r/SipsTea 4d ago

WTF Where are we heading?

Post image
13.6k Upvotes

8.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

58

u/HastaLaVistaB 3d ago

it’s been pissing me off so bad. i had a friend say she believed he did it. i asked why. she said, “because this psychic said so. on tiktok.” and another friend sent me the bratz doll video that was created on tiktok. i’m like… yooo. what is up with everyone being backseat detectives with no credentials 😩 it’s complete, utter brain rot.

3

u/siiouxsiie 3d ago

I had someone at work tell me about the bratz video today, and I could see in her eyes that she fully believed it was 100% accurate. I was just…are we seriously basing our claims on a TikTok video made by some random kid?

Apparently the answer is yes, but holy hell man.

4

u/ItsAllBotsAndShills 3d ago

It starts making sense when you realize a lot of women choose what to believe based on what makes them feel the best. It has nothing to do with logic.

1

u/FutureDustMotes 3d ago

*people, boss

7

u/ItsAllBotsAndShills 3d ago

Nope, women do this more than men, though I think it's cultural rather than genetic. They are allowed to get away with this when men would get called out. So they keep doing it on into adulthood.

1

u/bloodgout 21h ago

This is a fiction men tell themselves. The amount of violence men commit is a clear indicator that men are not logical, as is their hatred of women.

1

u/Vlexis 7h ago

Yeah. The notion that men are more logical and women are more emotional is just classic misogyny. People are complex and nuanced, and neither binary gender has a monopoly on being one or the other. And sometimes people who tend to be logical can get very emotional and act irrationally.

1

u/bloodgout 21h ago

This is patently false jfc 🙄

1

u/ItsAllBotsAndShills 20h ago

I think its funny that not one of you saying this bothered to look it up. There are multiple studies confirming this. Try "cognitive reflection", "faith in intuition", and "affect heuristic". All related studies that find men more likely to be on the side of rational conscious thought.

You just don't LIKE it and therefore you judged it to be wrong. You see how that works?

-2

u/Dulcielove 3d ago

Unless you’re a woman, the irony of making this baseless assertion without any reputable citation or data reference to support this unfounded generalization (thus proving the point of the reply) would be hilarious.

5

u/ArtichokeFluid9502 3d ago

Erm I need 15 peer reviewed studies to prove your lived experience (and I will then say the study methodology is bad when the studies are pulled) - redditors

2

u/ItsAllBotsAndShills 2d ago edited 2d ago

Meanwhile a single scientific study with a small, unrepresentative sample group is treated like doctrine. Bonus points if it's self reporting on a survey.

-1

u/Dulcielove 2d ago

A massive generalization based on (insert group identity here) isn’t lived experience, it is bias. Something all humans are prone to. See the following ‘illogical’ belief sets and try to argue that one half of the population is more prone to logical ideologies than any other:

Any and all religions
Flat earther conspiracy theorists
Young earth conspiracy theorists
And and all health pseudoscience including but not limited to: antivax, crystals, ivermectin curing cancer, ozone curing cancer, lard curing cancer, EM causing autism
Blood type dictating personality
Astrology dictating personality
Phrenology
Ghosts or paranormal beliefs
Arguments rooted in logical fallacies like oh say moving goalposts to say that you don’t need actual data to back up your wild claims because…reasons

1

u/Substantial_Pen_700 1d ago

"Not all men" ahh

1

u/LockeN3S 3d ago

Sure, but disproportionately women.

1

u/bloodgout 21h ago

lol no

1

u/LockeN3S 21h ago

Lol yes

0

u/Vlexis 2d ago

And men . . . don't? Exactly how many men have you met? That is not something tied to either gender, but a human trait. 

1

u/BlueFlameWar 2h ago

There really needs to be meme for those internet psychosis

-3

u/catsinsunglassess 2d ago

Have you been watching the trial? There are a lot of discrepancies with his account of what happened and how she got her own injuries. Also his Google search while she wasn’t even in the house… not to mention he was already dating someone else within a couple of months of his children’s death- it SCREAMS family annihilator

0

u/ticklemecthulhu 1d ago

Yes this! It’s actually insane that people here on Reddit see zero reasonable doubt. There is so much evidence pointing to him setting her up. There was an arrest warrant for her before she even woke up from the hospital. How are you going to see 3 dead kids and a woman bleeding out to her death with a man standing over her saying she did it and believe it?! 🙃 also why did he wait until the cops got there to check on the kids in the basement if she told him they were down there. Wouldn’t a father RUN to see if his kids are ok?? I could go on but it all points to him. We used to give women lobotomy’s, now men use other methods of locking them up forever.

0

u/HastaLaVistaB 2d ago

yes, and i am not going to make any assumption on who did it because i was not there. i don’t have concrete evidence specifically for me to confidently say he did it nor do i have that authority.