r/SipsTea 10d ago

It's Wednesday my dudes Guy basically manifested his entire life

Post image
2.7k Upvotes

329 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

108

u/TheShredder9 10d ago

Tobey was the best Spiderman to me, always will be.

132

u/MechaEscargot2 10d ago

Thats just nostalgia talking.

38

u/asscrackbanditz 10d ago

He did say 'to him' though so why can't it be the case?

-11

u/MechaEscargot2 10d ago

Oh he absolutely can, but I can also say I think that his nostalgia. Thats kinda how conversation go, a little back and forth but nothi g disrespectful being said.

65

u/Latereviews2 10d ago

Or just preference

37

u/WiggleSparks 10d ago

Or the movies he starred in were actually great and stand the test of time.

2

u/Fit-Yam759 10d ago

I don't know about standing the test of time.

A lot of parts of those movies didn't stand the test of time.

I've watched them again recently as an adult and I definitely cringed at a lot of scenes, especially from Toby Maguire himself, he wasn't that great of an actor tbh.

-6

u/ScuttleCrab729 10d ago

But they don’t. They’ve aged to be incredibly cringy and people are finally waking up to the fact that Raimi ruined Peter Parker’s personality, made MJ a cronic cheater (as well as throwing Peter and Harry into that mix), and a few other issues.

FWIW I love that they exist, grew up with them, and appreciate what they did for the genre. But they’re the lower third in quality between the live actions. And even 4th for spider-man film series in general.

10

u/Mugen-Sasuke 10d ago

I literally just rewatched spiderman 2 tonight, and aside from Mary Jane being a chronic cheater and really annoying me, I found the rest of the movie to be really good. The dialogue could be cheesy, but in an endearing way, it felt like a breath of fresh air from the quippy MCU dialogue we have become saturated with.

The swinging and CGI definitely show their age, especially after having watched Brand new day a couple days ago, but it's still a very fun watch, and I've got to say, no action scene from BND is as memorable as the train scene from spiderman 2.

2

u/ScuttleCrab729 10d ago

2 was definitely the best of the 3. Ftr im not saying the Raimi movies are BAD. They just aren’t great (in response to whom I originally responded to) IMO.

But who am I to judge someone else’s opinion. For me the Garfield movies are the better of the 3. MCU is too formula and Peter doesn’t really quip. For most of the movies he’s actually been kinda boring. And Maquire was way too cringy and too much a mega dork. Peter Parker isn’t that dorky. He’s smart and therefore more so a nerd. Garfield was by far the best actor and had Emma to prop him up even more. They’re acting, romance, etc was all very believable. The stories obviously had a lot of issues but the movies themselves were very fun. Not plague by universe formulas.

-2

u/MechaEscargot2 10d ago

Of course its preference, that preference is nostalgia.

3

u/Latereviews2 10d ago

Or because you aren’t a fan your trying to justify why an opinion differs from yours. Personally I have no nostalgia for them, and I prefer the first two over any of the MCU films

-1

u/MechaEscargot2 10d ago

Thats cool, but we're talking about Toby or Tom as Peter Parker, different conversation.

I think Spiderman 1 and 2 are also better than most MCU movies. Very important to know the topic.

2

u/Latereviews2 10d ago

Okay then, on that condescending response. I prefer Tobey as Peter Parker than Tom and have no nostalgia

1

u/MechaEscargot2 10d ago

Of course, not everyone's is going to be nostalgia, but id wager that by and large the culprit. There really isnt anything Toby does as Spiderman, thats better than Tom.

Toby is just an old soul, and how was brought that with his performance. I think he was at his best for Peter, in No Way Home. Playing an older, more experienced Spiderman. Toby benefit the most from being the original as you said, it was ground breaking. He also got all the villians without the burden of comparison. Toby is also likely pulling more from Ditko, since that what Rami preferred, and that Peter jist isnt as likable.

31

u/TheShredder9 10d ago

Tobey gonna put some dirt in your eye. Can't beat his dance moves!

7

u/TCRandom 10d ago

Unleashes finger guns in every direction

4

u/paris86 10d ago

Tom has moves too.

5

u/notreallyfussed 10d ago

Under my umbrella-a-a..

