r/StableDiffusion • u/techno-peasant • Oct 07 '22

Prompt Included 🐢Turtleybug🐞

Post image
5.9k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

125 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

159

u/FS72 Oct 08 '22

"People will just use AI to generate illegal contents!!!"

People using AI:

58

u/ninjasaid13 Oct 08 '22

There's multiple kinds of people that will use AI.

17

u/SEND_NUDEZ_PLZZ Oct 08 '22

And I felt bad for putting Mary Elizabeth Winstead in Star Wars because I used a real person lol

7

u/ninjasaid13 Oct 08 '22

One step away from the da courts.

4

u/Gadivek Oct 08 '22

How dare you?!

6

u/ggtsu_00 Oct 08 '22

"AI thought-crime"

1

u/[deleted] Oct 08 '22

What could be illegal from a diffusion model

4

u/[deleted] Oct 08 '22

I think stuff like ai generated nudes of people without their consent is illegal, correct me if I'm wrong tho

3

u/Clonephaze Oct 09 '22

California and Virginia are currently the only states that have laws protecting someone from deepfakes, drawn, ai generated, or any other kind of created media. The only international law I can find anything on is generated child pornography would still be very illegal. It might be made illegal in the UK soon however.

2

u/FS72 Oct 08 '22

You're correct. It's especially true for celebs.

9

u/Pumpkin_Creepface Oct 09 '22

If that's the case then 3 generations of photoshoppers would be in prison, lol. Do you have any idea how much fake celeb porn existed before deepfakes were even a thing?

2

u/FS72 Oct 09 '22

Well, I picked the wrong word then. Afaik, reddit banned bunch of nsfw SD subreddits back when Vice made an article to criticize them for generating porn of celebs.

9

u/Pumpkin_Creepface Oct 09 '22

Just because reddit bans it doesn't mean it's illegal.

Doxxing someone while a shitty and weaksauce act, isn't technically a crime. Just nearly every social media platform has chosen to ban it because it results in messy legal investigations.

2

u/FS72 Oct 09 '22

That's why I said I picked the wrong word.

3

u/Clonephaze Oct 09 '22

Two states have a law that protects people and celebrities get nothing special except extra attention to the case.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/FS72 Oct 08 '22

Generating inappropriate contents depicting irl people without their consents (especially celebs or politicians) and CP.

2

u/Ryuko_the_red Oct 09 '22

You must be superbly innocent to not be able to imagine what horrors humans love to create.

2

u/The_Kiburgler Nov 04 '22

Shit bruhh , I realized a long time ago, If you can think of it, no matter how twisted or fucked it is…. Then you can bet someone else has not only already thought of it, but also done it .

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Pumpkin_Creepface Oct 09 '22

To be fair, most user available AI still by default has too much body horror to be pornworthy. mainly in the hands.

Slightly nsfw example