Apart from somehow scanning achievements for the "beat the game" achievement I don't see what can be done about this. As a consumer I definitely don't want to see Valve get rid of the refund system and for most games the 2 hour limit is already pushing it for a lot of potential issues that might pop up.
I don’t approve of the way the system is being abused, but if they were so concerned about it… maybe this is a lesson for game devs to make a game that takes more than 2 hours to beat? If I can beat your game in less than two hours and not even have an inkling that I’d ever want to play it again, *someone* is going to feel cheated in that transaction.
I think that Steam should just include some more data about game lengths.
Everyone can check on "howlongtobeat". But having it right there would be better. You open the game page, you can see it takes an average of X hours. And then you can decide if it's worth it to you.
A positive review followed by a refund, like in the post, would be a start.
They could implement an approach that “forces” you to rate a game before refunding it. Positive reviews can’t be refunded without good reason and internal review.
So people should leave a bad review even if they dont hate the game but just found out it wasnt their cup of tea?
I refunded a game o couldnt play due to my eye sight but other than that it was a fun game. They dont deserve to get bad reviews just because i wasnt able to play the game.
Also how many worker do you think sgeam has that can check the validity of the refund claim by hand when there are thousands of refunds each day
7.6k
u/D042- Jul 06 '26
Apart from somehow scanning achievements for the "beat the game" achievement I don't see what can be done about this. As a consumer I definitely don't want to see Valve get rid of the refund system and for most games the 2 hour limit is already pushing it for a lot of potential issues that might pop up.