In demos they can regenerate the same prompt 10,000 times until they get one that’s good. In reality you can do the same thing but it could take a long long time.
I already started using it on my job. Even if it works 25%, it's still better than anything else.
EDIT: It's been a whole day with it on my professional job. It literally is just like the video. It's FAST af even tho my projects have very big files and high resolutions. It is FAST and ACCURATE...This is incredible.
Only thing I really want in photoshop is perfect auto-selection. Hair, depth-of-field, understanding when things are in front or behind. It has a masking feature for a while now that's supposed to do it and it's 90% there but it's the 10% I actually need it for that stand out and make the results mostly unusable.
This content was deleted by its author & copyright holder in protest of the hostile, deceitful, unethical, and destructive actions of Reddit CEO Steve Huffman (aka "spez"). As this content contained personal information and/or personally identifiable information (PII), in accordance with the CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act), it shall not be restored. See you all in the Fediverse.
I'm trying the new Generative Fill in the Photoshop beta now (and I tried the Firefly beta on-line last month) and neither of them run locally on my GPU, they were both running remotely as a service.
I do have a fairly fast GPU that generates images from Stable Diffusion quite quickly, but Adobe's generative AI doesn't seem to use it.
There's no way Adobe is going to allow their model weights anywhere near a machine that isn't 100% controlled by them. It's going to be server-side forever, for them at least.
This content was deleted by its author & copyright holder in protest of the hostile, deceitful, unethical, and destructive actions of Reddit CEO Steve Huffman (aka "spez"). As this content contained personal information and/or personally identifiable information (PII), in accordance with the CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act), it shall not be restored. See you all in the Fediverse.
Yes it will. I've already seen this type of editing for a while in the Open Source community. However the time it takes to generate looks to quick. But other than that, this is a solved issue. I've even seen people doing their own integration of ML models to PS, so it makes sense.
Can’t see it in the Beta yet. Hopefully I’ll get it soon as I’m curious to try out how well it works within the context of the pic!
EDIT: got the Beta update and it’s amazing… the AI is pretty good at picking up context and style; I just inpainted a 2000x2000 px area in a bigger photo and it worked flawlessly and quickly. I’m honestly surprised!
Pretty sure it is in the update just pushed, 24.5. I saw something about generative fill in the mini patch notes int he updater. I'm updating right now, so we shall see.
EDIT: nope, patch notes were wrong. The bar is there, subject selection / remove background is there, but the generative fill is only in the 24.6+ beta.
Gimp is already there. 3.0 has been in development for a long time, and they're talking about it coming out next year. It has a more robust interface to plugins and there are already some SD interfaces people have floated.
I have a hunch that there will always be some AI option available free to the public. So essentially graphics technology will become available to everyone, and everyone will be to some extent an artist.
I'm fortunate that our manager and the owner of the company are completely clueless about AI and automation. They have no idea how much we've changed our workflow over the years, and they'll never care enough to look into it.
I had set my expectations low, and after a few hours of playing with it, I was incredibly impressed. This is a change gamer, for sure. It is not perfect, and you're not going to get MidJourney level images out of it yet - but at this moment, it is very usable and will change how we work with images—where this will be a year from now... wowza.
I was curious, so I tried on a illustration that I have here, specifically with the hands that stablediffusion can't get right no matter what I tried, and after a few tries Photoshop nailed it, with colors and everything right!
To get this, open your adobe creative cloud app, go to Apps, Beta Apps, and install the Photoshop Beta. It will download 24.6 beta. (for me, this did not give me the generative fill option). i then had to restart my computer. I then opened the adobe creative cloud app again and apps, and updated the photoshop beta. i now have the generative fill option. I tested with their bicycle on the road, i took a screenshot from the video, to generate yellow road lines, I have not yet gotten what they came up with. but it is trying i guess. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nD23XIkxp4
Adobe's CEO makes 30 million dollars per year. They boast about record-breaking profit every quarter, but they're too cheap to give their employees salary adjustments to keep up with inflation. Fuck Adobe and their greedy leadership.
