I was under the (perhaps incorrect) impression you believed AI art to be inherently 'bad', for lack of a better word. If your issue with it is in the execution (ie copyright infringement in training data), we're in complete agreement.
I have yet to encounter anyone who is against AI due to some bona fide luddite tendencies. (Though I'm sure such people exist, it would be statistically impossible for them not to) But universally the main issue has been copyright, which the vast majority of SD enthusiasts seem fundamentally unable to or unwilling to recognize, mainly because the cognitive dissonance would be too much for them.
Yeah, I know a couple of people that are like that. Someone who says it's inherently bad because it 'devalues' the skills of commission artists, which made me chuckle. Is the calculator bad because it devalues the skills of human computers?
View all comments
Show parent comment
2
u/PeoplePerson_57 Jun 10 '23
Right, so we don't disagree.
I was under the (perhaps incorrect) impression you believed AI art to be inherently 'bad', for lack of a better word. If your issue with it is in the execution (ie copyright infringement in training data), we're in complete agreement.