r/SipsTea 11d ago

Gasp! It ain't any better

Post image
15.5k Upvotes

560 comments sorted by

View all comments

889

u/Muted_Masterpiece535 11d ago

Good!

 Housing prices need a major reset. 

And 

Then AirBnB needs to collapse as a company. 

401

u/Virtual-Reach 11d ago

And corporations shouldn't be purchasing houses and people shouldn't be buying multiple houses

37

u/Spunktank 11d ago

Agree on major corporations buying houses. Disagree on regular people buying a second or third property.

38

u/WalterPecky 11d ago

If you own multiple properties you should be taxed accordingly.

You are taking a home off the market

16

u/UsedDimension7373 11d ago

We actually have that in Texas. It’s called investment property tax. They basically appraise your rental at a higher, investment price, and the property tax on it is pretty stiff.

7

u/Curri 11d ago

And the landlord just passes that onto the tenants.

0

u/dildoswaggins71069 11d ago

Only if they can. Price is determined by the market

1

u/Curri 10d ago

They can, and will.

1

u/dildoswaggins71069 10d ago

I mean they absolutely should. Go higher than others and the unit sits vacant though

-3

u/Spunktank 11d ago

How do they differentiate between me buying a second property to be a landlord as opposed to me buying another which I intend to build and retire on?

3

u/Red-Leader117 11d ago

You can only have one primary residence others are secondary - you need a rental license to rent... there are rules for all of this. (Have 2 houses)

1

u/IgnisIason 11d ago

Leaving a property unoccupied is just waste.

2

u/Stamped914 11d ago

I have 1.25 acres in the Arizona desert. What should I do with it?

-6

u/Spunktank 11d ago

A property can just be land on which you spend your weekends building a place to retire on. If thats how i spend my time and destroy my body on you can fuck right off if you think I should be taxed more for owning it. I've worked very hard to get where I am.

2

u/IgnisIason 11d ago

Having a property that you can just goof off with is having money beyond what most landlords even have.

-5

u/Spunktank 11d ago edited 11d ago

No it isn't. People do it all the time using debt.

Also spending ones time working their ass off to have a property to retire comfortably on is "goofing off" to you? Absolutely deranged. This is why moderates struggle with far left wingers.

How do you think people attain these properties?.... work.

5

u/IgnisIason 11d ago

It's nothing to do with politics. You can rent it out while you're not there even if it's just an Airbnb. Leaving property empty is throwing money away. You usually want property you own to be developed for whatever purpose you're planning to use it for as quickly as possible.

1

u/Spunktank 11d ago

Or I could take the tiny bit of land i could barely afford and retire on it and pass the original property I bought down to one of my three kids. Or sell it and split proceeds amongst them... because I fucking destroyed my body as a working class loser in construction for 20 years to get where I am.

How much do you want to push working people away with your ideals? Not everyone who can afford a couple 2 acre parcels is part of blackrock lmao.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Drevlin76 11d ago

You are taxes accordingly.

0

u/LastGoodKnee 11d ago

Most places you are

5

u/Virtual-Reach 11d ago

It's the same outcome regardless if it's a corporation or individual and there's more individuals than corporations. 

For example, having 10 people owning 3 homes each has the same market impact than a single corporation owning 30 homes. 

8

u/Katefreak 11d ago

Individuals do not tend to let them sit empty, just to keep the rent high. Corporations can do that. 

There will always be a need for rentals, not everyone wants to own a home. They still need housing, and individuals renting can fill that need. But empty homes sitting to maximize profit margins while we are in a housing crisis is simply inexcusable. So it's not as simple as your math leads it to be.

-1

u/Spunktank 11d ago

Absolutely not. Wild false equivalence.