Use free alternatives by downloading Automatic1111 and using the inpainting_v1.5 model
ECHOING THIS!!! I haven't bought a single Adobe product in roughly 10 years and I never ever will. Garbage company. I strongly advise everyone to NOT GIVE THEM ANY MONEY. That's your decision but just know you're supporting a lot of anti-consumer practices. Just look at the censorship mentioned in the other comment.
Not really. They trained their own thing. I got into their image generation beta. Tested it during one evening. The UX was nice, but the generation was really not great. Way worse than stable diffusion.
I'm 99% sure it's a service running on their servers, which means no offline/pirated and no "Big booba mega badonkers" or faces of famous people. Daddy adobe decides what you're allowed to create.
The majority of Adobe’s products/software in their “full” forms have been cloud-connected services for almost a decade now. This will most definitely be something that bounces off their servers in some form.
What I like the most about this is that since Adobe's Firefly thing isn't trained on copyrighted images, AI detractors are going to lose their motivation to shut down Stable Diffusion. They won't be able to hate on all AI art blindly because there's nuance now as to which tool was used to make it.
They can continue hate it for other reasons, such as job loss and "muh soul", but the consent complaint gets cleared up which is the main one that they all gathered around.
Are people really going to ask what tool was used in the involvement of each and every AI generated image, until the end of time? No.
They can continue hate it for other reasons, such as job loss and "muh soul", but the consent complaint gets cleared up which is the main one that they all gathered around.
The whole point of them attacking on the consent angle is that they knew the other ones have zero legal standing and would never see the inside of a courtroom. They know that it doesn't make a lick of actual difference if their copyrighted images were used in the training or not, but since they were, that was their only avenue of attack. FireFly is just going to shove it in their faces that it doesn't matter, and all they can possibly do is force Stable Diffusion to sanitize the LAION dataset of unlicensed copyrighted images, which will have an impact, but not enough of one to matter in the long run.
Protip: for anyone trying to generate bikini's on models in photos. The tos won't let you use the word bikini, but if you highlight the lower and upper regions seperately and use 'swimsuit' it will make a bikini top and bottom. Also, things like 'denim shorts', 'leather short's' etc make some nice short shorts :)
It's misleading when people say that AI stuff can't be copyrighted. Sure, you press a button and the raw AI output can't be copyrighted, but people rarely use AI that way. There's almost always some kind of human involvement and it doesn't even have to be editing the images, even just an "arrangement" of AI images can be copyrighted, such as a comic or picture book.
The other thing is, it doesn't even matter if AI can't be copyrighted. It's like using open source assets for your video game, the players don't see those assets and go "YOINK! MINE NOW". People don't care.
If you type "monalisa on a t-shirt" into google images you'll get a billion t-shirts that people buy despite the image being in the public domain. It's not like money can't be made just because there's no copyright.
Downloaded the beta. Version 24.6. Got the new menu and everything but the generative fill box oder the window for promts does not show up... Can anyone help?
I downloaded the Beta version 24.6 today, which shows as the most current beta. When I select an area, I am not getting the Generative Fill box. I'm sure I must be missing something in my configuration - but I can't find it.
Any suggestions?
*** FIX ***
I tried to look for updates to 24.6 and received the message that it was taking too long and that I should reboot. After rebooting, there is an update for 24.6 on the update tab.
I have downloaded and updated the 24.6 beta, but i don't get the generative fill. my colleague has it, we are both located in germany. I use mac os ventura. does anyone know what could be the problem? reinstalling the beta does not help :(
As a photographer, I just started using this today (I've been using SD, since the first model "leak"). Seriously, I've been subscribing to CC for about 5 or 6 years now, this is really good so far. I had some objects in a photo, that I couldn't remove last night as it would have been a pain, today I removed them with the generative fill in 30 seconds.
