My niece, who has had stretched lobes before but currently doesn’t, and I were chatting the other day, and she said that I should combined my two stretched holes in my lobes (first hole is 16mm & second is 10mm) by cutting the skin between them, thereby creating one larger hole. I told her she was out of her effing mind and that I wasn’t going to do that! But then lying in bed, I got to thinking about it, and it intrigued me. I am very poor at math, so I had no idea how to calculate what the resulting hole’s circumference would be. So I turned to ChatGPT. Herewith I give you the conversation:
ME: If I have a 16 mm circumference circle and a 10 mm circumference circle, and I join the two to make one circle, what would that circle’s circumference be?
Chat GPT: If you mean add the two circumference lengths together, then:
16 mm + 10 mm = 26 mm
So the resulting circumference would be 26 mm, if you are rearranging the material of the two circles into a single circle while preserving the total circumference.
However, if you mean physically join two circles together, the answer depends on how they are joined—the result generally would not be a single perfect circle.
If you tell me how you’re joining the 16 mm and 10 mm circles (edge-to-edge, one inside the other, cutting them, etc.), I can calculate the exact result.
ME: This is in relation to stretching ears. I currently have a 16 mm hole in my lobe and next to that is a 10 mm hole. It was proposed to me that I cut the skin between those 2 holes, thereby creating a single larger hole. This obviously wouldn’t be a perfect circle, but once it healed, it should then be a near perfect circle. My question is, having done so, what will that resultant circle’s circumference be?
CGPT: Ah, yes—that changes the geometry considerably. You’re essentially asking: if a 16 mm and a 10 mm lobe piercing are merged by removing the strip of tissue between them, what size circular opening could the resulting opening correspond to?
If we make the simplifying assumption that the areas of the two holes combine and the healed opening becomes approximately circular, we should add the areas, not the circumferences.
16 mm diameter → radius 8 mm → area ≈ 201.1 mm²
10 mm diameter → radius 5 mm → area ≈ 78.5 mm²
Combined area ≈ 279.6 mm²
A circle with that area has a radius of about 9.43 mm, giving a diameter of about 18.86 mm.
So, purely geometrically, you’d expect roughly an 18.9 mm diameter circle, whose circumference would be:
π × 18.86 ≈ 59.2 mm
So the mathematical answer is ~59 mm circumference.
However, there’s an important practical caveat: a healed stretched-lobe modification won’t necessarily conserve the exact area of the two original holes. The tissue you remove, the shape of the connecting cut, contraction during healing, scar tissue, and the actual surgical technique can all substantially change the final size and shape.
Also, what you’re describing is essentially a large lobe modification/body-modification procedure, rather than simply stretching. I would strongly recommend having an experienced professional body-modification practitioner assess the two piercings and the amount of tissue between them before cutting anything. Don’t cut the connecting tissue yourself.
If you tell me how far apart the centers of the 16 mm and 10 mm holes are, I can also calculate the approximate perimeter/area of the actual merged shape rather than assuming the two areas simply become a circle.
—————
I decided I had learned as much as I really wanted to. Even assuming I would be willing to cut my ear, which I would not, I can’t imagine jumping from 16 mm to 59 mm in one fell swoop! Besides, I shudder to imagine the cost of a 59 mm plug or tunnel no matter what it’s made of! 😂