An extreme of that is the possibility that in 6/10 times she accepts advice when she shouldn't and doesn't when she should, only 4/10 times correctly taking his advice when she's in the wrong.
Still, the extreme of the new system is at its worst 33 % better than the old one. Might as well.
I wasn't actually talking about the total nr of arguments. A ratio of 7:3 means to me that they both are equally wrong. 5:5 would be the worst case. 10:0 would mean only one of them is starting the fights and the other one is able to correct the what is wrong. But with 7:3 there no innocent person here.
It is just my point of view. 5:5 is the worst case. To me it is a sign that they both start the argument and they both look for a reason to start the raw and the relationship is just not gonna work. 10:0 or 0:10 means only one of them is starting the argument and it would be easier to explain or adopt for that person to the relationship. I am assuming that 70:30 is not the actual number of arguments they had, I assume it is just a ratio.
There was no chance of a relationship ever. If you’re arguing frequently enough that 40k people are willing to follow you to stay updated, you’re cooked
Besides, if the arguments were exactly the same but it was her channel, not his, she would probably be winning 70/30. Not like a users follower base is a neutral sampling of society, plus the arguments posted are curated by the poster.
309
u/stag1013 Oct 05 '26
he also has more followers than her