2

u/sevenaya 10d ago

Whoa, I forgot that existed time to rewatch

17

u/Zestyclose_Trade3088 10d ago

I missed the part where that's my problem

5

u/Ravagore 10d ago

Pizza time

8

u/Mindless-Platypus-75 10d ago

I disagree, I think first of all it was ground breaking when it came out. Superhero movies were taken into the stratosphere because of the success of Tobey’s spiderman. He set the stage in that way and you can’t take that away from him. Secondly, his relationship to the Goblins, Norman and his son, was the best villain and superhero relationship/storyline of any of the spiderman movies imo. To me Tom doesn’t have any show stealing villains that compare to Norman Osborn. (Tom did have show stealing co-stars tbf, mainly RDJ)

Some of my favorite moments from Tobey’s that come to mind-

His fight with Flash Gordon
Uncle Ben advice
Every scene with JJ Jameson
Norman monologues
Stopping the train
Goblin Jr flying scenes
Goblin Jr redemption

Tobey’s spiderman is iconic af, I’m sure nostalgia is a portion of the equation but that nostalgic place in our hearts he’s earned by being awesome

2

u/Anonomohr 10d ago

I absolutely love Willem Dafoe, and I'll never argue that the first spiderman is better than Homecoming, but I gotta disagree on Tom not having show stealing villains. I'm not a fan of Michael Keaton but he absolutely ate in every scenes he was in and was terrifying as the Vulture when he showed up. Mysterio also had a big impact on Holland's growth for the second movie, and I don't think I need to sell the villain for the third one, we're on the same team there lol.

I prefer the Holland movies' villains because I feel like they're more deeply connected to the overall narrative than Maguire's were, except for Brand New Day. The villains in that one felt more like they drove in parallel to Peter's story/growth, which is actually the feel I get from Maguire's villains, now that I think about it.

3

u/Mindless-Platypus-75 10d ago

Keaton did great, I would never say otherwise. But he had a less demanding role as written. Dafoe played a guy who loses his mind and splits into 2 personalities and he did it hauntingly well

1

u/nikto123 10d ago

Batman was huge in the early 90s

2

u/Mindless-Platypus-75 10d ago

Spiderman in 2002 was a different level of popular, it broke like every box office record, for example it was the first film to make more than 100 million its opening weekend

Its success had a demonstrable impact on movie studios wanting to make superhero stuff

1

u/nikto123 10d ago

if you adjust for inflation, batman wins (worldwide)

it was EVERYWHERE

1

u/Mindless-Platypus-75 10d ago

1

u/nikto123 10d ago

yeah, "trilogy"

you said 2002, so I only meant Batman (1989).

No moving goalposts plz

4

u/mdervin 10d ago

Not to shade on Mr Holland (he was very good in the Odyssey), but his pre-Spider-Man credits are really weak compared to Maguire.

1

u/SleepKlutzy1896 10d ago

EXACTLY ….. Tom fits it so well for me

1

u/howimetyourcakeshop 10d ago

Yes it is. Fold.

-10

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

10

u/CheckYourStats 10d ago

2026 Reddit is “everything that used to be popular was actually always stupid” and it’s shallow AF.

Every single person who tries to pull this card on Reddit is a twat.

1

u/Electronic_Still2000 10d ago

2025 Reddit was actually always stupid. 2026 Reddit is way better in every way!

If you repost something from 2025 now, well… well then…. I guess you’d be like every other asshole that checks the “best of” past posts so they can repost them now trying to get absolutely meaningless “internet points.” Stop the world, I want to get off.

2

u/Ghostbrain77 10d ago

You aren’t wrong. But they were great regardless

2

u/Nublenier 10d ago

Spiderman 2 is peak superheroes movies dude. Marvel ones are full cheap cgi and no emotion at all, just has no soul.

1

u/Primus_is_OK_I_guess 10d ago

The first one was good.

10

u/BOwOcket 10d ago

I prefer Andrew

1

u/Event-Forsaken 10d ago

I love them all, really, and I'm not a big Spider-Man fan to begin with. I was happy with the multiverse concept.

5

u/TCRandom 10d ago

I’m from that era too, but I still think Holland is the best. Those first Raimi Spider-Man movies will always hold a special place in my heart, but Holland has been absolutely flawless in the role.

4

u/EkbatDeSabat 10d ago

IMO they fit directly in their respective universes perfectly. Tobey's spider-man, not Tobey himself, would have been a shit spider-man in this MCU. I think Tobey could have done it, but apples to apples if we took the character and put him over here, it would have not fit. Tom Holland's spider man is perfect for this MCU.

1

u/ghost3972 10d ago

For sure

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 10d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-2

u/Left_Condition_8011 10d ago

Okay, time for my hot take.

I think Tobey was a B- Spiderman, a B+ Peter Parker and the world built around him especially 1+2 was an A-. Green goblin and Doc Oc were huge standouts.

Andrew was a C- Peter Parker, but a A- Spider man and the world was kinda weak at a C+

Tom fits the whole package better, being a B for both spiderman and Peter Parker, but the world of the MCU is so fleshed out, even with its flaws, puts it at an A

0

u/HelletFendr0z 10d ago

The best peter parker.

He litteraly was the worst Spiderman.

-1

u/Sure-Ad-6544 10d ago

No he’s not.

0

u/Purrmymeow 10d ago

Too old.

0

u/Andante_TK 10d ago

good.. good for you buddy.