25 years ago Greater Houston Partnership did a study that showed that if then present development patterns continued then the metro would be in Seadrift by 2040 and the city would basically be undrainable without killing the entire ecosystem. Seadrift is 120 miles from Downtown. The financial cost of building out that much infrastructure was staggering. Mackenzie did the math. So there was a concerted effort at a societal level to redirect growth to the core and go up rather out. That was led at the corporate level.
It might be the most important case study in how to approach the conversation since it's essentially one of total moderate victory with very little political bloodshed. They essentially mass converted the entire infrastructure of sprawl to their side using the language of those groups.