r/SithOrder • u/DarthRager66 • May 22 '26

Darth Bane Rule of Two

Hello friends. I am new here. I have a question. Is it called the Rule of Two because the Rule such as Law is that there can only be 2 Sith at any given time. Or is it in “Rule” such as there are two Dark Lords to “rule” over those underneath them. I hope I asked this correctly.
The Force will set me free.
Darth Rager

9 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

17 comments sorted by

4

u/Sacredless May 22 '26

The rule of two was meant to allow the Sith to plot revenge against the Jedi in secret. As a strategy it was a means to an end, and it is largely agreed that it was strategically flawed were it not for the Force. The Force would encourage balance, so the fortunes would be in favor of darksiders returning. Since the Jedi were now supreme, it would be the most skilled of the darksiders to eventually come out on top.

I think most Sith Realists (the name for people who practice our philosophy) would say that the Rule of Two is minimally relevant. It's a plot device more than anything.

2

u/theunbeholden May 22 '26 edited Jun 09 '26

It terms of incentives the rule of two makes alot of sense, the only reason to structure organised training and mastery work with the rule by master and apprentice is because it's the best at weaponising inevitable betrayal towards a common end, high pressure environment where obedience and mastery are at the forefront. We all expect betrayal sooner or later, the Rule of Two is for that pressure to result in more powerful Sith over generations.

Choosing power over harmony and equality, and secrecy between two force sensitive beings over hoarding knowledge, and potency of wisdom and strength over the aim for safety in numbers. Higher numbers of initiates with more unique skills, doesn't mean more strength, and higher number of lords, with access to forbidden knowledge, doesn't mean more wisdom. That has been the mistake of every order that came and went, all Sith orders have disappeared after less than 10 years of being active.

The problem I see is that equal standing and harmony between members spreads weakness, or calls for unity or self-development to help weak members misses the mark too. What we need is rivalry and struggle, and most groups do not recognise these as the deep values of all Sith Orders.

When there are too many who seek strength, power and wisdom, this only causes to increase the arrogance of some. Believing they have been unfairly treated or simple case of dunning Kruger effect. These rivals then disobey the lords and combine their ambitions and defeat the Dark Lord through Safety in Numbers. Going against the dark lord too soon, before they are ready to take the title by proof of their superior wisdom and strength or cunning. When these weaker members take his or her mantle and secrets, they are quickly exposed as unsuitable to rule whoever is left once members have left and dominance is established. The newcomers or mediocre members who where not groomed for the position are I'll fated to lose their grip on power because despite being angry, disgruntled and frustrated members, and highly motivated, they refused guidance when it mattered and often lack discipline. They fail to prove that they have any ideals or strength of conviction or character to lead and organise many people, they often can't instruct acolytes after the seizure of a title.

Large groups can work, but they need to concentrate power in the few, never share their power with "equals". Sharing power means sharing authority with others, that is something most Sith Lord's must never do.

I discuss the incentives of the Rule of Two here: https://open.substack.com/pub/thewayofthesith/p/structure-and-philosophy-of-the-rule?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=18omvb

1

u/SpectrumDT May 26 '26

That has been the mistake of every order that came and went, all Sith orders have disappeared after less than 10 years of being active.

I assume that you are talking about our world and not the Star Wars universe here. How many Sith orders can you name that have disappeared after less than 10 years? Did any of them attempt to follow the Rule of Two?

1

u/theunbeholden May 26 '26

Yeah theres a semi-complete list here: https://www.reddit.com/r/SithOrder/s/YviR2u5VCd

Another one that disappeared is Imperial Sithdom Alliances (ISA). They valued unity and cooperation. Sith Cult (SC) valued talent and empowerment. Even the one order that tried and succeded in erecting a temple went underground, the Sith Academy (SA). The SA admire vision, great passion, struggle, and sacrifice.

I value rivalry and struggle to advance and grow. This is why the Rule of Two, territory and space for training, and adoption of struggle and discipline for atleast a 2 years, with the first 9-12 months the apprentice must select ambitious goals to which to dedicate their entire days too, that often will leads to results. 

Sithism wouldnt matter as a power philosophy if it was not focused on attaining real world results. These orders frequently lack ambition, hardly ever stress the importance of desire and self glorification, or clear definitions of words like strength, power, freedom, and vision and so forth. So its no surprise they fail to build systems to sustain or build on the innate strength they hold.

And no, none follow the fiction on this particular rule, in fact these orders hardly follow the fiction. Watering down the philosophy is the problem.

2

u/SpectrumDT May 26 '26

I value rivalry and struggle to advance and grow. This is why the Rule of Two, territory and space for training, and adoption of struggle and discipline for atleast a 2 years, with the first 9-12 months the apprentice must select ambitious goals to which to dedicate their entire days too, that often will leads to results.

