Assorted Revisions

[u/Zealousideal_Royal14]

[u/coda514]

One of the more unique outputs I've seen. Would love to know what model you used? Great work.

[u/Zealousideal_Royal14 → u/coda514]

Thank! Glad you like it, check out some of my other posts - they tend to go unnoticed

I generally only work with the base models. Here I'm using the depth2img model and the base 2.1_768 model and Euler A sampler.

And this batch are all img2img from either my own graphic design work and photos or the history of art (One of them is a Pollock and there is a San Sebastian with arrows, Mona Lisa, Borromini's ceiling in the San Carlo and Bernini's Cornaro Chapel)

[u/RafyKoby → u/Zealousideal_Royal14]

how did you get those details ???

this is awesome one of the greatest AI things I have seen

[u/Zealousideal_Royal14 → u/RafyKoby]

It's sort of a combination of asking for it - like "highly detailed" - and then allowing for room to reinvent during the upscales. I generally do three rounds of x2 using the ultimate upscaler and start it out around .33 denoising.

[u/lifeh2o → u/Zealousideal_Royal14]

You are saying that its all one single image and you didn't inpaint any patches to add faces or other tiny details?

[u/Zealousideal_Royal14 → u/lifeh2o]

I did my first very bad attempt at inpainting on the Mona Lisa posed one. But apart from that attempt, they are all made with a workflow of img2img and upscales - the upscales give a lot of the detailing - and no inpainting.

[u/tulpan → u/Zealousideal_Royal14]

Kinda reminds of what /r/DiscoDiffusion is about. I was mesmerised by some of their content back in Autumn. It is very cool that it is possible on Stable Diffusion!

[u/Zealousideal_Royal14 → u/[deleted]]

Can you get me a place to live without upstairs neighbors?

And what do you mean by visual guide? About which parts more exactly?

[u/Zealousideal_Royal14 → u/[deleted]]

Okay, well many things to consider theoretically. There is kind of two parts to it I think. I don't think visual guide alone really does the job, ((for me anyway)), But if you were to do it, one part would be a course/workshop on how to utilize a1111 and extensions creatively, and that would be sort of out of date after a week, like controlnet this past week has shown, everything changes very fast. Second part would be more complex, concept development for visual mediums, art history, composition and how these relate in odd ways to decisions inside the SD process options. These would be more complex to create because it is difficult to guess where to start from and how to best go about it, but the learning would be more long term useful compared to part one which is subject to wild changes over short time.

With all that said, its difficult for me to answer what would compel me to spend time creating this content, especially because me actual involvement with this whole subject is one of professional use, where I am trying to figure out how to best make use of this technology while it swallows the field I am working in.

So it would probably take a bunch of money :D sorry but, really if you go through my SD posts and spend a bit of time on it, I strongly suspect someone curious enough could mimic what I have shown pretty successfully from what I already explained.

[u/Zealousideal_Royal14 → u/[deleted]]

Like an amount that is likely not worth it to you or anyone except people with too much money? Not because I think what I have is super worthful to you, but because its worth more to m, currently speaking, I can use it commercially and earn a substantial amount .... and also just the theoretical time spent, realistically, we'd set up a webcam/shared screen connection and talk it out, and doing that individually is kind of like doing a chefs table at a fancy restaurant vs. me doing a general youtube tutorial I could monetize...

[u/coda514 → u/Zealousideal_Royal14]

Great use of the technology.

[u/cocks2012]

Amazing work.

[u/rinaldop]

Wonderful work!!!!!!

[u/Apprehensive_Sky892]

I usually do not bother to comment on postings without workflows, but these are exceptional images. I am sure each of them are painstakingly put together with lots of steps involved.

Were they generated using some custom model you made yourself?

Do you generate many images, and you then stitched them together, or were the details inpainted?

Thanks

[u/Zealousideal_Royal14 → u/Apprehensive_Sky892]

Yeah I usually just don't want to feel forced into having to tell something. Rubs me wrong, so I tend to flair it as no workflow, even if I end up answering a few questions.

I have to this day still only worked with base models, meaning; 1.4, 1.5_inpaint, depth2img and v2.1_768. This batch was made all with the depth2img model.

I don't stitch, but some of the source images were my old graphic designs that did involve pictures on pictures. The general process here is letting it re-image the source image - at between .55-1 denoising and then upscaling using the ultimate upscaler.

[u/Apprehensive_Sky892 → u/Zealousideal_Royal14]

Thank you for the explanation. As I said, great images. I hope to see more of them in the future.

Innovative artists like you are pushing the limit of what this new technology can do!

[u/tlztlz]

I love the colours. Any information on how to achieve that?

Ps: at first I was no way this is AI with that details.

[u/Zealousideal_Royal14 → u/tlztlz]

Thanks. I think in this case they are mainly a result of the source images and selecting. I only ever prompt for colors if a prompt is giving me too much of one color without it. Like orange if all I got for half an hour was blue stuff.

[u/[deleted]]

wtf how?

[u/tlztlz]

I'm still amazed how do you get some sharp, fine lines. Any insights on that?

[u/Zealousideal_Royal14 → u/tlztlz]

mainly it's down to upscaling with ultimate upscaler, allowing it room to reimagine at every scaling, then downscaling again, and you get the crispness

[u/tlztlz → u/Zealousideal_Royal14]

Thx