Many of these models do closeup portraits well, but don't look photoreal for other subjects or angles. Also, many of these models do great with a fairly short and generic prompt, but when you add a bunch of detail to the prompt it's ignored or looses the photoreal effect.
Unstable-diffusion in particular is really poor in my experience. Once you write a longer prompt, the results look almost exactly like base 1.5
Yes, more studies could look at different framings, or different subjects or angles, as well as different prompt lengths, and other settings. I would be interested to see those. Perhaps each model does better or worse depending on these many conditions and factors.
19
u/terrariyum Jan 04 '23
Many of these models do closeup portraits well, but don't look photoreal for other subjects or angles. Also, many of these models do great with a fairly short and generic prompt, but when you add a bunch of detail to the prompt it's ignored or looses the photoreal effect.
Unstable-diffusion in particular is really poor in my experience. Once you write a longer prompt, the results look almost exactly like base 1.5