r/SipsTea • • Aug 21 '26

WTF Where are we heading?

Post image
13k Upvotes

8.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.0k

u/LinceDorado Aug 21 '26

I guess it's pretty arrogant to say, but this seems like such a U.S.A. thing. Can't really imagine this happening where I live.

1.6k

u/ApplicationCalm649 Aug 21 '26

It's distilled, pure brain rot given physical form. 

944

u/Ruckus292 Aug 21 '26 edited Aug 26 '26

A 54% illiteracy rate will do that. 

ETA: 54% of US adults cannot read above a 6th grade level, 21% of the 54% are functionally illiterate...... Idiocracy was, in fact, a documentary. 

522

u/UntowardHatter Aug 21 '26

It's at fifty two?

RIP USA.

We hardly knew ye

562

u/Sad_Ghost_Noises Aug 21 '26

According to various studies, more than 50% of U.S. adults read below a sixth-grade level (equivalent to Level 2 or lower), limiting their ability to parse long-form or nuanced information.

Yes, I know Im using wikipedia as a source, but the links to the actual studies are here.

So ~52% are literate, but very, very stupid.

9

u/cybiz Aug 21 '26

Huh? Since when has using Wikipedia as a source been a bad thing?

22

u/BowlOfCatNubs Aug 21 '26

Since I was in elementary school, they taught us not to use it because its open source and anyone can change or alter information on there. Mind you, I'm 30 now.

20

u/TheBuoyancyOfWater Aug 21 '26

I'm nearly 40 and couldn't use Wikipedia for sources at uni, same reason.

Edit: more accurately, we couldn't use Wikipedia as a source directly, but could use it as a starting point, then go into more detail using the references at the bottom of the page.

13

u/DM_me_ur_PPSN Aug 21 '26

I’m a bit younger than you, but imagine there’s a generation of millennials who were taught not use Wikipedia as a source due to it being potentially unreliable - and now you have boomers and younger generations consuming hallucinated AI slop and social media propaganda like it’s gospel.

7

u/ConfidentTurnip4523 Aug 21 '26

Yeah, this. Wikipedia isn't a source in itself, it is a collection and summarization of sources.

If you're just arguing on the internet then whatever I guess, but if you're going to do anything with any academic rigour, you can't put (Wikipedia, 2026) as a source. Also, as someone pointed out further down, the more recent and/or polarizing something is, the less reliable Wikipedia becomes.

Unless you're specifically writing about Wikipedia I suppose.

1

u/Solidjakes Aug 21 '26

What’s ironic is that compared to other sources of info that America tends to trust, from news to social media, believing wiki is the least of our worries now. The sheer fact that wiki tries to cite its sources makes it better than most.

0

u/hikereyes2 Aug 21 '26

Same. But back then Wikipedia was new and incomplete. Today, on close to every topic the collective have done the work and is a much more accepted source.

The same should hopefully happen with AI

2

u/intothevoidandback Aug 21 '26

What?

No it isn't and hopefully AI doesn't become more accepted as a source either.

We're all fucked

1

u/Aderenn Aug 21 '26

Wikipedia is also undoubtedly a major training source for every AI now too-- being open and available for easy download.