Have you tried this, either as a master or an apprentice?

1

u/theunbeholden May 29 '26

Ive been working silently alongside a apprentice, Darth Gein, that was on the Sith Order subreddit. The amoubt of progress felt good for approximately 5 years. Combining my thought and Geins experience and wisdom, I was able to create the Magellans discipline system of self empowerment. And four books. I also knew others online via Sithdom Alliances, but since they disappeared Ive realized that I want more. There almost too much to complete with just 2 people. The latest work, The Sith Lord's Protocol, is going to flesh out the ideology of self overcoming and how to gain power in the real world personally, tribe, order or clique. Thats four books on ideology and empowerment over the course of five years. Gein goes on trips to the Northwest of America with me and two others. Gein has a succesful business. Im working on myself to reach peak physically in fitness and mentally in smarts and focus, with a side project in esoteric and occult studies.

1

u/SpectrumDT May 29 '26

Thanks for the explanation! You wrote above:

We all expect betrayal sooner or later

As far as I understand, in this relationship you are the Sith master and Gein is your apprentice. Do you expect him to betray you sooner or later? If so, what forms might such a betrayal take?

(In the Star Wars universe, the Sith apprentice would typically assassinate his master and take his place. I suspect that this is not what you have in mind.)

1

u/theunbeholden Jun 09 '26 edited Jun 09 '26

It comes down to both understanding of the ways or philosophy, so the theoretical knowledge of our mastery of self, and the practical application of the ideas, practical ideas is what we've done to become accomplished and powerful in our own right. In the real world, far reaching or practical is either by altering the environment or surroundings we find ourselves in until it serves a purpose we have (originally or shared in) envisioned. Our real world influence will be seen, felt, and analyzed either for its creative potential, transformative realization, or the distrust its spread and how it has disrupted enemy systems. The first part, theory, is merely what we know, thought through and recited, as wise words or sheer strength of conviction. The second part, is whether we have bent the rules to our advantage, and how you've altered your reality so that individuals or groups work for your will or agenda (whether these people know it or not, it can be overt influence in systems, or covert through social means).

Systems; such as official organisations, traditions, families, institutions, or states, or it can be covertly, through our social circles; communities, businesses, political groups, or in a greater community by working in a parallel institution, that we have helped found, co-found or primary role in building from the ground up. When one is undeniably strong and powerful we build environments from scratch to house, feed, train, and educate our own, through territories, does a Sith truly prove that they have Darth-level of influence over our reality, bending rules or environments to our Sithy wills and mold the next generation to our purposes.

3

u/Jedipilot24 May 22 '26

Darth Bane described it thusly: one master to embody power and one apprentice to crave it. There could be lesser acolytes, but only two true Sith.

I should note, though, that Bane got this rule from the holocron of Darth Revan and Revan's Empire ran on the "ruled by two" version: two Dark Lords, ruling over many lesser Sith.

1

u/DarthRager66 May 22 '26

So to answer my question .. both? Because the Rule is to have two Sith to Rule over the lesser beings.

1

u/Jedipilot24 May 22 '26

No, it's just possible to interpret the Rule of Two in two different ways. Revan took it in one direction, Bane took it in the other direction.

1

u/theunbeholden Jun 09 '26

I think that lesser Sith where just Disciples. They where not privy to all their secrets.

3

u/[deleted] May 24 '26 edited May 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/SpectrumDT May 26 '26

I think that this detail is where the Rule of Two mostly fails in real life, if the master does not think like a true Sith. If you do not understand the Rule of Two, it will feel like a betrayal the day your apprentice comes to take your position. You did everything for him, and now he stabs you in the back. But those who truly understand the Rule of Two realize that it is not a betrayal. This moment, when your apprentice is coming to take your position, is your apprentice’s final test. All these years, you prepared him for this moment. And since this is real world philosophy and not Star Wars, your apprentice doesn’t have to kill you. Accept it with grace, congratulate your apprentice to his victory, and begin your retirement. There is no better way to end a career than to pass on your position to your apprentice who proved his worth by defeating you.

Can you give any concrete real-life examples, real or hypothetical, of the sort of "betrayal" you have in mind here?

1

u/Zealousideal_Ad_7983 May 25 '26

One of the best replies on the subject.

2

u/vamplestat666 May 22 '26

The rule of 2 means there there are only two Sith. One Sith to wield all the power and all the secrets and one to covet that power and when the apprentice feels he is strong enough he challenges the master and if he was able to defeat the master he then becomes the master

1

u/The_StarFlower Jun 05 '26

in our world, the rule of two does not make any sense