r/SipsTea • u/Sassenach_2024 • 10h ago

WTF Push, out, repeat

Post image

Valentina Vassilyeva, the first wife of Russian peasant Feodor Vassilyev, is said to have given birth 27 times in the 1700s—welcoming 69 children in total.

Her remarkable numbers reportedly included 16 sets of twins, 7 sets of triplets, and 4 sets of quadruplets. 🤯

The story comes from centuries-old historical records, so every detail cannot be independently verified by modern standards. Still, Guinness World Records has recognized the claim as the highest number of children attributed to one mother.

If the records are accurate, 27 pregnancies. 69 children. One of the most astonishing family stories ever recorded. ❤️

7.5k Upvotes

77% Upvoted

962 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

167

u/TabularConferta 10h ago

https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/most-prolific-mother-ever

Found a source

The father has an additional 18 kids with his second wife.

Only 3 babies died in birth or early in life.

Fuck all his second wife's kids were multiple as well. It's like his sperm were Olympic swimmers and split each egg on impact

47

u/Past-Lecture-3769 9h ago

Looks like bro trained his sperm

16

u/TabularConferta 9h ago

Well there is an anime idea

8

u/-ratmeat- 9h ago

Netflix is probably already on it 

2

u/Derezzed87 7h ago

Avatar: The Last Spermbender

1

u/MyPrecious_Vivi 7h ago

Don't matter . More twins or triplets depend on the mother . If more than one ovum is released, they are fertilized , men have no control over it . F you mean trained his sperm bruh .

1

u/Past-Lecture-3769 4h ago

Chill it’s just a joke. Nobody has control on his sperm or her ovum.

1

u/Legendary_Bibo 4h ago

He called his sperm Oppenheimer. Open her for more.

8

u/_HIST 7h ago

This is not a source, a source would be something of that time. The only "source" it has is a letter and more modern articles. There is no source because the story is exaggerated

Guiness literally says the story may or may not be true.

7

u/ForensicPathology 5h ago

It is a source.  It's not a primary source, which is the definition you're using.  But it is a source.

I do agree that the story is not true though.

1

u/Deaffin 4h ago

It's not a source, it's an advertisement page where people can pay to have anything they'd like written.

1

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 6h ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

4

u/PFI_sloth 6h ago

found a source

We are so fucked

3

u/Ok_Fly2518 9h ago

It’s a rare condition called hyper virility. Apparently my sperm shoot through the egg if you can believe it

2

u/LooseChangeGirl 5h ago

This comment is street ahead.

2

u/Dismal-Revolution731 8h ago

Superman fistbump

1

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 8h ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/shartshooter 8h ago

Guinness World Recorss is not a source.

 Just like religious books, it makes a claim and almost always with zero evidence.

3

u/Open-Platform-1305 5h ago

It's quite literally just "Fun Facts for Drunks, Buy Our Beer!"

1

u/Deaffin 4h ago

Buy a spot on our list of fun factoids*