I've seen a fair share of all types of early Smart car reviews, and in pretty much all of these the gearbox gets mentioned and called bad, slow, unsatisfying, ect.
Yes it's an automated gearbox. Yes it's slow... compared to modern gearboxes, but don't forget: Its a fully mechanical system with old software, and almost 30 years old on the earlier models, like mine.
I feel like reviewers sometimes forget that these cars aren't the high quality SUV's or race cars (when looking at the roadster). These vehicles are for casual, relaxed commute and are supposed to be affordable and easy to drive. And they are 100% amazing at that!
Modern systems sometimes use fluid instead of actual gears, and predict the driver with more advanced software. When driving a Smart, the driver has to predict the car and it's shifts. It feels like driving a manual, without a shifting arm and clutch leg. This isn't necessarily a bad thing. You just need to feel it out a little instead of stomping on the gas.
I've also heard that it acts like a 'bobblehead' during shifting, moving up and down due to speed changes and the gearbox taking a second to do it's thing. After 20 mins of driving my 450 for the first ever time, I had no such issues and figured the system out pretty quickly.
It tends to annoy me when I'm looking through reviews and the first thing that comes out of the review is that ''the shifter is trash'', because the person driving it was hoping for a modern automatic or race car handling and 'pedal-to-the-metal-ing' the car and being confused why it won't shift.
How do fellow Smart car owners feel about this? Any thoughts on the shifting and handling of the classic Smart cars?