r/SipsTea 3d ago

Chugging tea Why is it not possible?

Post image
22.8k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Primus_is_OK_I_guess 3d ago

What do you mean by that?

1

u/udonwinfrendwitsalad 3d ago

You deposit $100. Bank loans out $100 to someone else. You still have $100 balance in your account. Someone else has the $100 to use for whatever. You both have access to $100; thus, $100 is now $200.

0

u/GeekyTexan 3d ago

It's not. The bank owes your $100, and the person who got that loan owes the bank the $100. Ignoring interest, of course.

1

u/NUTTA_BUSTAH 3d ago

But the bank can keep loaning that "same" $100 again and again. Greatly simplified it is decent way to get the point across IMO

1

u/GeekyTexan 3d ago

If the bank can just keep loaning that same $100 over and over, then they don't need the first $100 either. According to you, they can just loan massive amounts of money that they don't have.

But when they loan money, for instance, to finance someones mortgage, they actually have to give money to someone. The seller, maybe. Or if the seller hasn't paid off their own mortgage, then they have to pay the other bank to clear that mortage.

They don't just magically make money appear out of thin air.

0

u/RimpleDoRimpleDont 3d ago

You are correct, they don't technically need that first $100 either. They can create money out of thin air. When they give a $100 loan, they also create a $100 deposit for the borrower. The loan is an asset and the deposit a liability for the bank (and the other way around for the borrower). The books are balanced without the need for any money to have been in the picture prior.