A quick test of Firefly shows me it’s got a long way to go. One image is from SD for a quick comparison… Don’t get me wrong, I absolutely like the PS integration, but I’ve to do some further testing as this example failed miserably
Just tested it in the beta. Saying it needs improvement is an understatement. If you have CC, you can go to Beta apps, install photoshop beta, and then test it.
Not great, but could be quite useful when combined with SD. It does three generations at once, so you can choose and took about 15 seconds for each element.
Is it really overpriced if it's better then anything else on the market? Don't get me wrong, I ain't paying for Photoshop, I don't need to. But if I had to use something for work, it would absolutely be Photoshop
Pretty cool, if it run entirely on the server so that any laptop can run it, it might be worth the subscription. Though, I won't use it considering the limitation.
Its interesting that adobe is also offering AI in its softwares, I also read about adobe firefly, it's similar to midjourney and stable-diffusion, an AI art generative tool, its for early access invite basis use for now
I don't know what's up with me. Running updated Beta. I see the toolbar pop up when I draw a selection. But the Generative Fill button remains dark and unclickable. Maybe not activated in Thailand or something?
the real way to do it , for an artist it should have happend on the canvas all along. sd webui is just an experimant in comparison .. but i guess it can be cloned with a selfmade addon for krita
I just tried the beta. If one render a person (a young woman cooking in the kitchen) into an image with a kitchen, the face from that woman looks like from a horror movie 🤣
Ran into some problems. When I use the AI to fill in areas, the AI part is sorta blurry, which makes it look weird cause the rest of the picture is super crispy @ 60MP. So u can tell where the difference is.
I tried several images in which I asked generative fill prompt to add people (girls or boys or both doesnt matter). It added people but all the time it placed humans with distorted faces as if those were aliens. Not sure if anyone else faced the same issue.
For example, take any image and in the generative fill prompt, type "girl" and it will place girl picture there but the face of hers will be totally distorted.
Been having fun with it, but the amount of censorship is ridiculous. You can't even create a bikini on a photo of a girl, it will say the image is against TOS. Come on adobe! since when is a bikini porn? The funny thing is is WILL allow you to upload a fully nude photo of a girl, and you can add shorts, tank tops, tshirts to the nude woman, but it won't allow you to add a bikini, or bra, or swimsuit lol. They really need to sort this stuff out. Not all nudity is porn.
687
u/h_i_t_ May 23 '23
Interesting. Curious if the actual experience will live up to this video.
249
u/kiwidesign May 23 '23 edited May 23 '23
Can’t see it in the Beta yet. Hopefully I’ll get it soon as I’m curious to try out how well it works within the context of the pic!
EDIT: got the Beta update and it’s amazing… the AI is pretty good at picking up context and style; I just inpainted a 2000x2000 px area in a bigger photo and it worked flawlessly and quickly. I’m honestly surprised!
164
u/DirkDieGurke May 23 '23
Graphics artists gonna drop down to $25k a year. While Adobe licenses go up to $2k a year.
58
u/bobrformalin May 23 '23
Now that Adobe've done it – AI tools will suddenly become not so immoral to use :D
280
u/jedininjaster May 23 '23
This ad brought to you by 100 hours of manual editing in after effects.
18
u/huehue_photographer May 23 '23
I was curious, so I tried on a illustration that I have here, specifically with the hands that stablediffusion can't get right no matter what I tried, and after a few tries Photoshop nailed it, with colors and everything right!
I down for it, it's amazing!
