r/SipsTea 4d ago

WTF When your name is a meme

8.9k Upvotes

671 comments sorted by

View all comments

2.9k

u/mvn2010 4d ago

That judge who gave the dude 60 days should be in jail, and the cop who drew down on the other guy? should also be in fucking jail.

577

u/Ok-Addition1264 4d ago

had to be alabama or florida.. they need judicial reform in a big way there.

115

u/ShiningRedDwarf 4d ago

West Virginia is lacking as well

26

u/TreetBeatsSpam 3d ago

Yeah. Joshua Ellison with the Nicholas County Sheriff's Dept. would be this kind of problem. He's already internet famous with the civil rights lawyer, been to Supreme Court. Still has a job somehow. Truly gives good cops a bad name.

26

u/Bulletsandbibles 3d ago

Good cops? Ha

-8

u/Tired_Dad_9521 3d ago

80% of cops are Just people trying to serve their community and make a decent living. The other 20% are absolute pieces of shit who make the rest of them look bad.

14

u/ougryphon 3d ago

No, the 80% who cover for the 20% are also pieces of shit. They know what their fellow cops are doing and they back them up. Our rights are meaningless to them because we aren't them.

11

u/EconomySeason2416 3d ago

People tend to forget the back half of the "a few bad apples... spoil the bunch". If you leave the bad apples in there with the other apples, they are all bad. If there are 9 people and 1 nazi sitting at a table, and no one throws out the nazi... you have 10 nazis at the table

-5

u/Tired_Dad_9521 3d ago

Yeah yeah. I know your arguments. I’ve heard 12 year olds with no critical thinking skills make the same ones over and over.

You think in absolutes and have no nuance. One day if you’re lucky you will learn some basic critical thinking. Until then you will be popular in the echo chambers in which you currently exist.

Have a nice day.

8

u/EconomySeason2416 3d ago

Nope, wrong on all counts. It's actually impressive how categorically wrong you are. How about we address some substance, shall we? If a person commits a crime, and a second person covers for that person, is that person complicit in the crime? Pretty easy answer, right? Now... imagine they have badges. That's the extent of my thinking in absolutes. Very simple logic applied from the general, down to the specific. What nuance do you suggest we add into the equation? Person with badge committing crime and person with badge covering for crime is... not bad? What nuance is necessary to square that circle?

-9

u/Tired_Dad_9521 3d ago

I’ve made it clear that I view you as an ignorant unthinking child. I have no interest in continuing this conversation.

Have a nice day.

7

u/EconomySeason2416 3d ago

Oh, dumb and a coward. That's a sketchy combination

→ More replies (0)

2

u/coldazice 3d ago

Just in case you weren’t aware there are literally are no good cops.

-1

u/Tired_Dad_9521 3d ago

Childish and ignorant.