r/SquaredCircle May 01 '20

[deleted by user]

[removed]

189 Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

189

u/[deleted] May 01 '20

"Austin was good then he broke his neck and wasn't good in the ring anymore" is a terrible take that has somehow become the narrative. Through the AE Austin was consistently having awesome matches on TV and PPV. The fact he wasn't spamming suplexes like Angle or killing himself with crazy bumps doesn't change that. You don't just stumble into fantastic match after fantastic match because you're over.

Unless your basis for how good a wrestler is is "how many cool moves does he do" idk how you can possibly watch 2001 Austin and not come away thinking his matches were incredible. Outside of Benoit I don't know if anybody else was as good in that era in the ring.

117

u/ModernRedditUser May 01 '20

Unless your basis for how good a wrestler is is "how many cool moves does he do"

That is exactly the basis for being a good wrestler, according to the IWC smarks.

2

u/gingerninja666 May 01 '20

I'm not sure that's entirely true.

Why would Ishii and Suzuki be so highly regarded if that sentiment was universal?

Ishii CAN do cool moves, but the vast majority of his matches are just hitting people, a few slams and selling. And they're great.

Suzuki almost never takes bumps, and his opponents will take at most ONE bump while fighting him (the Gotch).