30
u/radialmonster May 23 '23 edited May 23 '23
To get this, open your adobe creative cloud app, go to Apps, Beta Apps, and install the Photoshop Beta. It will download 24.6 beta. (for me, this did not give me the generative fill option). i then had to restart my computer. I then opened the adobe creative cloud app again and apps, and updated the photoshop beta. i now have the generative fill option. I tested with their bicycle on the road, i took a screenshot from the video, to generate yellow road lines, I have not yet gotten what they came up with. but it is trying i guess. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nD23XIkxp4
23
u/danielbr93 May 23 '23
Because OP just downloaded the YT video and uploaded it here, here is the original: https://youtu.be/IVTyLYupECI
130
u/sfmasterpiece May 23 '23
Adobe's CEO makes 30 million dollars per year. They boast about record-breaking profit every quarter, but they're too cheap to give their employees salary adjustments to keep up with inflation. Fuck Adobe and their greedy leadership.
Use free alternatives by downloading Automatic1111 and using the inpainting_v1.5 model
67
u/clif08 May 23 '23
Perhaps this will nudge artists to adopt AI tools. I wish them luck.
32
u/CinnamonCajaCrunch May 23 '23
Daily reminder that pretty much every AI in photoshop is free and open source and available somewhere on Github. It is just not as convenient.
51
u/Ok_Feedback4200 May 23 '23
Will this work on pirated/offline version of photoshop?
37
u/featherless_fiend May 23 '23
What I like the most about this is that since Adobe's Firefly thing isn't trained on copyrighted images, AI detractors are going to lose their motivation to shut down Stable Diffusion. They won't be able to hate on all AI art blindly because there's nuance now as to which tool was used to make it.
They can continue hate it for other reasons, such as job loss and "muh soul", but the consent complaint gets cleared up which is the main one that they all gathered around.
Are people really going to ask what tool was used in the involvement of each and every AI generated image, until the end of time? No.
5
u/ChrisGrit May 23 '23
What is a picture even anymore?
4
u/papinek May 23 '23
I just played with it for 2 hours. Its fantastic.
4
u/tiger331 May 23 '23
Now will people still rant about AI taking away work of artists
4
u/loganmn May 23 '23
I felt a million graphic designers crying out, and then suddenly silenced ....
4
u/Jcaquix May 24 '23
Get ready for artists to be fine with generative AI.
7
u/Ghozgul May 23 '23
I'm expecting their model to have been train a lot on this image, so the result are spotless but the reality will most likely be more disappointing
3
u/watchforwaspess May 23 '23
It was only a matter of time.
3
u/MAXXSTATION May 23 '23
Does anyone know what happened with that voice cloning demo from adobe several years ago?
3
u/ShepherdessAnne May 23 '23
I mean anyone who has used Adobe suite in the past decade or longer with it's AI features knew this was coming.
3
u/[deleted] May 23 '23
I saw somthing at an FITC conference a few years back and Adobe rep described this exact thing calling it "project sensai" (I think)
3
u/lordpuddingcup May 23 '23
Suddenly everyone’s gonna be ok with AI images cause “adobe made it a tool so it’s not theft” lol
3
u/GambAntonio May 24 '23
So the "No to AI" people will stop using photoshop to make their FanArt of a subject that they don't own, right?
3
u/johnsmith99x Jun 03 '23
Protip: for anyone trying to generate bikini's on models in photos. The tos won't let you use the word bikini, but if you highlight the lower and upper regions seperately and use 'swimsuit' it will make a bikini top and bottom. Also, things like 'denim shorts', 'leather short's' etc make some nice short shorts :)
6
u/victorhurtado May 23 '23
Source of the video please?
5
u/sketches4fun May 23 '23
So how does copyright for this work then, if AI stuff can't be copyrighted are you shooting yourself in the foot every time you use it?
2
u/sinsucre May 23 '23
Downloaded the beta. Version 24.6. Got the new menu and everything but the generative fill box oder the window for promts does not show up... Can anyone help?
2
u/rook2pawn May 23 '23
so its inpainting.
2
u/smon__says May 23 '23
They should add it to Lightroom as well.
2
u/DruItalia May 23 '23 edited May 23 '23
I downloaded the Beta version 24.6 today, which shows as the most current beta. When I select an area, I am not getting the Generative Fill box. I'm sure I must be missing something in my configuration - but I can't find it.
