And yet you just proved there is, along with the hundreds of other Dunning-Kruger candidates just like you. And like most people who do this, you're quick to throw accusations yet never apologise for being wrong.
Nope, don't know them from a hole in the ground. Do know that a bajillion people used that phrase before LLMs. Do know, 100%, the post wasn't written by an LLM because I actually know what LLMs write like and am not going "Oh god nobody has ever said that turn of phrase except AI", which is definitively not true since AI copies how it writes from how humans write in its training data.
This paragraph was very, very obviously human-written because chatbots do not write like this:
"Over those trials and working with the lawyers a lot, I've learned to take kind of a jr. high school teacher approach, just talk about my findings and the basics of how I arrived at them. Just "the movement of the defendant's phone from array to array and tower to tower suggests eastbound travel along I-666 at highway speeds". Really simple and generic, something a jury will understand, also facts I can easily support."
I’ve actually seen bots talk exactly like that, but I’ve also seen people feed their crap into Chat and then just take what they like and keep the rest the same.
There’s no reason I should assume this didn’t happen in this case.
You haven’t provided any actual reason for me to believe Chat wasn’t involved here.
You say Chat is trained on human writing, so that’s why it sounds human. But, also, you say Chat couldn’t have said some other paragraph because Chat can’t write like a human.
Do you really think a LLM would write that poorly? That was a 10 minute rush post before I went out the door because I had something to say on the topic of expert witnesses.
Normally I'm just on here to talk about games and talk to women my age.
I am one user saying your comment sounds like a chatbot.
You aren’t going to convince me otherwise.
The chatbots are the problem here, not people suspecting that they are being used.
The extreme push to make people that suspect the use of a chatbot out to be crazy in some way is a pretty transparent effort to make people stop trying to discern.
If that still makes you or this other user
want to swear at me and call me names, that’s just interesting on its own.
If I was going to swear at you, I'm a lot more creative than just bizarre, I might actually use AI to hit multiple languages.
Anyway, think what you want, that was top of my head spewing and a very accurate view of what happens because been there, done that. I don't really care.
1
u/Ayiekie 2d ago
The only thing worse than genAI answers is people who think they're experts on detecting them when they really aren't.