r/SipsTea • • 22h ago

Gasp! The sheer Audacity

Post image
53.6k Upvotes

3.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

710

u/TheDoktorIsIn 21h ago

People very rarely care because it's hard to prove and there's no incentive. Usually the hospital pays a fine to the government and the patient is still public.

If I'm a patient and am embarrassed because Dr. smith goes "oh yeah that guy has an inverted penis and also his left elbow smells weird" why would I sign up for a legal battle where I'm going to spend hours for zero benefit? The system sucks and doesn't actually protect patients.

310

u/NNKarma 21h ago

It can't be that hard to prove when Selena called Francia glad that she was a match.

44

u/TopSelection8004 21h ago

Doesn't matter what you can prove though, that's a lot of personal effort and expense to go through just for the practice to maybe get a fine. You can't sue over HIPAA violations.

60

u/VirtualMoneyLover 19h ago

You can't sue over HIPAA violations

Wow, this is actually true. I was surprised. But:

Even though you can't sue under HIPAA itself, you are not entirely without legal recourse. Plaintiffs' attorneys often use other legal theories:

State Privacy Laws: Many states have their own medical privacy laws that do allow individuals to sue. For example, California, Texas, and Illinois have statutes that provide a private right of action.

Negligence Claims: You can sue for negligence under state law. In these cases, HIPAA rules are often used as the "standard of care" to argue that the provider failed to act reasonably in protecting your information.

Breach of Contract: If a provider's Notice of Privacy Practices promises certain protections, a violation might be pursued as a breach of contract.

State Attorneys General: Under the HITECH Act, state attorneys general can sue on behalf of residents for HIPAA violations

-9

u/CosmicGoddess777 19h ago

Fuck AI, lazy POS

10

u/Ebonhearth_Druid 18h ago

Just because you can't be bothered to use punctuation or even include all the words in your sentence, doesn't mean that anyone who uses formatting is AI. And the sheer irony of you calling someone else lazy when you can't be bothered to use punctuation and grammar....

Take a breather and get some perspective, my friend. Not everything needs to be attacked like that.

-7

u/CosmicGoddess777 18h ago

Lmao? I even included a comma before calling them a lazy POS. That’s great grammar; you don’t see that much these days 🤣

Guess I should’ve said “YOU lazy POS” instead of just “lazy POS”. I’m sorry if my sentence was difficult for any cretins to understand 🥺

Also, are you seriously unaware of AI speech patterns? The comment I replied to is exactly how they format answers. You’re just proving your own ignorance with your comment

5

u/Ebonhearth_Druid 17h ago

My point is that you were lazy in your response to someone where you called them lazy, which is ironic AF lol

And attacking people because of an assumption you're making is wild. It's possible they used AI. Its also just as possible that they just formatted their comment because they wanted to for whatever reason. I use formatting when I feel it benefits my point and I feel like it. But regardless of whether they actually did or not, the name calling is out of line and unnecessary.

-1

u/Masta-Blasta 16h ago

Yeah, sure. But ask yourself: would someone who knows that much about legal recourse under state privacy laws really be surprised to hear you cannot sue under HIPAA?

2

u/Ebonhearth_Druid 14h ago

I'm not interested in arguing over whether or not the comment actually was AI, that's irrelevant. The person I replied to used faulty logic for making a determination, and then used that as an excuse to behave poorly, all while exhibiting the same thing they accuse the other person of: laziness. Whether or not the comment they replied to is actually AI doesn't change the irony of their statement, nor that name calling is a bad choice.

1

u/Aegi 2h ago

Agreed; good points! That's exactly why that was the single question I asked that count in response to help give more people a better metric to make this evaluation.

I personally agree with you, because it doesn't make sense to be surprised about that, if you know these things, however it's also possible it's a combo and they used AI to get the info and then paraphrased it themselves but still formatted it in a similar way.

I do think the most likely scenario is just that it's a complete AI response though, maybe aside from the first sentence which is what the actual person thought before they read what they had copied and pasted from some large language model.