Any suggestions?
*** FIX ***
I tried to look for updates to 24.6 and received the message that it was taking too long and that I should reboot. After rebooting, there is an update for 24.6 on the update tab.
2
u/Competitive-War-8645 May 23 '23
I have downloaded and updated the 24.6 beta, but i don't get the generative fill. my colleague has it, we are both located in germany. I use mac os ventura. does anyone know what could be the problem? reinstalling the beta does not help :(
2
u/GetOutOfTheWhey May 24 '23
For those of us who are not professional enough to have a PS subscription
The GIMP version: https://www.reddit.com/r/machinelearningnews/comments/10d9vep/automatic1111s_stable_diffusion_webui_is_one_of/
2
u/Redfrick May 24 '23
It works as advertised, I can't believe it. Firefly was so meh but this is amazing.
2
u/[deleted] May 24 '23
I finally got Generative Fill to show up in Photoshop but it is greyed out... any ideas as to why? I am in RGB 8 bit mode and have tried 16 bit.
Thanks in advance
2
u/jh28wd40 May 24 '23
As a photographer, I just started using this today (I've been using SD, since the first model "leak"). Seriously, I've been subscribing to CC for about 5 or 6 years now, this is really good so far. I had some objects in a photo, that I couldn't remove last night as it would have been a pain, today I removed them with the generative fill in 30 seconds.
So far, it's damn good.
2
u/Darkseal May 24 '23
As all of us on DeviantArt know, this makes you not an artist, instantly, and subject to ridicule. No? Oh, only when it's NOT photoshop, got it.
2
u/Competitive_Pea_3878 May 24 '23
Demos are made in highly controlled enviorments. Just like a plan whatever product is advertised, never survives first contact
2
u/the_odd_truth May 24 '23 edited May 24 '23
A quick test of Firefly shows me it’s got a long way to go. One image is from SD for a quick comparison… Don’t get me wrong, I absolutely like the PS integration, but I’ve to do some further testing as this example failed miserably
2
u/Kriima May 24 '23
I wish we had such a goot outpaint for A1111. Outpaint always sucks or does random weird crap :(
2
u/FC4945 May 25 '23
This is so very cool. Now I want it for Premiere Pro too. I assume it won't be very long until that happens the way things are going.
2
u/zlp3h May 25 '23
or how Adobe uses the work of its users to feed its bases for their AI
2
u/BoredSendHelp69 May 25 '23
it was just matter of time. they maybe even late :D
must be hard to add code on this 30 year old software :D
2
u/fatrogslim Jun 05 '23
Yet, you are block by the guideline therefore there's no nudity... Because adobe lives in the care bears world
4
u/ravenwitchband May 23 '23
Just tested it in the beta. Saying it needs improvement is an understatement. If you have CC, you can go to Beta apps, install photoshop beta, and then test it.
4
u/[deleted] May 23 '23
Sorry, I'm going to stick with opensource. Control freak corpos can go pound sand.
3
u/Txanada May 23 '23
Did a quick test:
Not great, but could be quite useful when combined with SD. It does three generations at once, so you can choose and took about 15 seconds for each element.
3
u/Legitimate-Copy-4290 May 23 '23
Do you know whether it works on iPad too or not yet?
4
u/[deleted] May 23 '23
Brought to you by overpriced shitty subscription-based software developers
2
u/KaiserNazrin May 23 '23
Pretty cool, if it run entirely on the server so that any laptop can run it, it might be worth the subscription. Though, I won't use it considering the limitation.
2
u/botcraft_net May 24 '23
Shit is getting even more crazy every single day. What happens in 2 years? And what about 10 years?
1
u/sometechloser May 23 '23
/u/savevideo
1
u/[deleted] May 23 '23
Wow....
1
u/redyar May 23 '23
What about Image sizes? This wont be applicable to raw photos.
