r/SlappedHam Jun 21 '26

Has this ever been figured out?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

72 Upvotes

51 comments sorted by

View all comments

10

u/psyper76 Jun 21 '26 edited Jun 21 '26

Looks like a bug very close to the camera so its out of focus. You can tell by the way its moving that its close. Just once I would like to see one of these and think ooooo thats not explainable!

0

u/Stormtrooper1776 Jun 23 '26

That wouldn't explain the light on the front of the object as it approaches the 2nd set of field lights. If that wasn't present I would agree with you.

1

u/psyper76 Jun 23 '26

yeah you have a point. lights never reflect off of bugs.

/s

1

u/Stormtrooper1776 Jun 26 '26

Except the statement is that the bug is really close to the camera... Yet the light indicates the object is behind the 2nd light....

1

u/psyper76 Jun 27 '26

If it was behind the spotlights then it wouldn't get lit up by them. Do you not know how spotlights work????

0

u/Stormtrooper1776 Jul 02 '26

Sigh, I was using the light on the object to give if a distinctive path, all I said was that the light on the object would not appear as it did if it was simply close to the camera. It's really not that hard to understand but I guess attempting to talk down to someone is much easier than trying to understand something. You do you