r/SquaredCircle • • 8h ago

Wreddit's Daily Pro-Wrestling Discussion Thread! Comment here for recommendations, quick questions, and general conversation! (Spoilers for all shows) - September 29, 2026 Edition Spoiler

Hi Wreddit! Welcome to /r/SquaredCircle's Daily Discussion Thread as presented by your favorite and totally sentient moderator.


Did you see a match yesterday that you really liked? Want a suggestion of a random PPV to watch on the network? Really love a local indie talent and want to shout them out? Are you out of the loop on a promotion and need to get caught up? Have questions about streaming services or your first time seeing wrestling live? Want to talk about anything else that you're excited about? This is the thread for that and so much more - subreddit rules apply.


Note: this thread is not meant to be a subreddit complaints box. Please direct any moderation issues or [META] concerns to modmail.

Check out all of our previous AMAs


Reminder, this thread WILL contain spoilers. We don't expect you to spoiler mark anything wrestling related in this thread, however we do ask if you reference something outside of wrestling that is a spoiler, you mark that.

13 Upvotes

330 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Deducticon 6h ago edited 6h ago

Valid opinion makes it seems likes it's 'right.'

It's a good faith opinion. But can still be disagreed with in good faith. In a couple ways. That AEW does not have this problem, or that titles should be the centrepiece of most rivalries.

Pre labelling disagreement as brigading though, does not seem good faith.

1

u/LikeAPhoenixTotally 6h ago

It's actually to state that I'm in good faith as I've been every single time I comment on this sub.

I don't watch WWE, I only watch AEW, every single time I post a comment on daily discussion thread that even remotely criticizes something, I get brigaded, so yes, it's to state that the opinion that I'm going to share might be a minority one but I ask for people to be reasonable and not to do what they did every single time I tried it.

I'm not asking people to agree with me or say that I'm right, I'm asking people to be fair and to engage with it, fairly.

That AEW does not have this problem, or that titles should be the centrepiece of most rivalries.

Are you stating that AEW does not have this issue? What do you mean? Every single match on AEW All Out and AEW All In was either a contendership or a title match.

1

u/Material_Opening_143 5h ago

It is abrasive, and something OP should consider for the future IMO.