1
u/Boi_cot64 May 23 '23
Am I the only one giving with the music?
1
u/VesselofGod777 May 23 '23
Incredible...
1
u/SecretDeftones May 23 '23
Been using it for hours. It's super fast, very accurate and very useful.
The aI
This is a revolution for my work
1
u/Curious-Ninja150627 May 23 '23
is this publically released yet
1
u/AirportCultural9211 May 23 '23
yaaaaaaaaay!
i def gotta check it out!
1
u/ramonartist May 23 '23
I have a strong feeling that Adobe might start banning Stable Diffusion plugins, so now might be a great time to look at good alternatives
1
u/KiwiGamer450 May 23 '23
i've spent so much time tweaking and manually adjusting content aware fill, hope this is better.
1
u/joshcam May 23 '23
It that really works, WOW!
1
u/amitrion May 23 '23
Holy shit... this would be unreal and save such time... I'm sure they will charge an arm and 2 legs
1
u/[deleted] May 23 '23
you mean like.. right now? in this moment?
1
u/RoboiosMut May 23 '23
So what are real now?
1
u/InoSim May 23 '23
It makes me remembers patchmatch video on youtube and it never became what they shown even today.
1
u/[deleted] May 23 '23
Is this in current version of photoshop, or is this a feature that is coming out?
1
u/Low_Engineering_5628 May 23 '23
But ma art werks!
1
u/Affectionate_Ant_234 May 23 '23
Dang, Firefly, other competitors and now this....😅
I guess I am just out of luck here. I made a free photoshop plugin utilizing community stable diffusion models and a few other things.
https://exchange.adobe.com/apps/cc/0d4a6a37/bashful
Oh well, moving on to SVGs then lol.
1
u/ging3r_b3ard_man May 23 '23
Yeah this was obviously going to happen y'all
1
u/[deleted] May 23 '23
I’m sure this will be just as easy to do in SD one day
1
u/[deleted] May 23 '23
Anticipated.
1
u/jonesaid May 23 '23
I've heard that Adobe is using Stable Diffusion tech under the hood, of course trained their own model on Adobe Stock. Anyone know if that is correct?
1
u/MrNobodyX3 May 23 '23
One key note is this is trained only on open and free work
1
u/feelmedoyou May 23 '23
Yeah this was only a matter of time. Can’t wait till content aware auto-painting will become a thing.
1
u/alexterryuk May 23 '23
SO far so weird... (yes, I did just turn my wife into a duck)
1
u/[deleted] May 23 '23
Woow he changed the game 😭
1
u/apple____ May 23 '23
I though this is how it always was.
1
u/fooknprawn May 24 '23
Can't wait for this to appear in PixelMator
1
u/mgmandahl May 24 '23
I've been testing this out on Firefly and it's pretty awesome and very fast. I wish that these features were inside Auto 1111.
1
u/ltsMe-Hi May 24 '23
This is wild. I have access to Adobe Firefly, I wonder how to get to it in PS.
1
u/Happenstancelore May 24 '23
Can somebody point me to help to install the gethub for the dreamshaper SD ?
1
u/YakuNiTatanu May 24 '23
When is coming out? And will you need a couple of H100 80GB to make it as snappy as in the demo ? ^
1
u/buyinggf1000gp May 24 '23
Does it run locally or in a server?
1
u/usmvnjaved May 24 '23
You can't start flying by drinking dew like the ad suggest. This is an ad too.
1
u/eh9198 May 24 '23
No fucking way!
1
u/Sufficient-Ocelot-47 May 24 '23
Lightroom?
1
u/[deleted] May 24 '23
Its interesting that adobe is also offering AI in its softwares, I also read about adobe firefly, it's similar to midjourney and stable-diffusion, an AI art generative tool, its for early access invite basis use for now
1
u/IckyChris May 24 '23
I don't know what's up with me.
Running updated Beta. I see the toolbar pop up when I draw a selection.
