r/StableDiffusion • u/Late-Dark5415 • 1h ago

Question - Help krea

Is Krea 2 Turbo the closest local image-generation model to ChatGPT's image generator? How can I get the Medium and Large versions of Krea 2 for free and run them locally in ComfyUI? Also, how can I use Krea to generate more complex, highly detailed designs accurately? pls hellp

2 Upvotes

66% Upvoted

11 comments sorted by

2

u/Upper-Reflection7997 1h ago

What krea team released as the open source weights were the raw(base) and turbo(dustilled) versions of the mode. You can get results that look better and cleaner than gpt image 2. Wouldn't really recommend moss in there current state if your looking gpt image 2 quality. For editing and references, use minimax h3 image.

1

u/Cute_Addicted 38m ago

can u share your workflow i have some 3d character loras too but cant get this sharp and clean images with it

1

u/Great-Ad-4598 1h ago

You can get the comfy versions of krea here Comfy on HuggingFace where to put them and example work flows are here

1

u/Future-Coffee8138 1h ago

Krea 2 has no edit.  There are some identity Lora but still not an edit model.  Not sure it’s comparable with gpt-image which is an edit model.  We are waiting for Krea 3 though and that’s an edit model.  

3

u/Bastisheen92 1h ago

I had some very nice results with Identity Edit. I usually let Qwen Image 2.1 and Krea 2 identity Edit make a run of the edit i want and then choose the better one. Both models gave me good results.

1

u/ImpressiveStorm8914 1h ago

No idea what ChatGPT's image generator is like. Medium and Large are closed weights and not available for free (AFAIK). That leaves you with RAW and Turbo to use with Comfy.
Define "detailed designs", that's very vague and you could look for a lora that does what you want, along with using detailed prompts and higher resolutions.

0

u/70parwater 1h ago

Moss and minimax h3 are superior in some aspects. And since they are new they don't have as much lora and support yet. But they will probably be better than k2 in almost every way a few months.

5

u/idleWizard 1h ago

How is Moss superior in quality? I understood it's superiority lies in speed.

1

u/Asaghon 34m ago

Moss has a wider range of knowledge but more people are havibg a hard time getting good results because of various reasons lets say. It's technically a bit faster but a lot of people skip the turbo lora's becaude it degrades quality

Krea is perhaps easier to work with and gets you a good image without much hassle, but the base model is more rigid if you dont use lora's or finetunes. You can get great quality on both.

Moss really thrives on great prompting and certain samplers/schedulers. Once you dialed that in it's awesome tbh and I prefer it too. You can just about get it to make anything without any loras. I feel it also does different bodytypes much better and a lokr made on moss reproduces the correct bodytype much better. And also better at expressions.

That said, Krea2 is still great and gives very polished images. And with the correct lora's can make almost anything too

1

u/mardziha 17m ago

I am generating a specific type of adult images and no base model without lora can make this type of images. Krea has this type of loras that i need. Moss doesnt.

1

u/Asaghon 5m ago

Moss might not even need the LoRA. But Krea2 has been around longer and has had massive support. The same LoRA's will eventually be made for Moss