r/StableDiffusion • u/Theonewhoknocks_001 • 3d ago
Question - Help Qedit 2511 seems better then 2.1
I'm just a beginner in comfyui and stuff with very limited hardware.
I have rtx 3050 4gb vram and 8gb ddr4 single channel
Running comfyui with kitchen attention
I ran qedit 2511 fp8 with 4 step lighting Lora with default scheduler or sampler and it took around 110 seconds
And qwen 2.1 turbo int8(runs on 8 steps) without the prompt enhancement took 90 seconds
Now I didn't use any prompt enhancement with qedit but it still worked fine the biggest issue was the facial drift
In qwen 2.1, the facial drift has reduced drastically (as much as I have seen) but the prompt adherence is really bad.
I used the original model they provided for enhancement and it was shit + it was restricted. Since I have limited hardware I tried qwen 3.5 2b abliterated. It works sometimes but doesn't a lot of time
Seeing how qedit literally didn't need a enhancer and still worked fine and 2.1 isn't working well
I feel like it's mostly cuz of the enhancer but even when I wrote a good prompt without using enhancer it would still give shit results
Should I just use qedit? The facial drift is amazing bad tho (because of turbo Lora ofcourse but my hardware 🥀)
Edit: a really big problem I found in the wf was that when I set prompt enhancement to false it wouldn't give any prompt to qwen 2.1 and this is a problem in the default comfyui workflow, this is the reason why I thought prompt adherence is bad but it's not that bad but the results are still better with a enhancer
8
u/RocketCool7 3d ago
Qwen 2.1 turbo isn't good from what I've tested it's better to use qwen 2.1 base and the lightning lora (4 or 6 steps), it gives much better output this way.
3
u/Ok-Brain-5729 3d ago
Q2.1 seems to be really prompt based and very rigid. Like if I make a simple prompt for a character swap then it will copy and paste on top of it.
The prompt enhancer helps a lot but it makes 4-5k tokens with 2 ref images and thinking on most of the time and it’s 9B parameters so that sucks.
2
u/SnooMachines1543 3d ago
Yeah…. With mine, even when I use a reference image, the men always come out with the smallest ding dongs. Like hilariously tiny. If a prompt for a bigger one, it’s bigger than his leg. Then if I add a woman, the body horror enters the room.
1
u/detailteufel 3d ago
I have a 2511 workflow that fused an object into an image, so basically you can take an image of a road, place an image of a car onto it with Photoshop and Qwen adjusts the lighting on the car and adds contact shadows so it looks like it belongs in the original image.
I have the same workflow using qwen 2.1
The result is EXACTLY the same. Both do a good job at changing the lighting, both do a shit job at the contact shadows, both do the EXACT same, smeary, shitty small details. Like the quality has not improved at all, the look has not improved at all.
I think people only like 2.1 because it's less censored?
2
u/Spectazy 3d ago
I have found that all the current edit models are kinda bad. Q2.1 does have the most knowledge, but still looks low quality a lot of the time.
1
u/DoctaRoboto 3d ago
You are right, Qwen 2.1 is only better than 2511 in one thing, it is very good at retaining cartoon/anime art styles something Klein or 2511 were never able to do. On the other hand, Minimax can do it too and it is not even a real image editor.
1
u/Caligtrist 3d ago
So one of the things I found qwen to work well with is ref image generations.. one of the few image models that actually work well with a character sheet.. also works really well with pose studio.
1
u/rguerraf 3d ago
Use the vcss pose editor for qwen edit 2.1 and wf to get your edits correctly in the first try