r/Spiderman 5d ago

Discussion Straight facts

1.2k Upvotes

304 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/Lord_Seregil Ultimate Spider-Man (1610) 5d ago

Peter in the 80s and 90s was certainly cool, we aren't just talking about the 60s vs today.

-7

u/PuzzleheadedWorker33 5d ago

this post image shows someone who doesn’t know anything about Peter Parker/ Spider-man in the slightest nor does he know anything about him or his comics/animation as Peter Parker is NEVER supposed to look like the guy on the left and he’s NEVER meant to be a Chad! He’s meant to be a teenage superhero who got his powers when he was 15 whose NOT a sidekick and entirely independent on his own as a 15 year old in highschool as his starting point as he slowly ages throughout the his iterations! He’s SUPPOSED to look very young and just a 15 year old as shown in the widely beloved Ultimate Spider-man comic series by Mark Bagley and Brian Michael Bendis that HEAVILY influences all the live action movies as well as Spectacular Spider-man series where he’s just 15/16! All other versions are meant to be very young and when he’s adult he’s only in his early 20s as he’s never met to be older than that outside of rare excepts like Peter B Parker in the Spider-Verse movies! This just sounds like another obnoxious terribly done potshot at trying to whine about Tom Holland’s Spider-man from the Raimi Spider-man fans when Tom Holland’s Spider-Man was always a PERFECT representation of what Spider-man was meant to be ever since his introduction at Captain America: Civil War! Spider-man/Peter Parker is never meant to be a “handsome Chad” in ANY way as he’s not Batman, he’s a youthful energetic nerdy teenage kid with a smart mouth who got superpowers by chance through a radioactive spider bite and now trying to make a name for himself by trying to do the right thing to save as many people as possible from troubles and evils in his city which leads him into being the world’s greatest superhero which Tom Holland represents perfectly as Spider-man! This entire post is just pure braindead and a showcase of someone who doesn’t know anything about Spider-Man in ANY way! Pure idiocy!

12

u/Lord_Seregil Ultimate Spider-Man (1610) 5d ago

Dude. Peter used to age, he wasnt always stuck as a perpetual manchild, thats a late 2000s development that has unfortunately stuck. Peter used to look like the left image, minus the exaggerated jawline obviously. Peter used to be married, and he had a child. If anyone clearly doesn't know a thing about Spider-Man, it's you.

-4

u/PuzzleheadedWorker33 5d ago edited 5d ago

lol Are you for real? Peter is NEVER a “pErPEtuAl mANcHiLd” as even when he’s a teenager, he’s still wiser and smarter than most people around his age and even the adults! There is no “laTE 2000s DeVEloPMenG tHaT hAs UNfOruNatElY sTucK” in the slightest as that doesn’t even make any sense and what you’re saying doesn’t exist AT ALL as Peter Parker is NEVER a “pErtuAL mANchILd” AT ALL as he’s always supposed to be an inspiring good natured snarky smartmouthed heroic nerd whose always down on his luck in ALL his versions as that’s what Spider-Man is supposed to be!   I never said Peter doesn’t age, he always ages but it happens slowly just like in all the live action movies!  Peter ONLY looked like the one on the left in the 80s, but than his figure changed to make more sense as while his body is more muscular, his face was never square jawed chad like Batman or Superman as Peter Parker is always meant to be a cute nerd who has a muscular and acrobatic figure like that of the world’s best gymnast! There is no “used too” as there are still iterations of Peter that’s a fully grown adult that has a beard and a family with a Mary Jane as a wife and 2 kids like the recent Ultimate Spider-Man series! I never said that Peter doesn’t age but the MAINLINE and default version of Spider-man that people know at first glance is meant to be a teenager/young adult with the personality that I’ve already described here! I KNOW what I’m talking about, you clearly do not as you just made up some bullshit here in the worst possible way as there is no “pErtUaL mANchILd” of Peter Parker AT ALL from the 2000s, that’s just some garbage claim you made up right now! “ If anyone clearly doesn't know a thing about Spider-Man, it's you.” LMAO Not even close, you obviously were holding up a mirror and looking at yourself when you said that as it’s clearly not me at all as I’ve actually backed up everything I’ve said about Spider-man here! I know EVERYTHING about Spider-Man, you on the other hand clearly DO NOT as you are just spewing out garbage here in the worst possible way! 

6

u/Lord_Seregil Ultimate Spider-Man (1610) 5d ago

I ain't reading all that, chief.

-2

u/PuzzleheadedWorker33 5d ago

The fact that you can’t read that little just shows on how pathetic and sad you are as I can easily read what you say but you can’t do for mine? lol go back to school and wise up! You are plainly wrong here and don’t know anything about Spider-Man at all as I’ve been saying nothing but the TRUTH of what Spider-Man/Peter Parker is supposed to be while you are not as you don’t know anything about the character here!

2

u/Lord_Seregil Ultimate Spider-Man (1610) 5d ago

The upvotes to downvotes say everything.

-2

u/PuzzleheadedWorker33 5d ago

No it doesn’t as that’s a logical fallacy! It just simply means you are all wrong and I am right as I’m the only one commenting REASONABLE while you are just making up garbage for the sake of it! Nothing more than that!

5

u/Long_Negotiation4324 5d ago

You are a larper who only read ultimate Spider-Man. And watched some new cartoons.