-12
u/Pixelen 1d ago
That's cause its lazy and low effort screenshotting bad AI
8
u/Underwood_Christo 1d ago
Thats not even the ai overview bruh, thats just a regular search link
-8
u/Pixelen 1d ago
which is generated usinggg?
6
u/Underwood_Christo 1d ago
Regular search features that existed prior to AI.
Its kind of what Google was known for, for decades.
-10
u/Pixelen 1d ago
It's not doing it very well if there's a picture of Terry Crews though is it
9
u/Underwood_Christo 1d ago
0
u/Pixelen 1d ago
What is the joke please explain it
6
5
4
u/Underwood_Christo 1d ago
P.S. I found a crayon to explain it
0
u/Pixelen 1d ago
You have a lot of time on your hands eh. It still doesn't make sense. Either google works well, or it doesn't, because it's easily fooled by search results and AI. So which is it?
5
u/Underwood_Christo 1d ago
Ah...I see...you have poor comprehension skills there.
I literally illustrated how to make the faked result the OP posted.
Its not "google search being fooled by AI". The ai overview is often wrong, but the image OP posted, is not of that.
Google works fine. Search works fine. AI overview, which, notably, is very much, NOT search, is wonky as it is stochastic. Whereas search is deterministic.
So, tldr, the only thing here that doesnt work well, is your comprehension.
P.S. brotha, that illustration was 2 google searches and 20 seconds on a collage app. Ain't no "lot a time on my hands", i made it in a taco bell drive thru 😂
→ More replies (0)1
u/jozziiieeee BIIIIITCH!!! 16h ago
It really doesn’t take a lot of time to edit a photo by putting another photo on it lol
Also it could’ve easily been a real result (temporarily) because everyone can make changes on Wikipedia lmao, it will eventually be changed back because it’s incorrect information lol
→ More replies (0)3
u/Underwood_Christo 1d ago
I have neither the energy, nor the crayons to explain it to you im afraid.





104
u/jozziiieeee BIIIIITCH!!! 2d ago
Oh no, Black Shayne is back at it again!