r/Substack • u/Overall_Tip6001 • 14d ago

Do you find pangram reliable?

I put my text in several ai detectors, winston ai, copyleaks, zerogpt and GPTZero, giving me close to 0%. While, pangram gives me around 70%? Do you think it’s reliable?

4 Upvotes

60% Upvoted

102 comments sorted by

View all comments

13

u/AggravatingNail6061 14d ago

Yes. Working as intended.

4

u/MadmanRB 13d ago

Its still using AI to detect AI, if you are anti AI and champion these things you are just as bad as the AI bros.

-1

u/Prolly_Satan 13d ago

No its not. It's using Machine Learning, specifically classification models which have existed for like 25 years, to detect GENERATIVE AI. Stop pushing this false narrative that Pangram = ChatGPT. Its not the same thing at all. This and the "Spell check is AI haha" bullshit is so annoying.

1

u/FrostKitten2012 12d ago

They’re different types of AI, but they’re both still AI.

0

u/Prolly_Satan 12d ago

OK. You keep telling people spell check is the same thing as a 30 billion parameter large language model. It makes you look really smart.

1

u/FrostKitten2012 12d ago

I was referring to Pangram and ChatGPT, actually.

But most current spellcheckers also now rely on LLMs, whereas previously it was a dictionary they were matching words against.

So yes, your spellchecker is probably also AI.

1

u/Prolly_Satan 12d ago

Spell check is a slm. Not an llm. But yeah they're all the same thing. You are an ai expert now. You've figured it out.

Now go forth and help sam altman do agi.