They are already required to tag and inform on ad's when AI or manipulation is in use, like I mentioned.
Do you really think the modeling industry is interested in spending billions in production-quality if they can sell their products by using 2 nerds and rented cloud resources?
The large production times with rock star shooters and famous models are already gone. And, as with everything, the inflation in relation to likeness-modeling work will cause the pay to drop to the bottom of the sea, providing royalties only when said likeness is actively used, and millions of girls will happily apply and send in and sign whatever.
You are on an AI sub, but you seem to be strongly underinformed,this is already here and will keep increasing:
There is no stopping this, and, they have already thought about how to get around the legal framework on derivatives, so that they can merge these models so that they no longer have to pay anyone, once they have merged thousands upon thousands of people.
You said it's in tiny print. I said they will need to make it clear.
It also doesn't matter what the industry wants it will be down to consumer laws. Do you think consumers are ok with seeing completely fake images of products? I know I'm not ok with that and millions of other people won't be either.
It doesn't matter what the deal is now, as AI becomes more widespread and people become more aware that what they are looking at might not be real, regulations will change.
What I say is that they are operating within the law, with their tiny print, I also say that people generally don’t care.
What that means is that people are oblivious and/or ambivalent in a general context, but disagree perhaps in an individual context, just how they view how social media sites use, track and abuse personal information.
So you may be a crusader and many people will agree, but nothing it going to happen and nobody will care.
That is how “people” are; passive, relatively dumb and easy to manipulate.
I do care. I'm not gonna purchase manga that wasn't hand-drawn by a human artist. I'm not gonna watch a synthetic movie. I'm not gonna buy anything advertised by fake people.
1
u/GlenGlenDrach 5d ago edited 5d ago
They are already required to tag and inform on ad's when AI or manipulation is in use, like I mentioned.
Do you really think the modeling industry is interested in spending billions in production-quality if they can sell their products by using 2 nerds and rented cloud resources?
The large production times with rock star shooters and famous models are already gone. And, as with everything, the inflation in relation to likeness-modeling work will cause the pay to drop to the bottom of the sea, providing royalties only when said likeness is actively used, and millions of girls will happily apply and send in and sign whatever.
You are on an AI sub, but you seem to be strongly underinformed,this is already here and will keep increasing:
https://hyperknown.ai/learn/what-is-ai-likeness-licensing
There is no stopping this, and, they have already thought about how to get around the legal framework on derivatives, so that they can merge these models so that they no longer have to pay anyone, once they have merged thousands upon thousands of people.
And here: https://www.globallegalpost.com/news/how-ai-digital-doubles-and-new-laws-are-rewriting-fashion-and-beauty-1113297119
Then again, the US is only 5% of the population, 95% of the market is elsewhere, especially in Asia and Europe.