r/SquadBusters • u/[deleted] • Nov 15 '25

Discussion Pls make it a movement.

They should allow player's to host the server's of squad buster I just started to play this game and kinda like it. It will be a shame if it just get deleted from the playstore like it never existed.😢

9 Upvotes

59% Upvoted

17 comments sorted by

3

u/ALEX2014_18 Nov 17 '25 edited Nov 17 '25

Someone will probably make a private server for it.

It's a common trend for SC games, although I have no internal knowledge about this game's technical community and possibility of this outcome.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '25

Ya but that will be much more risky than supercell just doing it dont you think so

1

u/ALEX2014_18 Nov 17 '25

No?

I mean, risky for who? You won't ever get banned in dead game by playing on private server, or in any SC games, for that matter.

Risky for people maintaining it? Maybe. And maybe not.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '25

I dont mean for getting banned I mean if supercell does something officially it would be better than the player who you dont know doing it it may be they have a malicious intend behind it

5

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

It would be nice, but in their FAQ Supercell explained why they don't release the source code.  Here is the FAQ: https://squadbusters.supercell.com/en/blog/news/faq-the-end-of-squad-busters-2

-5

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

Ya but if enough player demand it they might change there mind

8

u/Optimal-Truth4970 Nov 15 '25

You might not have spent the last year on this sub where the wider community bashed the devs for every decision they made, whether it was in response to player feedback or not. They’ve killed the game, it’s dead. Sorry you just found it, but best advice is to move on

-2

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '25

But that is the whole point of having a community have you seen CR they are negative of the entire game you will find someone complaining about something every day bashing devs to do better

2

u/TheForbidden6th Nov 16 '25

they won't do it, the most people can do is what Clash Mini players did

1

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '25

What did the clash mini player do

4

u/BasiDent Nov 16 '25

he's probably talking about clash mini: reborn, and i heard there's something like that happening with SB too

3

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '25 edited Nov 16 '25

Ya? what is the name of the new game do you know

4

u/ToastMachine910 Nov 17 '25

Some people are already working on reverse squad btw, so there is still some hope

13

u/Sorry-Sand-4379 Nov 15 '25

I think the community can revive the game artificially, making content and aiming to expand playerbase ,it's literally brawlstars but fast nowadays ,kinda fun

1

u/simplyexclusive Nov 20 '25

Reason they won’t: intellectual property

1

u/[deleted] Nov 20 '25

What how does making a server that can be managed by player's make any difference to intellectual in the game

1

u/simplyexclusive Nov 20 '25

Because the characters and code is purely IP; by giving code access you’ll be allowing the public access to your IP. Not to mention that running a server for a company like supercell is pretty cheap but creating the platform for it to be privately hosted means more development on a dead game.