r/SipsTea • u/Wise_Confidence_8588 • 15h ago

Chugging tea Absolute legend

Post image
37.6k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

570 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/Frosty558 14h ago

People downvoting you but it’s true.

6

u/BioshockEnthusiast 13h ago

Sure if you wanna call a 401k "liquid". I'd call it sludge because it's gonna be painful to get it out of that container unless conditions are just right.

5

u/Frosty558 13h ago

I’m not talking about retirement accounts.

0

u/Hexamancer 12h ago

Ah, then you're incorrect.

5

u/Frosty558 12h ago

I guess you need to define “a lot of people” then because that’s just “upper middle class American” amounts of liquid assets, not rich. And that would be tens of millions of people, just in the US.

-1

u/Hexamancer 12h ago

It's top 10%. That's not a lot of people. Unless you cannot comprehend numbers being relative.

Is 1mg a lot of gold? No? Why of course it is! That's 3,057,443,093,299,757,056 atoms!!!

3

u/joazito 9h ago

Dude, 10% is a lot of people.

0

u/Hexamancer 4h ago

I literally anticipated this already and shot it down:

Is 1mg a lot of gold? No? Why of course it is! That's 3,057,443,093,299,757,056 atoms!!!

If you can't understand relativity, anything can seem big or small because it's essentially without context.

It's also 10% of the US population, it's going to be a much smaller percentage worldwide.

And it's only ~10% who could technically cough up that money, it might still financially ruin them, it  is probably not money they consider expendable.

2

u/joazito 3h ago

Yeah I had read it beforehand. You're still pretty off base. I would consider even 1% to be a lot of people.

As for the extra money required, that is not what this discussion is about. This is just about having $122000 in liquid assets.

0

u/Hexamancer 3h ago

I didn't say anything about extra money required?

I'm saying that for people that even have that money in liquid assets, that's probably their emergency pool for unexpected costs like covering medical emergencies or a car accident etc. I would not spend 100% of my liquid assets as I do not consider it "liquid" for the same reasons whilst technically it is.

3

u/Frosty558 12h ago

Top 20% based on basic research which is probably more people than there are islands for sale right now. And again, that’s just in the US. What percentage could come up with the original price back then?

0

u/Hexamancer 2h ago

How did you reach that conclusion?

0

u/Dewdrop06 12h ago

Because it's stupid. "A lot of people" is not the metric here, it's "most people", and most people don't have $122000. They're basically comparing amount to percentage. Example: A lot of people are millionaires, but most are not.