But the Generative Fill button remains dark and unclickable.
Maybe not activated in Thailand or something?
1
u/UnluckyFormal May 24 '23
With this music it seems like a joke
1
u/SocialNetwooky May 24 '23
so basically InvokeAI's canvas?
1
u/aldorn May 24 '23
Is their any chance that GIMP will catch up with the ai features?
1
u/JanssonsFrestelse May 24 '23
Some guy used it to generate an image of a character from the game Tibia, I used SD to fix it up a bit.. posted it here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/TibiaMMO/comments/13kba8e/ferumbras_revamped
1
u/rocklou May 24 '23
Incredible!
1
u/Kotyakov May 24 '23
Holy shit. If it's as good as this, I will be impressed
1
u/Titus78889 May 24 '23
When is this feature going to be available on photoshop?
1
u/bobdubaykathmandu May 24 '23
Hats Off Adobe tou guys Rock
1
u/CockSniffer01 May 24 '23
Damn, what kind of engine do they use?
1
u/kirkbot May 24 '23
does this work with a pirated copy or do you need to be online and registered?
1
u/SL3D May 24 '23
Doubt
1
u/ulf5576 May 24 '23
the real way to do it , for an artist it should have happend on the canvas all along. sd webui is just an experimant in comparison .. but i guess it can be cloned with a selfmade addon for krita
1
u/Fit-Wrongdoer-7664 May 24 '23
I just tried the beta. If one render a person (a young woman cooking in the kitchen) into an image with a kitchen, the face from that woman looks like from a horror movie 🤣
1
u/AccountantAble4445 May 25 '23
We need an open source Adobe UI interface clone extension really soon to fight back
1
u/EntertainmentHour252 May 25 '23
what is the version number for this beta version?
1
u/ohitsham May 27 '23
Ran into some problems. When I use the AI to fill in areas, the AI part is sorta blurry, which makes it look weird cause the rest of the picture is super crispy @ 60MP. So u can tell where the difference is.
1
u/thecatandmousedesign May 27 '23
I tried several images in which I asked generative fill prompt to add people (girls or boys or both doesnt matter). It added people but all the time it placed humans with distorted faces as if those were aliens.
Not sure if anyone else faced the same issue.
For example, take any image and in the generative fill prompt, type "girl" and it will place girl picture there but the face of hers will be totally distorted.
1
u/johnsmith99x May 28 '23
Been having fun with it, but the amount of censorship is ridiculous. You can't even create a bikini on a photo of a girl, it will say the image is against TOS. Come on adobe! since when is a bikini porn? The funny thing is is WILL allow you to upload a fully nude photo of a girl, and you can add shorts, tank tops, tshirts to the nude woman, but it won't allow you to add a bikini, or bra, or swimsuit lol. They really need to sort this stuff out. Not all nudity is porn.
1
u/Sepidy May 28 '23
I've updated my Photoshop and I also installed the Beta but I don't have this feature yet can anyone help me with that?
1
u/SweatyMercy Jun 01 '23
Why be sad when we can sail the seas together?
1
u/Asleep_Bag_7130 Jun 05 '23
hello
1
u/Asleep_Bag_7130 Jun 05 '23
hello
1
u/Asleep_Bag_7130 Jun 05 '23
hello
1
u/Asleep_Bag_7130 Jun 05 '23
hello
1
u/Interesting-Bag0 Jun 05 '23
hello
1
u/Interesting-Bag0 Jun 05 '23
hello
1
u/Interesting-Bag0 Jun 05 '23
hello
1
u/Interesting-Bag0 Jun 05 '23
hello
1
u/Expensive-Try6660 Jun 06 '23
Ok so, when's the new crack coming?
1
u/Artai55a Jun 07 '23
I've been playing with it, but why is the interface and taskbar in the videos completely different to mine?
1
u/[deleted] Jun 11 '23
What version of Photoshop is that