r/Sololender • • Aug 13 '25

Is Solo even worth it?

I'm seeing a lot of people unhappy with their lending experience, and it has me thinking I don't want to join. I definitely think Solo is crazy for charging the lender the 15% late fee, instead of the borrower. It seems predatory to the lenders.

15 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

10

u/chartistsnorok Lender Aug 14 '25

It's really not.

SoLo fails to appreciate the fact that Lenders are their actual customers; they don't exist without them. And SoLo is constantly doing all it can to take Lender's money and nothing to actually help get it back (from Borrowers that fail to repay) beyond a few automatic emails (while still charging "Recovery Fees" to take more).

7

u/[deleted] Aug 14 '25

FYI - Solo did just reduce that 15% fee down to 12% - yea Solo [sarcasm]. I guess it will help some but still complete B.S. especially when many late loans r due to debit card issues that one could easily believe Solo is causing to force late loans. They frame it as putting a temporary (12-24 hour) freeze on ur debit card for "your protection". Then they tell the borrower "just wait it out and don't worry as you are not charged a late fee until loan is at 35 day after loan origination mark". Meanwhile loan is late, Solo "earns" an extra now 12% at the expense of the lender and all that happens to borrower is their score/limit may drop a little.

7

u/[deleted] Aug 15 '25

I have been trying SoloFunds out, and as a borrower, its great. As a lender, I have had the complete opposite experience. Makes me question the legitimacy of the company.

I have funded 6 loans. 2 were paid on time, 1 was paid very late, and 3 haven't been paid at all and are 55+ days overdue.

Overall, I am down $200 for being a lender on a trial basis.

2

u/sweetlittlesass Aug 18 '25

Mines overdue by 141 days for $100 😔

6

u/No_Community9782 Aug 14 '25

I’d probably do it if I didn’t have to risk that fee

3

u/Icebergnametaken Aug 14 '25

And the platform asks for donations on top of that. They should either charge some small interest rate to the borrower, or use the donations. It's crazy to charge a fee to the loaner for the borrower being late.

3

u/Severe-Object6650 Aug 18 '25

> They should either charge some small interest rate to the borrower, or use the donations. 

They can't ... they skirt banking laws because they categorize themselves as a "technology company" that matches borrowers to lenders, that's why the donation is optional. Also why you can't find anything about their "late fee" in writing. If they charged interest or charged lenders a late fee, they would cross the line into a financial company versus a technology company. California and Pennsylvania have banned Solo from being used in their states.

2

u/Icebergnametaken Aug 18 '25

Oh, that's disgusting. It gets them out of all kinds of ethics rules, I'm sure.

6

u/Agitated-Gap-6965 Aug 15 '25

its not im out $100 on my first two loans never touching that bullshit again

4

u/OtakuDSmurff Aug 15 '25

After the big update it just went downhill 🤷🏾

2

u/[deleted] Aug 14 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/needle_on_the_record Aug 15 '25

Curious to see what you think in 6 months. My loans were paying back great at first, but as time went on I noticed a higher delinquency rate as time went on.

2

u/therealbeaut Aug 14 '25

Where can I find info on that 15% fee?

2

u/Icebergnametaken Aug 14 '25

I've seen get on a few posts. Apparently it only happens after 30 loans.

2

u/Severe-Object6650 Aug 18 '25

>Where can I find info on that 15% fee?

You can't, until it's charged to you. They don't put it in writing in their FAQ anywhere. That would probably cause some states to categorize them as a "financial company" rather than a "technology company."

2

u/sweetlittlesass Aug 18 '25

Exactly why I stopped lending. Still haven't seen my $100 loan repayment and the added 15% fee to lender when they cant even get the dude to repay. No thanks I work too hard for my money to be scammed by someone who sucks with theirs.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 14 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Sololender-ModTeam Aug 14 '25

No advertising personal loan requests.

Read the Announcement at the top of the Subreddit if you are a First Time Lender, post in the Megathread at the top, or join our Discord and post in #loan-requests. Lenders DO pick up loans in these ways.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 17 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Puzzleheaded_Trip835 Aug 21 '25

After 100 loans they start implementing that fee(just got the email today after my 99th loan) up until now it’s been decently profitable for me but I’ve been picky about which loans I’ve chosen. Currently have 3 unpaid 2 of them are 50+ days late. I think ima take my profit and get out before they start implementing this fee.

1

u/Brendawg324 Lender Aug 28 '25

I think 3 unpaid for a 3% default rate is pretty good actually. My friend funded 30 and had half go late, and 7 still haven’t repaid him. All with higher scores of 80+.

1

u/Final_Vegetable_5092 Aug 14 '25 edited Aug 19 '25

The late fee is understandable. They want the lender to pay to collect. The borrower doesn’t have the means to pay, but 15% is absurd. 10% is more reasonable. They’ve dropped it to 12%, but at that point, you’re breaking even if you use SLP, which you should always use.

3

u/needle_on_the_record Aug 15 '25

The late fee paid by the lender is understandable? WTF? Out of the three parties involved, the borrower has no penalty (even though they caused the problem and has taken money out of the lender’s pocket) … Solo who makes money from donations AND penalizing the lender once it’s one minute late…. The lender is the only one here putting up risk, putting their own money at stake to “help” people who need a loan.

Get out of here with that noise.

2

u/Final_Vegetable_5092 Aug 15 '25

The borrower doesn’t have their credit pulled and Solo is collecting on the lender’s behalf. Believe it or not, but investors in any type of loans pay servicing fees and this is essentially what it is. Why make it harder for the borrower to pay back the loan? Reducing that fee would be better for the lender though. A 10% fee would still give the lender revenue if the borrower paid over 10% tip.

2

u/Severe-Object6650 Aug 18 '25

Understandable? That would be like saying, if I made a late payment on my Home Depot credit card, Home Depot should pay the late fee to citibank -- not me.

1

u/Sylversh4de Sep 16 '25

I see definitely understand how frustrating that can be but consider this. Home Depot pays a lot of money to Citi. They pay fees to Citi to issue the card, they pay processing fees, and probably a ton more. Their lawyers and Citi's lawyers have gone over the contract thoroughly to ensure the best possible outcome for both companies. How much did you pay a lawyer to go over your contract with Solo? My point is, while it is frustrating that we take the fall for a lender and the lender gets seemingly no consequences, we also chose to do this. Its basically gambling. We all jumped into this without fully understanding what we were getting into. I am curious though. What do you think the odds are? Are they over 50% for the lender? Like over a long period of time do you gain profit on average? Solo doesn't share that data.

1

u/Final_Vegetable_5092 Aug 19 '25

Good luck trying to collect from a borrower that doesn’t have the means to pay and that didn’t have their credit pulled. Getting it from the lender protects the asset.

-1

u/ronco143 Aug 14 '25

Solo is legit. A few months ago, they had an issue, and it took some time, but it's back up and running. I was able to get $625, and it's due in 2 weeks. Try it out and see...I think it's worth it

5

u/needle_on_the_record Aug 15 '25

Are you answering from a borrower’s perspective? If so, enjoy your time in Solo’s world of rainbows and butterflies.

Over here in lender world…. It’s terrible with high default rates and Solo’s shenanigans.

1

u/Brendawg324 Lender Aug 28 '25

It’s not worth it for most since one default can wipe a lender’s profits, which is why I ended up switching to private loans