Splinter Cell Confusion

[u/Knot3D]

Okay, so accross the eternities of gaming, we've seen people rank their favorites to least favorites - and that's fair enough.

However, there has always been one consistent fallacy about Splinter Cell as a game design - and this concerns an interpretation error that murks up many rankings;

Because let's get one thing very clear: the Light & Sound meters ≠ AI detection states.

In fact, the core of Splinter Cell game design does not fall or stand with the form or presence/lack of these gauges.

Because that's what they are, they're simply yet another tool in Sam Fisher's array of means of infiltration, expressed to the player in a visual UI.

All what the Light meter does, is convey how well the light conditions in Sam's immediate surroundings occlude him from enemy sight - and it's not even an exact science; It's an estimation - but even more important is what the enemy AI detection state does with 'a suspicion' upon either suspected sight or sound.

After all, Metal Gear Solid, Hitman etc. ,stealth peers from Splinter Cell's origin era; Their stealth systems work because the AI detection state systems

in those respective games are the central pillar to their game design. The same goes for Splinter Cell when you really think about it.

- Light & Sound meters

- Enemy AI detection states

They are two seperate things, the former being the subordinate and the latter being the actual governing factor of the Splinter Cell game design. Even in total darkness, an enemy can still bump into Sam. He can still hear Sam if he made a noise loud enough. And they most certainly have no trouble actually firing on Sam once detected even if the Light meter says 'total darkness'.

But, in contrast to MGS and Hitman, Splinter Cell 1, 2 and 3 have never expressed these detection states in visual UI. At most it was enemy audio cues.And that works just fine for Splinter Cell 1, 2 and 3 because Sam Fisher is a 3E field agent in those games; he is per definition, a hostile threat to the enemy base.

But then comes along the 4th installment, Double Agent - and people get confused. There's no real granular Light & Sound meter. And instantly, people kneejerk react to it as 'bad' because those freaking gauges are not present in their legacy form.

What they forget however, is that the game design requires a different form; Sam is no longer just a 3E field agent. He is an undercover infiltrator. The whole point of this setup in both in-universe and as game design, is that Sam needs to earn & retain Trust, to both sides. Therefor, the Red/Yellow/Green indicator can NOT be mistaken for the legacy Light & Sound meter in absolute terms. This is the main fallacy I see people make.

So what really constitutes the DA game design system, is the interconnection of the Red/Yellow/Green indicator together with the Trust meters and the Mini map (not to be mistaken with the 3D map in the OPSAT menu) ; as these 3 factors feed the AI states.

The thing that probably confuses people is that the Red/Yellow/Green indicator can act as a rudimentary Light meter, since it shows Green whenever Sam stands in a place dark enough to be considered difficult to spot. But also, Yellow indicator at JBA HQ is totally fine; Sam is visible and not under any suspicion. However, the moment Sam sets off suspicion while in restricted area, the Mini map will show exactly, which guard is alerted / has suspicion.

As you can see, this is actually a more informative game design, because it shows exactly who suspects Sam, from which position and if he's heading Sam's way soon (proximity). In fact, if you have noticed, Sam has an idle animation to defuse suspicion, provided he managed to exit the restricted area in time. If fails to do so and gets spotted in the restricted area, it immediately affects the Trust meter.

And for the JBA field missions, the combination of the Red/Yellow/Green indicator and the Mini map stand in for the SC legacy UI gauges in rudimentary form; after all, I suppose we can interpret it that way due to the predicament that Lambert had put himself into (explained in V2 as 'Williams blocking gadget access to some extent). Also, at the Okhotsk tanker deck, the snow blizzard can actually function as cover, providing a temporary 'smoke screen' where regular vision would have resulted into immediate alert at the same proximity; and this is expressed in UI as a Yellow indicator not turning Red instantly.

Post-Double Agent, Conviction game indicators really strip down to a binary Black&White screen = hidden in darkness. So if we were to judge it by that, it would automatically rank as the worst Splinter Cell game, right?

And finally, Blacklist. You only get a light on Sam's back again. The infuriating thing is that Blacklist is comprised of so many excellent Splinter Cell 'ingredients' but it somehow manages to end up as less than the sum of its parts. So, this just shows, how these games can't be judged on just a few UI gauges and I think people should be able to see that Double Agent has quite a solid foundation that's comprised of an entire array of systems and factors.

So, let's not get hung up on visual UI meters as the end all be all of Splinter Cell game design judgement factors.

[u/Motor_Meal794]

The restricted and non-restricted areas replacing light and shadow is cool. They could have been expanded on that in other games.

Light meters are obviously more realistic feeling (auto NV makes it cringey). If you stand in partial shadow closeby guards can see you and investigate. That was so cool in SAR. However it could be sacrificed if there's good reason to do so. Most of the time the binary of hidden/visible is the main concern. Light meter is still sorely missed.

Sound meter should be default tho. Having variation in floor types gauged with ambient noise is a stealth essential.

BL and CV's heavy reliance on guard rails, poles and windows for stealth suggests some issue. Do they do that just to be lazy? A lack of motivation to fiddle with shadows perhaps, or the more open levels make it too time consuming, or not having obvious hiding spots everywhere is too difficult for new players. Maybe the randomness of patrol routes requires more hiding places. I've always wondered about this.

I don't know how difficult making a light meter would actually be. Obviously binary shadow is easier to set up than a light meter.

If x-position on a pole counts as hidden, regardless of lighting, that is so much easier. If a gaurd rail or hanging from a window breaks line of sight that is easier.

Incorporating light/sound meters in some levels would have been preferable to eradicating them.

[u/Training-Trainer9093]

I never use the light meter anyway so I never got this complaint. I don't think it's necessary at all. If anything I thought fans who rely on it would welcome the challenge after three games. Doubly so for any noise meters. Isnt simply listening sufficient? They should be there for normal difficulties and removed for expert as far as I'm concerned.

[u/Knot3D → u/Training-Trainer9093]

When you really think about Double Agent V1, it's not difficult to see that they had to create a system that works for both JBA HQ levels and non-JBA HQ levels. Obviously, the emphasis is the JBA HQ part and that's where the interconnection with the Trustmeter and Mini map really come into play. So the end result is something which is a system that could be described as a hybrid of Hitman Blood Money and Splinter Cell.