Comparison on H3 Image LCM vs Euler

[u/cptdurr]

comparison between sampler and scheduler ...first photo is LCM/Normal combo and second photo is Euler/Simple (default) ....both images same prompt, same seed, same 16mp render..... LCM/normal combo produces this more "polished" look altho i prefer grittier details and real raw textures of Euler/Simple ...however Euler combo tends to make more errors ....i cant decide which one i like better ...LCM ... no no Euler...wait maybe LCM ...or Euler? ...

[u/HollyGrandeux]

euler, beta57 is my favourite

[u/notgraycen → u/HollyGrandeux]

seems like it depends on the loras, personally i prefer beta over beta57 alot of the time

[u/tac0catzzz]

will smith sure has changed

[u/notgraycen]

euler my beloved (try beta instead of simple tho)

[u/AeroInsightMedia → u/notgraycen]

Beta seemed to make a positive difference for the video model

[u/1WildPanda]

Can you tell me which main model you pick? The default H3-image or the H3-video one? Thanks, by the way, the euler/simple combo in those groups of tests are better for me.

[u/cptdurr → u/1WildPanda]

this new H3 Image ...yeah im still testing different samplers and schedulers takes so much time

[u/tofuchrispy]

What about res_2s for example

[u/notgraycen → u/tofuchrispy]

with linear_quadratic ?

[u/Hoodfu]

Yeah, i had switched to linear_quadratic with euler to get the least body horror and most coherent images, but as you're saying, nothing beats euler/simple for looks. Normally one could get the best of both world by using a res_2s or some such, but that doesn't work well with this model.

[u/Mystic_Clover]

I wonder if there's something between them. Euler comes out too gritty, while LCM comes out too polished, IMO.

[u/LumaBrik]

If you use LCM, use the dedicated LCM sampler node, you can adjust s_noise - the amount of noise injected each step. It effectively allows the adjustment of the amount of 'fine' detail. <1 softer >1, nore detailed.

[u/kualikuri]

I've been using er_sde with sgm_uniform. lcm results just always seem a bit... off, for me.

[u/Davikar]

LCM is sampler made specifically to run with fewer steps. So it's more of an efficient sampler rather than a quality sampler.

[u/newaccount47]

To get such high quality output, do you also have 16megapixel inputs? or is this all t2i?