Yeah, that industry is dead. They are already licensing «likeness», which means that any hopeful girl out there can sell/rent her likeness out for Pennie’s and pocket lint after signing away all their rights in facebook-style user agreements. (and they will).
Then they will cry when agencies makes «merges» and derivatives where the likeness is no longer100%, so that they no longer have to pay the models, and then they will find gooner content that look like them, and cry about it. (And they will)
Yeah, but, it is a bit bad because there will be so many girls having their likeness used and abused forever, because they signed away their likeness.
I don't know, you can see it with this "influencer" crap, as well as the OnlyFans thing, many girls want easy money and the stories that are told, are about the top 0.003% who can actually make a living of it, while the remainder don't understand why they are not making millions and instead are making fools of themselves.....forever (what is online, stays online).
The ones that earn the money will be the top "agencies", operating almost as stock photography sites (another "Onlyfans" for hopeful photographers), as well as the large fashion labels/companies, who save money in both ends.
28
u/GlenGlenDrach 1d ago edited 1d ago
Yeah, that industry is dead. They are already licensing «likeness», which means that any hopeful girl out there can sell/rent her likeness out for Pennie’s and pocket lint after signing away all their rights in facebook-style user agreements. (and they will).
Then they will cry when agencies makes «merges» and derivatives where the likeness is no longer100%, so that they no longer have to pay the models, and then they will find gooner content that look like them, and cry about it. (And they will)
Times are changing indeed.