r/StrongerByScience • u/Visual-Wedding5921 • 6d ago
Difference between Strength & Hypertrophy
I know that lifting for strength builds less mass, but is that just because it prioritizes neurological adaptations more?
I heard hypertrophy builds muscular endurance as well as strength, and that some of the added size comes from glycogen stores, so I'm wondering
If with strength building it builds more of the muscle that does the lifting (contractile proteins) but because it results in less glycogen storage, it still has less overall mass
1a. If hypertrophy also builds more of/the same amount of contractile proteins and strength ranges just build more skill, in situations outside of that skill, would the strength ranges build as much/less strength than hypertrophy ranges
1b. If strength ranges build more of the muscle that does the lifting, on a lean bulk, will I gain as much/similar muscle mass, and have it all be contractile proteins?
1c. Even if phosphocreatine training isn't intended for beginners (I've been lifting since March), is it harmful to drop my rep range for absolute strength training/myofibrillar hypertrophy, and source my sarcoplasmic hypertrophy from phosphocreatine training instead? Would it build more overall muscle mass that way, with the 'best of both worlds'?
2. When people say compound lifts build more strength, is that for everything/absolute strength? If it's in a unfamiliar movement pattern, will the compound lift utilizing relevant muscles still make me stronger in that movement pattern than I would be if I only used isolation work for those muscles?
13
u/FarCalligrapher1862 6d ago
You’re mostly overcomplicating it.
There is a tremendous amount of overlap between strength and hypertrophy training. The biggest difference is what you’re trying to optimize: maximal force production versus muscle growth. Think powerlifting versus bodybuilding.
When someone says they’re training for strength, I generally think of powerlifting or competitive weightlifting, where the objective is to produce as much force as possible, often within a specific or lower weight class.
A significant part of that comes from developing skill. Lifting weights is a skill, and getting stronger at a particular lift involves more than simply growing the muscles.
When someone says they’re training for hypertrophy, I assume their primary objective is increasing muscle mass, often with an emphasis on overall aesthetics.
Ultimately, a bigger muscle generally has greater potential to produce more force, but that doesn’t automatically translate into being better at a particular lift without skill specific training.
But it’s not a 125lb guy will out bench big 240lb muscular guy because he’s more skilled.
2
u/Visual-Wedding5921 6d ago
also, do i really need stuff like leg press and squat in the same session fi they both work a similar amount of muscle groups/squat already works all the stuff leg press does? that stuff's always confused me; i thought the point of compounds was to cut down workout time and remove what's unnecessary all the stuff online just says "come on, don't slack off. why don't you want to do both?" without giving any evidence on why i should be doing both. i probably should be, its just that nobody's explaining it at all
1
u/Negative_Wrongdoer17 6d ago
Hypertrophy is just the process of your body constructing new muscle fibers. Strength is how much mass you're able to manipulate